Agentic Index
Fin vs Lorikeet (2026)
Fin last verified ·Lorikeet last verified
Fin and Lorikeet both charge per resolution at the same headline rate, and they serve different risk profiles. That verdict is the Agentic Index coverage score, graded from each vendor's own published materials.
Fin is $0.99 per outcome, with knowledge grounding, multichannel support and simulation based testing. Lorikeet adds a platform fee, from $2,100 a month billed annually on Start, with $0.99 for each chat, email or SMS resolution and $1.50 for each voice one, and it is built for regulated fintech, healthtech and insurance, following the customer's written procedures with an audit trail of every step. The rate per resolution matches, so the difference is Lorikeet's audited procedures for a regulated buyer against Fin's lighter entry.
This comparison is published by Agentic Index, an independent agentic AI vendor research platform. Fin and Lorikeet are each graded against the same 14 capability Agentic Index taxonomy, from the vendor's own public materials under the Agentic Index verification standard, alongside 1,084 researched vendors. No vendor pays for placement and no vendor has reviewed this page. How this evidence is graded
Choose Fin if
- Simulation testing before launch is the safeguard you want.
- You already use Intercom and the integration is effectively free.
- Your support is not regulated, so a platform fee for audit depth buys little.
Choose Lorikeet if
- You are in regulated fintech or health technology and every conversation must be reviewable.
- 100 percent quality assurance rather than sampling is the compliance posture you need.
- Multi step actions across voice and SMS alongside chat is the channel range.
| Feature | F Fin |
L Lorikeet |
|---|---|---|
| Action & orchestration | ||
|
Integrations & Tool Calling Ability to connect agents to real systems through native integrations, OAuth-authenticated actions, custom tools, APIs, webhooks, or MCP-compatible tools. |
||
|
FinIntegrations & Tool Calling Fin runs on the customer's existing helpdesk across Intercom, Salesforce, HubSpot, Freshworks, Dixa, Front, Zoho, Sprinklr and Gorgias, adds Data Connectors for live external data, takes action to update external systems, and spans messaging and telephony channels. Sourcefin.ai/pricingread 2026-09-05 |
||
|
LorikeetIntegrations & Tool Calling Built in connectors cover Zendesk, Zendesk Messaging, Intercom, Salesforce (including Salesforce Messaging), HubSpot, Front, Help Scout, Kustomer, Slack and Genesys Cloud, and any helpdesk that sends webhooks connects through Flexible Ticketing. Telephony connects through Amazon Connect, Twilio, Vonage, Five9, AirCall, Dialpad and Talkdesk, and knowledge through Confluence, Guru, Google Docs and Notion. Business systems connect through APIs, webhooks and MCP servers (Notion and Linear are named), so the agent reads data and takes actions such as processing a refund in Stripe or updating an account, with read only or write access set per integration, tools scoped to least privilege, short lived single operation tokens and HMAC signed inbound webhooks. Coach can set up custom API integrations, while API keys and secrets are entered by the customer. Sourcelorikeetcx.ai/integrationsread 2026-11-02 |
||
|
Workflow Orchestration Ability to sequence, branch, retry, route, and combine deterministic workflow nodes with autonomous agent steps. |
||
|
FinWorkflow Orchestration Procedures are configured multi-step workflows the agent runs end to end, including branches that end in a handoff to a human or into a workflow. Workflow automations on the Intercom helpdesk and Operator, a separate agent for customer operations work, sit alongside. Sourcefin.ai/pricingread 2026-09-05 |
||
|
LorikeetWorkflow Orchestration The Concierge agent runs multi step work by following the customer's own standard operating procedures, whether a three step form or a forty step refund flow, inside natural language and deterministic workflows. Sensitive steps such as payments and identity checks run as code the agent can invoke but never alter. Workflow steps include workflow matching, ticket triage, gather, get status, choice and route based on problem, with tool calls such as retrieving recent transactions shown inline, and a team of specialist agents can coordinate with third parties by phone, SMS, email and Slack to resolve multi party issues. Customers deploy topic by topic, so the first topics go live while harder ones are still being trained, and Dreamweaver works from a goal such as retention rather than a written workflow. Sourcelorikeetcx.airead 2026-11-02 |
