Agentic Index

Fin vs Lorikeet (2026)

Fin last verified ·Lorikeet last verified

Fin and Lorikeet both charge per resolution at the same headline rate, and they serve different risk profiles. That verdict is the Agentic Index coverage score, graded from each vendor's own published materials.

Fin is $0.99 per outcome, with knowledge grounding, multichannel support and simulation based testing. Lorikeet adds a platform fee, from $2,100 a month billed annually on Start, with $0.99 for each chat, email or SMS resolution and $1.50 for each voice one, and it is built for regulated fintech, healthtech and insurance, following the customer's written procedures with an audit trail of every step. The rate per resolution matches, so the difference is Lorikeet's audited procedures for a regulated buyer against Fin's lighter entry.

This comparison is published by Agentic Index, an independent agentic AI vendor research platform. Fin and Lorikeet are each graded against the same 14 capability Agentic Index taxonomy, from the vendor's own public materials under the Agentic Index verification standard, alongside 1,084 researched vendors. No vendor pays for placement and no vendor has reviewed this page. How this evidence is graded

Choose Fin if

  • Simulation testing before launch is the safeguard you want.
  • You already use Intercom and the integration is effectively free.
  • Your support is not regulated, so a platform fee for audit depth buys little.

Choose Lorikeet if

  • You are in regulated fintech or health technology and every conversation must be reviewable.
  • 100 percent quality assurance rather than sampling is the compliance posture you need.
  • Multi step actions across voice and SMS alongside chat is the channel range.
Feature
F
Fin
L
Lorikeet
Action & orchestration

Integrations & Tool Calling

Ability to connect agents to real systems through native integrations, OAuth-authenticated actions, custom tools, APIs, webhooks, or MCP-compatible tools.

Workflow Orchestration

Ability to sequence, branch, retry, route, and combine deterministic workflow nodes with autonomous agent steps.

Triggers & Channel Coverage

How agents wake up and where they work: schedules, webhooks, message events, CRM events, inbox events, chat, email, voice, and collaboration tools.

Knowledge & context

Knowledge Grounding & RAG

Ability to ground agent behavior in company data through document ingestion, retrieval, external knowledge APIs, semantic search, or RAG layers.

Memory & State Persistence

Ability to persist context across a run, conversation, workflow, user, team, or longer-term memory layer.

Control & trust

Human Oversight & Guardrails

Approval steps, consent checkpoints, escalation rules, structured guardrails, policy constraints, and pause/resume controls.

Security, Identity & Governance

RBAC, SSO, auditability, encryption, least-privilege tool access, compliance posture, and data handling policy.

Observability & Auditability

Traces, logs, execution histories, metrics, audit events, and debugging detail for production agent behavior.

Deployment & Data Residency

Deployment modes and options, including SaaS, dedicated cloud, VPC, on-prem, hybrid, local runtime, and self-hosting.

Solution readiness

Prebuilt Agents, Templates & Packs

Ready-made workflows, packaged employees, templates, blueprints, industry solutions, and role-specific agents that reduce time-to-value.

Platform extensibility

Model Flexibility & Routing

Ability to work across multiple foundation models, route tasks to different models, or let buyers bring their own providers and keys.

APIs, SDKs & MCP Extensibility

Composability layer: stable APIs, SDKs, MCP tool consumption/serving, custom tools, and integration into internal systems.

Testing, Debugging & Optimization

Testing, debugging, scoring, retries, fallbacks, quality gates, and optimization loops for improving agent workflows before and after deployment.

Specialist automation

Browser & Computer Use

Browser, desktop, or remote/local computer control for workflows that cannot be handled through stable APIs alone.

Pricing snapshot

Sourced from the Index pricing dataset · open each vendor's profile for full detail.

Pricing
F
Fin
L
Lorikeet

Entry price

Lowest public entry point

$0.99 per outcome Start at $2,100 per month billed annually, plus $0.99 per chat, email or SMS resolution and $1.50 per voice resolution. Scale at $5,100 per month with lower rates. Signature is custom.

Pricing confidence

How public the numbers are

Public, exact Public, exact

Billing

Primary billing axis

Outcomes, at $0.99 each, plus helpdesk seats when Fin runs inside Intercom. Resolutions, billed per resolution by channel on top of a monthly plan fee that is billed annually.

Variable cost

Workload / overage exposure

High variable cost Medium variable cost

Free tier / trial

Try before you buy

No free tierTrial
No free tierTrial

Buying motion

Self-serve vs sales call

Mixed Sales call

Pricing verified

When this pricing was last checked

Product updates

Newest first, each linked to its source.

Fin

  • · Human approval / guardrails

    When a conversation needs a review, a piece of information or an approval, Fin now loops in a human teammate to approve, edit or take over, instead of escalating and leaving.

    Source
  • · Observability / auditability

    Intercom introduced custom reporting metrics that can be filtered by Fin AI Agent ratings or used to count escalations from AI agents to humans.

    Source
  • · Observability / auditability

    Intercom launched Evals and Releases for Fin, providing tools to test AI agent changes before deployment, control gradual rollouts, and monitor live conversations for quality.

    Source

Lorikeet

  • · MCP / tool calling / API

    Lorikeet concierges now support the Personal Agent Protocol, the draft open protocol from Sierra and Meta for consumer agents, alongside A2A and WebMCP.

    Source
  • · Observability / auditability

    Customer conversations that come from AI agents rather than people can now be flagged in Lorikeet, in beta.

    Source

Other matchups in customer support agents

Not the pairing you were after? These compare a different set of customer support agents on the same 14 capabilities.

See all 136 customer support agents comparisons

Contact us

Found a vendor we missed? Have feedback on the index? We'd love to hear from you.