Back to vendors
L

Lorikeet

Also known as: Lorikeet CX, Coach

Visit site
Entry price~$0.80/resolution (Scale: 48k/$48k yr)Full pricing detail

AI support agent for regulated fintech, healthtech and insurance that follows the customer's own written procedures to resolve multi-step tickets across chat, email, voice, SMS and WhatsApp, with least-privilege scoped tools and a replayable per-step audit trail.

Lorikeet builds customer-support AI for regulated fintech and healthtech, using an Intelligent Graph to drive multi-step actions across chat, email, voice, and SMS, with its Coach feature providing 100% QA plus guardrails and audit. Pricing is per resolution, around $0.80 per resolved text ticket and $1.00 per resolved voice call.

Vendor details

Canonical URL

https://lorikeetcx.ai

Category

Customer support agent

Subcategory

Support — regulated CX

Company status

independent

Use cases & customers

Primary use cases

customer supportmulti-step support actionsQA

Target customers

fintechhealthtechsupport teams

Deployment options

SaaS

In practice

Your support touches regulated fintech and healthtech, so a wrong action is a compliance problem. Lorikeet drives multi-step actions with guardrails and an audit trail built in.

A real resolution often takes several steps, not one canned reply. Lorikeet's Intelligent Graph carries the customer through multi-step actions across chat, email, voice, and SMS.

You can only QA a sample of conversations and hope the rest are fine. Lorikeet's Coach reviews every interaction, so quality checking covers all of them, not a sample.

Agentic Index coverage score

11.0 / 14 capabilities · 79%

Integrations & Tool Calling Full

The integrations page documents named connectors across ticketing and messaging (Zendesk, Zendesk Messaging, Front, Help Scout, Slack), CRM (Salesforce, including running workflows inside it) and revenue tooling, with tools set up as APIs or webhooks so the agent reads data and takes actions in arbitrary internal systems, scoped least-privilege with short-lived single-operation tokens and HMAC-signed inbound webhooks.

Sourcelorikeetcx.ai/integrationsread 2026-09-05

Workflow Orchestration Full

Lorikeet executes multi-step work against documented procedure: it publishes that whether it is a three-step form or a forty-step refund flow, the agent executes with precision, following the customer's own standard operating procedures rather than improvising, and the product surface names the workflow primitives it runs on, including workflow matching, ticket triage, gather, get status, choice and route based on problem, with tool calls such as retrieving recent transactions shown inline. Lorikeet frames this as specialized agents collaborating in real time across channels to deliver end-to-end resolutions, and the login surface is a workflows console.

Sourcelorikeetcx.airead 2026-09-05

Knowledge Grounding & RAG Full

Lorikeet grounds its agent on the customer's own documented procedures rather than on retrieval alone. It states plainly that it follows your SOPs, taps into your systems and handles your highest-stakes workflows, and has said that rather than relying solely on retrieval-augmented generation its architecture goes deeper by following the procedures themselves, so the agent neither merely retrieves nor invents process. Help centers, reference materials and internal tools supply the surrounding corpus, so the grounding is a maintained structure the customer authors and owns.

Sourcelorikeetcx.airead 2026-09-05

Human Oversight & Guardrails Full

Runtime guardrails detect sensitive topics and escalate to the customer's team before the agent proceeds, outbound checks block the agent from disclosing withheld fields or acting outside policy independently of the model, tools are scoped least-privilege with per-user elevation required for dangerous actions, and the integration is red-teamed against prompt injection and scope escalation before go-live. Humans author the procedures the agent follows and handoffs arrive with the investigation complete.

Sourcelorikeetcx.ai/product/trustread 2026-09-05

Security, Identity & Governance Full

SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001:2022, HIPAA and GDPR, all independently verified and published on a public Vanta trust center at trust.lorikeetcx.ai with reports downloadable under NDA and refreshed annually, plus signed BAAs for healthcare customers. Named controls: automatic PII redaction, minimum-necessary PHI handling, TLS 1.3 in transit and AES-256 at rest, no public internet access to production, row-level-security tenant isolation, SSO with hardware-key MFA, and third-party penetration testing.

Sourcelorikeetcx.ai/product/trustread 2026-09-05

Observability & Auditability Full

Every customer interaction, model choice and action is tracked and stated to be fully explainable rather than a black box, with Lorikeet's integration guidance describing every tool call, elevation request and reasoning step logged with timestamps and replayable for a regulator examination, and Coach quality-scoring every conversation, human or AI. That reconstructs the decision path rather than only logging the conversation.

Sourcelorikeetcx.ai/product/trustread 2026-09-05

Memory & State Persistence Partial

Lorikeet names a customer memory but does not describe its shape. It states that customer memory maintains context across every touchpoint, and that a customer who starts in chat does not repeat themselves on a call because the channels run on one engine, so persistence spans channels rather than sitting inside a single session. No scope, lifetime, retention window or deletion control for that memory is documented.