||
|
Triggers & Channel Coverage How agents wake up and where they work: schedules, webhooks, message events, CRM events, inbox events, chat, email, voice, and collaboration tools. |
||
|
FinTriggers & Channel Coverage Channels include Voice, Email, Messenger, Slack, WhatsApp, SMS, Instagram, Facebook Messenger and Fin over API. Tickets, cases and emails come in from the connected helpdesk, and a proactive outbound suite runs on the Intercom helpdesk. Sourcefin.ai/pricingread 2026-09-05 |
||
|
LorikeetTriggers & Channel Coverage Chat, email, voice, SMS and WhatsApp run on one agent, inbound and outbound, with an SDK and the Lorikeet chat widget as further surfaces; WhatsApp is served through the customer's Twilio number registered for the WhatsApp Business API. Voice answers and places calls on local numbers in the US, UK and Australia with sub second responses, and every channel inherits the same workflows, guardrails and quality scoring. The outbound agent starts conversations itself: reminders, document requests, appointment confirmations and follow ups over SMS and voice, on recorded consent per channel, capped at three campaign calls per number in 24 hours, with voicemail detected and handled. Dreamweaver reaches out on a schedule or when something changes, on the channel each customer prefers, or chooses not to contact them. Sourcelorikeetcx.airead 2026-11-02 |
||
| Knowledge & context | ||
|
Knowledge Grounding & RAG Ability to ground agent behavior in company data through document ingestion, retrieval, external knowledge APIs, semantic search, or RAG layers. |
||
|
FinKnowledge Grounding & RAG Fin is trained on Knowledge Sources, Data Connectors, Procedures, Guidance and Categories, ingesting help center content from Intercom, Zendesk or Salesforce plus any public URL. The ingested content re-syncs every 24 hours for connected help centers and weekly for external web content. Sourcefin.ai/help/en/articles/13975777-pricing-and-usage-limitsread 2026-09-05 |
||
|
LorikeetKnowledge Grounding & RAG The agent is grounded in the customer's own documented procedures, not retrieval alone. It learns from the customer's help docs, SOPs, policies and brand guidelines, taps into its systems for live context, and follows the procedures themselves rather than only searching articles. A built in grounding guardrail, always on, keeps answers to the customer's instructions, tool results and knowledge articles, and the agent escalates when it lacks the information to answer. Coach audits the knowledge base for gaps and outdated articles and proposes the fixes, and knowledge sources such as Confluence, Guru, Google Docs and Notion connect directly. Sourcelorikeetcx.airead 2026-11-02 |
||
|
Memory & State Persistence Ability to persist context across a run, conversation, workflow, user, team, or longer-term memory layer. |
||
|
FinMemory & State Persistence Context carries within a conversation and across a voice call, and Fin passes full customer context to a human on escalation. No memory layer with a stated scope or lifetime is named, and the persistence Fin advertises is a learning flywheel that feeds conversations into model improvement, not a memory store that can be located or deleted for a given customer. Sourcefin.ai/capabilitiesread 2026-09-05 |
||
|
LorikeetMemory & State Persistence Customer memory keeps context across every touchpoint, so a customer who starts in chat does not repeat themselves on a call, because the channels run on one engine. Dreamweaver goes further for each customer: it keeps that customer's goals, history and preferences, learns when they reply and how they like to talk, and acts on them over weeks and months. No scope, lifetime, retention window or per customer deletion control for that memory is described; the FAQ says a departing customer's data is deleted within 60 days of request. Sourcelorikeetcx.airead 2026-11-02 |
||
| Control & trust | ||
|
Human Oversight & Guardrails Approval steps, consent checkpoints, escalation rules, structured guardrails, policy constraints, and pause/resume controls. |
||
|
FinHuman Oversight & Guardrails Procedures carry deterministic controls and cross-team approvals, with multi-stage validation and approval workflows running before any action is taken, and Fin performs only actions the customer has explicitly configured and approved. Refund paths enforce eligibility windows, value thresholds and approval requirements, and Guidance bounds tone, scope and escalation. Sourcefin.ai/trainread 2026-09-05 |
