Oliv AI
Also known as: Oliv Olivia, Oliv Oliver
Agent native revenue platform running thirty plus named agents that execute customer success and sales work directly, from health monitoring and retention forecasting to QBR drafting and continuous CRM updating.
Oliv AI is an agent-native revenue platform spanning sales, customer success and revenue operations, built around named agents that own responsibilities across the revenue lifecycle.
The agents are organized in two tiers. Olivia, positioned as chief of AI staff, dispatches the right specialist for each task. Oliver, chief GTM engineer, learns how the team operates and writes it into the Process Graph that every agent reads before acting. Beneath them sit specialists mapped to stages, from Researcher, Prospector and Quick Qualifier through Meeting Assistant, CRM Manager, Forecaster and Deal Driver to Retention Forecaster, Portfolio Manager and Coach, browsable in an agents marketplace with a request route.
Underneath sits a GTM Context Graph in named parts: Context Capture ingests meetings, emails, calls and documents automatically; the Object Graph resolves each signal onto the right account, contact and deal; the Signal Graph runs more than a hundred of Oliv's own small language models, each tuned to one revenue question; and the Process Graph holds the team's ICP, rules, handoffs and approvals. Agents run on their own clock and write back into the CRM, and when the Process Graph leaves a gap they loop in a person.
There is no public API, SDK or MCP server. Agent activity shows as a feed, with no audit log, export or retention documented. Evaluation is published as methodology for the customer to run. The trust center names SOC 2, and the privacy policy says data may be processed by personnel in the United States. Pricing is published per user by app, from $19 a month, with agent actions in credits.
Vendor details
Canonical URL
https://www.oliv.ai
Category
GTM / revenue agent
Subcategory
Agent-native revenue and customer success
Funding status
Independent, early stage. Customers named on Oliv's own homepage include Whatfix, Netsmart, AdvancedMD, Insurify, Rootly, GlossGenius, HyperVerge, TruVideo and Onyx. Implementation is delivered by Oliv's own forward-deployed GTM engineers.
Company status
independent
Use cases & customers
Primary use cases
Target customers
Deployment options
Integrations
The vendor states it works with 70+ apps on the homepage and refers to 100+ SaaS tools on its Context Capture page, with an integrations directory published. Named: Outlook and Gmail for email, telephony for calls, Microsoft Teams and Zoom for meetings, HubSpot and Salesforce for CRM, and Slack. Capture is automatic and continuous, and agents write back as well as read, with the CRM Manager updating standard and custom fields from call and activity context. No public API, SDK, webhook surface or MCP server is documented anywhere on the property, so there is no route in from a customer's own systems or assistants.
In practice
Your customer success platform only shows churn risk when someone logs in and interprets a dashboard. Agents scan accounts weekly and forecast renewal risk across the portfolio whether or not anyone opens the tool.
Quarterly business reviews eat a week of preparation per cycle. QBR Builder drafts the decks from live customer outcomes rather than requiring manual assembly.
CRM hygiene decays faster than anyone can maintain it. CRM Manager updates standard and custom fields continuously against more than a hundred qualification methodologies.
Sources & related URLs
Related / legacy domains
Agentic Index coverage score
7.0 / 14 capabilities · 50%
| Integrations & Tool Calling | Full |
|---|---|
|
Breadth across the classes a revenue team's context lives in, with authenticated write-back rather than ingestion alone. The vendor states it works with 100+ SaaS tools and publishes an integrations directory, naming Outlook and Gmail for email, phone systems for calls, Microsoft Teams and Zoom for meetings, HubSpot and Salesforce for CRM, and Slack. Agents write as well as read: the CRM Manager updates standard and custom fields continuously and the vendor's product view shows AI field suggestions accepted and auto-applied across deals with values captured from recent calls and activity. That spans email, calendar, conferencing, telephony, CRM, chat and customer success platforms. Sourceoliv.ai/integrations and oliv.ai/context-captureread 2026-09-04 |
|
| Workflow Orchestration | Full |
|
An agent workforce with a dispatcher above it, which is a different orchestration shape from workflow branching. Olivia, positioned as chief of AI staff, sees across the team and dispatches the right sub-agent for each task. Oliver, chief GTM engineer, calibrates the process the others run on, learning how the team operates and encoding it as rules in the process graph. Beneath them specialist agents own responsibilities across the whole revenue lifecycle rather than completing single tasks, and the vendor states the distinction plainly as agents that own responsibilities, not just complete tasks. Work passes between them by design, with a Hand-off Hank agent existing solely to turn sales context into customer success handoffs. The harness the vendor describes as the difference between a demo and a deployment names permissions, approvals, memory management, guardrails, monitoring and a reliability harness as the infrastructure that makes agents run in production. Agents are implemented by Oliv's own forward-deployed GTM engineers rather than configured by the customer, a service dependency the vendor presents as a benefit. Sourceoliv.ai/agents/olivia, oliv.ai/agents/oliver and oliv.ai homepageread 2026-09-04 |
|
| Knowledge Grounding & RAG | Full |
|