Sourcelorikeetcx.airead 2026-09-05

Deployment & Data Residency Full

Production runs on Google Cloud Platform in a private VPC with no public internet access and row-level-security tenant isolation, US primary hosting, and data storage residency the customer can take in Australia or the EU. Lorikeet's content-marketing articles name the US, Australia and the UK, but the product trust page states Australia and the EU.

Sourcelorikeetcx.ai/product/trustread 2026-09-05

Prebuilt Agents, Templates & Packs Partial

Configuration is authored per customer from their own standard operating procedures, which is the deliberate product position rather than a gap: Lorikeet's stated test is that if you can explain to a human agent how to resolve a ticket, the agent can handle it, so time to value depends on the customer's procedure documentation.

No template library, prebuilt agent catalog or marketplace is documented, and the specialized agents in the Team of Agents architecture are internal collaborators rather than assets a buyer browses and adopts. Lorikeet also runs a separate property at lorikeet.tools, branded Toolshed, and what it holds is not described.

Sourcelorikeetcx.airead 2026-09-05

Triggers & Channel Coverage Full

Five channels run on one engine plus a programmatic surface: the homepage names phone, SMS, chat, email and WhatsApp, with an SDK listed alongside them as a delivery surface, and Lorikeet describes specialized agents collaborating in real time across chat, email, voice and SMS to deliver end-to-end resolutions. Voice runs at sub-second latency on the same engine, so a customer who starts in chat does not repeat themselves on a call, and every channel inherits the same guardrails and logging.

Sourcelorikeetcx.airead 2026-09-05

Model Flexibility & Routing Partial

The trust page names OpenAI, Anthropic and Baseten among core subprocessors, so several model providers are in play, held to zero-data-retention agreements with no fine-tuning on customer data, and Lorikeet describes routing dynamically between providers by task. The routing is Lorikeet's own and the model choice is tracked rather than chosen; no customer-facing selection or bring-your-own-model control is documented.

Sourcelorikeetcx.ai/product/trustread 2026-09-05

APIs, SDKs & MCP Extensibility Partial

A developer documentation site exists at docs.lorikeetcx.ai covering a quickstart and API reference, and Lorikeet's integration guidance describes scoped Bearer-credential access and HMAC-signed inbound webhooks the customer's systems call. Lorikeet also publishes public HTTP endpoints that external AI assistants can call to query its support agent and book demos. The documentation site sits behind a customer access code, so the platform API and its scope are open only to customers, and no SDK is advertised.

Sourcedocs.lorikeetcx.ai/guides/quickstartread 2026-09-05

Testing, Debugging & Optimization Full

Lorikeet tests on both sides of go-live, with a readable result on each. Before launch, a pre-go-live simulation suite lets a security or compliance team validate agent behavior before unsupervised resolution begins.

After launch, Coach ships as a named product that reviews every ticket rather than a sample, whether handled by humans, AI or both, surfaces why performance is trending up or down, proposes fixes and, with approval, implements them, with automated quality assurance and thematic analysis and segmentation and export. Coach is sold to Lorikeet customers and standalone, is metered per ticket, and reached general availability in January 2026. That is a gate on the release path and a scored optimization loop after it, with the customer's own agent as what is tested.

Sourcelorikeetcx.airead 2026-09-05

Browser & Computer Use Not documented

Work happens programmatically inside the customer's systems through controlled integrations, tapping into Zendesk, Stripe and internal APIs, with tool calls such as retrieving recent transactions shown as named workflow steps. No browser control, hosted session or computer use is documented. Its public HTTP endpoints for external AI assistants are Lorikeet exposing itself to be called rather than operating an interface.

Sourcelorikeetcx.airead 2026-09-05

The Agentic Index coverage score grades every vendor Full, Partial or Not documented against the same 14 buyer facing capabilities, from public evidence only. Each capability links to how all vendors in the index score on it. How this evidence is graded

Recent platform changes

2026-09-30·Observability / auditabilityVerified

Customer conversations that come from AI agents rather than people can now be flagged in Lorikeet, in beta. After each chat, email, voice, SMS or WhatsApp conversation it checks for signs such as automated messages or a self declared AI, and tags confirmed hits in Lorikeet and the connected ticketing system.

Bears on: Observability / auditability

View source
View all 1 change for Lorikeet →Tracked since Sep 2026 · Verified from public vendor sources

Pricing

~$0.80/resolution (Scale: 48k/$48k yr)

resolutions

Included quota

Per-resolution usage: ~$0.80/resolved chat-email-SMS ticket, ~$1.00/resolved voice call, escalations free, customer-defined resolution. Representative Scale plan: 48,000 resolutions for $48,000/yr. Coach QA add-on ~$0.10/ticket. Omnichannel (chat/email/voice/SMS/WhatsApp) on one engine with replayable audit trails.