||
|
LorikeetHuman Oversight & Guardrails Guardrails run as checks separate from the agent itself, on both sides of the conversation. Agent guardrails review every reply before it is sent and message checks screen each incoming customer message, including for prompt injection, with up to ten of each per concierge; when one fires it can alert the team, make the agent rewrite its reply (two retries, then escalate) or escalate the ticket at once, and every trigger is logged on the ticket. Underneath, customer isolation, server side identity validation, workflow scoped tool access and hard execution caps are enforced in code, and sensitive steps such as payments and identity checks run as code the agent cannot alter. People write the procedures the agent follows, handoffs arrive with the investigation done, Resolution Loop lets a person take over the same conversation thread, Coach makes changes only with approval, and Dreamweaver checks contact hours, limits and consent before every message and flags customers who need a person. Sourcelorikeetcx.ai/product/trustread 2026-11-02 |
||
|
Security, Identity & Governance RBAC, SSO, auditability, encryption, least-privilege tool access, compliance posture, and data handling policy. |
||
|
FinSecurity, Identity & Governance Intercom supports SSO with Okta, Azure AD and OneLogin, plus 2FA, SCIM provisioning and IP restrictions, and holds SOC 2, ISO 27001, ISO 42001, ISO 27701, AIUC-1 and HIPAA. Sourcefin.airead 2026-09-05 |
||
|
LorikeetSecurity, Identity & Governance Lorikeet is SOC 2 Type II audited and ISO 27001:2022 certified, with the reports on a public Vanta trust center at trust.lorikeetcx.ai, downloadable under NDA. It says it is HIPAA compliant and GDPR aligned, signs BAAs and DPAs, holds zero data retention agreements with all model vendors and does not train models on customer data; it does not hold PCI DSS, so card capture stays in the customer's own payment flow. Controls include PII redaction configurable by category and applied automatically to restricted viewers, minimum necessary handling of protected health information, TLS 1.3 in transit and AES 256 at rest, no public internet access to production, row level tenant isolation and third party penetration testing. On the customer side, accounts are set up with user roles, role based access control limits which tools each team member can use through the MCP server, and helpdesk connections go through an admin approved authorization flow. Sourcelorikeetcx.ai/product/trustread 2026-11-02 |
||
|
Observability & Auditability Traces, logs, execution histories, metrics, audit events, and debugging detail for production agent behavior. |
||
|
FinObservability & Auditability The Analyze stage includes Topics Explorer, CX Score quality scoring across every conversation, an Optimize Dashboard and configurable alerts, which measure what happened. No production trace showing why the agent acted as it did is described, and the view of Fin's reasoning sits inside Simulations, a test surface used before launch. Sourcefin.ai/analyzeread 2026-09-05 |
||
|
LorikeetObservability & Auditability Every customer interaction, model choice and action is tracked and explainable, not a black box. Every tool call, elevation request and reasoning step is logged with timestamps and can be replayed for a regulator examination, every guardrail event lands on the ticket and in guardrail metrics, and every configuration change made through the MCP server carries an audit trail. Coach scores every AI handled conversation Good, Warning or Critical into a Ticket Quality Score, with human agent scoring on request, and answers analytics questions in plain language. Ticket history, outcomes and quality scores can be exported, and the FAQ lists audit trail exports, data access logs and compliance reports for regulatory reporting. Sourcelorikeetcx.ai/product/trustread 2026-11-02 |
||
|
Deployment & Data Residency Deployment modes and options, including SaaS, dedicated cloud, VPC, on-prem, hybrid, local runtime, and self-hosting. |
||
|
FinDeployment & Data Residency Customer data is hosted in the United States, the European Union or Australia, chosen to meet the customer's residency requirement, with redundancy across regions behind a 99.8% uptime SLA. Sourcefin.airead 2026-09-05 |
||
|
LorikeetDeployment & Data Residency Production runs on Google Cloud Platform in a private VPC with no public internet access and row level tenant isolation, encrypted with TLS 1.3 in transit and AES 256 at rest. Data storage residency is available in the US, Australia and the EU: the pricing page sets US residency on the Start and Scale plans, and Signature can choose a custom region. Lorikeet is delivered as SaaS; no self hosted or single tenant option is described. Sourcelorikeetcx.ai/product/trustread 2026-11-02 |
||
| Solution readiness | ||
|
Prebuilt Agents, Templates & Packs Ready-made workflows, packaged employees, templates, blueprints, industry solutions, and role-specific agents that reduce time-to-value. |
||
|
FinPrebuilt Agents, Templates & Packs Fin ships named role-specific agents that customers adopt as units, Fin for Service, Fin for Sales and Fin for Ecommerce, each with pre-trained skills, alongside packaged helpdesk editions for Salesforce, Freshdesk and HubSpot, a Simulation library and the AI Agent Blueprint. Sourcefin.ai/capabilitiesread 2026-09-05 |
||
|
LorikeetPrebuilt Agents, Templates & Packs Each customer's configuration is written from its own standard operating procedures, by design, so time to value depends on the customer's procedure documentation; Coach builds the first concierge from a plain language description on a free trial. There is no template library, prebuilt agent catalog or marketplace, and the specialist agents in the team of agents architecture work together internally rather than being assets a customer browses and adopts. Dreamweaver takes a goal such as retention or lifetime value with no SOPs, workflows or campaigns to write, which is a different route to the same end rather than a pack. Toolshed at lorikeet.tools is described as free CX tools and calculators. Sourcelorikeetcx.airead 2026-11-02 |
||
| Platform extensibility | ||
|
Model Flexibility & Routing Ability to work across multiple foundation models, route tasks to different models, or let buyers bring their own providers and keys. |
||
|
FinModel Flexibility & Routing Answers come from Fin's own proprietary model family, the Apex model built for customer support and Apex Flash for low latency voice, under the patented Fin AI Engine. No customer or admin model selection is described. Sourcefin.ai/pricingread 2026-09-05 |
||
|
LorikeetModel Flexibility & Routing OpenAI, Anthropic and Baseten are among the core sub processors beside Google Cloud, so several model providers are in play, all under zero data retention agreements with no fine tuning on customer data, and Lorikeet routes between providers by task; on voice it switches models to balance latency and precision. The routing is Lorikeet's own and the model choice is tracked, not made by the customer, with no customer facing selection or bring your own model control. Sourcelorikeetcx.ai/product/trustread 2026-11-02 |
||
|
APIs, SDKs & MCP Extensibility Composability layer: stable APIs, SDKs, MCP tool consumption/serving, custom tools, and integration into internal systems. |
||
|
FinAPIs, SDKs & MCP Extensibility The Fin API Platform exposes the Apex generative, Retrieval and Reranker models individually or as a complete RAG pipeline for building custom agents, and the Fin Agent API embeds Fin in a customer's own product without the Intercom messenger. API is a first-class deployment channel, and the versioned REST API comes with an OpenAPI specification, interactive reference and changelog. A help center note says Fin cannot serve conversations created through the API, but it predates the API Platform and covers only that one path. Sourcefin.ai/api-platformread 2026-09-05 |
||
|
LorikeetAPIs, SDKs & MCP Extensibility Outside callers can drive the platform three ways. The Lorikeet MCP server, released 11 March 2026 at a published endpoint (api.lorikeetcx.ai/v1/mcp), lets Claude, ChatGPT, Claude Code and Codex manage workflows, knowledge, tickets, tools, integrations, simulations, guardrails and analytics with read and write access, every change logged; its auth scheme and tool list sit in the developer documentation, which is behind a customer access code at docs.lorikeetcx.ai, so two of the four clauses for Full cannot be read. A voice API lets a customer's phone system create a Lorikeet conversation with caller context before forwarding the call, and the SDK embeds Lorikeet in the customer's own product. Lorikeet also publishes public HTTP endpoints for outside AI assistants to ask its support agent questions, book demos and start a trial sign up. No SDK reference or API reference is readable without a customer login. Sourcedocs.lorikeetcx.ai/guides/quickstartread 2026-11-02 |
||
|