What is public

Lorikeet (AI support for complex/regulated companies - fintech, healthtech, gaming) prices per resolution, customer-defined: ~$0.80 per resolved chat/email/SMS ticket and ~$1.00 per resolved voice call, with escalations to a human not charged and the customer holding veto over what counts as a resolution. Its standalone QA agent (Coach) runs ~$0.10/ticket. A representative Scale plan is 48,000 resolutions for $48,000/year.

Billing mechanics

Outcome-based: you pay only when the AI resolves a ticket, and only for outcomes you agree count (resolution defined up front, customer keeps the veto), so the vendor can't bill touched-but-unresolved conversations. Escalations to humans are free, removing any incentive to claim a fix it didn't deliver. Voice resolutions bill slightly higher (~$1.00) than text (~$0.80). Coach (100% post-facto QA) is an optional ~$0.10/ticket add-on. Annual commitments (e.g., the Scale plan, 48,000 resolutions/$48,000) are available.

Cost watchouts

Heavier configuration than a drop-in FAQ widget (forward-deployed setup, ~1 month to operational), voice resolutions cost more (~$1.00) than text, Coach QA is a separate add-on, annual Scale commitments prepay a resolution bundle; overkill (and over-spec) for simple low-stakes FAQ deflection

Variable cost rationale

Outcome-based with a customer-controlled resolution definition and free escalations caps downside - you pay only for approved resolutions - but total spend still scales with resolved volume; the Scale plan converts that into a fixed annual commitment

Additional watchouts

The per-resolution model protects the buyer (customer-defined resolution, free escalations), but the platform is deliberately specialized - a simple FAQ-deflection use case will find it more capability (and setup) than needed

Overage / add-ons

Pure per-resolution usage - you pay for resolved outcomes; unresolved/escalated tickets aren't charged. On annual commitments (Scale plan), resolutions beyond the bundle bill at the per-resolution rate; below it you've prepaid the commit.

Sales call required

Yes, required for paid access

Lowest paid plan

~$500/mo or ~$0.80/res

Commercial notes

Built for regulated/complex support (fintech/healthtech/insurance/gaming); ~80% of customers are US financial institutions; omnichannel incl. sub-1-second voice; deterministic workflows + examination-grade audit trails; published result of ~85% automation at a regulated fintech with equal-or-better CSAT; human-ticket baseline cited at $1.25-$4

Key ambiguities

Exact per-customer rates and minimums depend on volume/channel mix and the negotiated resolution definition; the public figures (~$0.80/$1.00, Scale $48K/yr) come largely from Lorikeet's own materials rather than a standalone rate card

Cancellation / refund

Usage-based per resolution, or annual commitments (e.g., Scale, 48,000 resolutions/$48,000); resolution definition agreed up front with customer veto; enterprise terms negotiated

Support SLA / resale

Forward-deployed implementation (~1 month to operational); defense-in-depth guardrails (pre-launch adversarial simulation, inbound/outbound checks, 100% post-facto QA via Coach); replayable audit trails for compliance sign-off; native helpdesk integrations (Kustomer, Front, etc.)

Missing data

Lorikeet's public pricing page is light - the rate figures come mostly from its own articles; per-customer minimums and full plan structure beyond the Scale example aren't published. No $500 monthly floor appears in Lorikeet's public figures.

Agentic Index verified 2026-06-25

Alternatives to Lorikeet

The closest documented capability profiles to Lorikeet among customer support agents tracked by Agentic Index, ordered by similarity on the same 14 point evidence the rankings use. No vendor pays for placement.

  • Omilia11.0 / 14Fuller documented coverage on Prebuilt Agents, Templates & Packs
  • ASAPP11.5 / 14Fuller documented coverage on Memory & State Persistence and APIs, SDKs & MCP Extensibility
  • Cognigy11.5 / 14Fuller documented coverage on Model Flexibility & Routing and APIs, SDKs & MCP Extensibility
  • Cresta10.5 / 14Fuller documented coverage on Prebuilt Agents, Templates & Packs
  • Delight.ai11.5 / 14Fuller documented coverage on Memory & State Persistence and APIs, SDKs & MCP Extensibility
  • ElevenAgents12.5 / 14Fuller documented coverage on Prebuilt Agents, Templates & Packs and Model Flexibility & Routing

Similarity is computed from each vendor's Agentic Index coverage score evidence, axis by axis, not from the totals. How this evidence is graded

Contact us

Found a vendor we missed? Have feedback on the index? We'd love to hear from you.