Testing, Debugging & Optimization Testing, debugging, scoring, retries, fallbacks, quality gates, and optimization loops for improving agent workflows before and after deployment. |
||
|
FinTesting, Debugging & Optimization Customers get a test suite covering Simulations, Regression Tests, Previews and Audience Testing, run against their own configured agent, with results readable before deployment. Sourcefin.ai/pricingread 2026-09-05 |
||
|
LorikeetTesting, Debugging & Optimization Testing covers both sides of go live. Before launch, simulations generate scenarios and test customers from the customer's own historical tickets and synthetic cases, run them in batches against a draft concierge with tool responses mocked, and a pass rate threshold agreed before anything is published; adversarial scenarios such as prompt injection and false authority claims run the same way, suites rerun after every change with side by side batch diffs, and Coach can rerun failed scenarios and compare batches. After launch, automated quality checks score every AI handled ticket Good, Warning or Critical into a Ticket Quality Score, human agent tickets can be scored once enabled, and Coach turns findings into workflow fixes that are tested in simulation and shipped with approval, with A/B experiments to compare approaches. A resolution the customer marks bad is not charged. Lorikeet also runs a public prompt injection challenge, Own Goal, against a live agent. Sourcelorikeetcx.airead 2026-11-02 |
||
| Specialist automation | ||
|
Browser & Computer Use Browser, desktop, or remote/local computer control for workflows that cannot be handled through stable APIs alone. |
||
|
FinBrowser & Computer Use Every deployment surface is a messaging, voice or API channel, and actions on external systems run through helpdesk connectors and Data Connectors. No browser control, virtual desktop or operation of software without a programmatic interface is described. Sourcefin.ai/pricingread 2026-09-05 |
||
|
LorikeetBrowser & Computer Use Work happens programmatically inside the customer's systems through controlled integrations, APIs, webhooks and MCP servers, with tool calls such as retrieving recent transactions shown as named workflow steps. No browser control, hosted session or computer use is described, and Lorikeet's public HTTP endpoints let outside AI assistants call Lorikeet rather than operate any interface. Sourcelorikeetcx.airead 2026-11-02 |
||
Pricing snapshot
Sourced from the Index pricing dataset · open each vendor's profile for full detail.
| Pricing | F Fin |
L Lorikeet |
|---|---|---|
|
Entry price Lowest public entry point |
$0.99 per outcome | Start at $2,100 per month billed annually, plus $0.99 per chat, email or SMS resolution and $1.50 per voice resolution. Scale at $5,100 per month with lower rates. Signature is custom. |
|
Pricing confidence How public the numbers are |
Public, exact | Public, exact |
|
Billing Primary billing axis |
Outcomes, at $0.99 each, plus helpdesk seats when Fin runs inside Intercom. | Resolutions, billed per resolution by channel on top of a monthly plan fee that is billed annually. |
|
Variable cost Workload / overage exposure |
High variable cost | Medium variable cost |
|
Free tier / trial Try before you buy |
No free tierTrial
|
No free tierTrial
|
|
Buying motion Self-serve vs sales call |
Mixed | Sales call |
|
Pricing verified When this pricing was last checked |
Product updates
Newest first, each linked to its source.
Fin
-
· Human approval / guardrails
When a conversation needs a review, a piece of information or an approval, Fin now loops in a human teammate to approve, edit or take over, instead of escalating and leaving.
Source -
· Observability / auditability
Intercom introduced custom reporting metrics that can be filtered by Fin AI Agent ratings or used to count escalations from AI agents to humans.
Source -
· Observability / auditability
Intercom launched Evals and Releases for Fin, providing tools to test AI agent changes before deployment, control gradual rollouts, and monitor live conversations for quality.
Source
Lorikeet
-
· MCP / tool calling / API
Lorikeet concierges now support the Personal Agent Protocol, the draft open protocol from Sierra and Meta for consumer agents, alongside A2A and WebMCP.
Source -
· Observability / auditability
Customer conversations that come from AI agents rather than people can now be flagged in Lorikeet, in beta.
Source
More comparisons with Fin or Lorikeet
Other matchups in customer support agents
Not the pairing you were after? These compare a different set of customer support agents on the same 14 capabilities.