Grounding built as infrastructure rather than as retrieval, and documented in three named parts. Context Capture ingests every meeting, email, call and document automatically from Outlook, Gmail, phone calls, Microsoft Teams, Zoom, HubSpot, Salesforce and connected SaaS tools. The Object Graph resolves each signal onto the right account, contact, deal, renewal or expansion, including across multi-threaded deals, with the vendor's worked example joining a transcript mention, an email address, a calendar entry, a chat handle, a CRM record and a LinkedIn profile into one identified stakeholder. The Signal Graph runs more than a hundred small language models, each fine-tuned to one revenue question, reasoning over that context before a question is asked, producing named judgments including MEDDIC and MEDDPICC scoring, champion identification, economic buyer, renewal risk, churn indicators and executive sponsor health. The vendor's own framing is synthesis rather than retrieval. Sourceoliv.ai/object-graph, oliv.ai/signal-graph and oliv.ai/context-captureread 2026-09-04 |
|
| Human Oversight & Guardrails | Partial |
|
Constraints exist and are encoded, with no gate documented in front of an individual action. The Process Graph encodes the customer's rules, handoffs and approvals into how agents work, so the boundaries are set by the team rather than by generic defaults, and the agent harness names guardrails, permissions and approvals among the components the vendor says distinguish a production deployment from a prototype. The product view shows a human step on the most consequential action, with CRM field suggestions described as accepted and then auto-applied rather than written silently. None of that is documented as a mechanism a customer configures. No approval queue, confidence threshold that withholds output, blocked-action policy or escalation rule is described anywhere, the harness items are feature bullets, and the vendor's own framing is that agents own responsibilities and act rather than propose. Sourceoliv.ai/process-graph and oliv.ai homepageread 2026-09-04 |
|
| Security, Identity & Governance | Partial |
|
SOC 2 is named; access controls are not documented. Oliv runs a trust center at trust.oliv.ai, powered by Sprinto, and its compliance page names SOC 2 as a framework the company follows. No single sign-on, SAML, SCIM, role-based access control or permission model appears on Oliv's own pages, and the homepage names Audit and Security and Security and compliance only as bullet items in its agent harness without describing a control a buyer configures. Sourcetrust.oliv.ai/compliance and oliv.ai homepageread 2026-09-04 |
|
| Observability & Auditability | Partial |
|
Agent activity is visible in the product, with no audit surface documented over it. A live feed has each agent report what it did and why, and the agent harness names permissions and approvals. No run history, retention, export or audit log of agent actions is documented. Sourceoliv.airead 2026-10-01 |
|
| Memory & State Persistence | Partial |
|
A store the agents keep and read before acting. The Process Graph holds the team's rules and exceptions (ICP, approval flows, pricing logic, positioning, qualification), maintained by the Oliver agent and read by every agent before it acts. The page states no scope, lifetime, review or delete path, and much of what it holds is rules the agents apply. Sourceoliv.ai/process-graphread 2026-10-01 |
|
| Deployment & Data Residency | Not documented |
|
Hosting location and residency options are not stated on Oliv's product pages. The homepage covers context, infrastructure and talent without saying where anything runs, and no hosting location, region selection, private cloud, VPC or self-hosting option is published. A claim of regional data residency as standard appears only in an Oliv blog roundup that ranks it against rivals, and the product pages do not confirm it. Sourcetrust.oliv.airead 2026-09-04 |
|
| Prebuilt Agents, Templates & Packs | Full |
|
A browsable set of prebuilt agents. Oliv publishes an agents marketplace with See All Agents and Request an Agent routes, and the apps on the pricing page (Converse, Sell, Grow, Amplify, Engage) each carry their own agents and are bought separately, and each works without the others. Sourceoliv.ai/agents-marketplace and oliv.ai/pricingread 2026-10-01 |
|
| Triggers & Channel Coverage | Full |
|
Agents run whether or not anyone opens the product, which is the vendor's central design claim. Intake is continuous and automatic: every meeting, email, call and document is captured and written to the right account, contact and deal, across Outlook, Gmail, phone calls, Microsoft Teams, Zoom, HubSpot and Salesforce. The vendor's own product view shows agents acting on their own clock, with a live feed timestamped just now, thirty minutes ago and two hours ago, a Forecaster reporting four deals that shifted forecast category overnight, and Oliver triggering plays against six accounts that had not engaged an executive sponsor in sixty days. Outbound reaches people through the product feed, meeting prep delivered before calls, and a Rapid Responder agent that calls and qualifies inbound leads before interest cools, which is a voice channel as well as a trigger. The useful buyer test the vendor proposes is whether churn risk visibility would decrease if nobody logged in for a week, and the answer here is documented as no. Sourceoliv.ai/context-capture and oliv.ai homepageread 2026-09-04 |
|
| Model Flexibility & Routing | Not documented |
|
The vendor names itself as the model provider and offers the customer no choice. Oliv states that its Signal Graph runs more than a hundred small language models, each fine-tuned to one revenue question and reasoning over the customer's full context, and refers to them as Oliv SLMs. That is a proprietary model estate rather than an undisclosed dependency, and the homepage draws the contrast explicitly, positioning its own hosted harness against prototyping an agent in Claude. No model list beyond that description, routing policy stating which model handles which question, per-agent selection or bring-your-own-key option is published. Sourceoliv.ai/signal-graph and oliv.ai homepageread 2026-09-04 |
|
| APIs, SDKs & MCP Extensibility | Not documented |
|
Nothing lets an outside system call this platform. No public API, developer portal, endpoint reference, SDK, client library, webhook surface or MCP server is published. The native integrations bring context in and write updates back to the CRM, and free migration from Gong is a commercial offer. A sandbox at sandbox.oliv.ai lets a prospect try the product, which is a trial surface rather than a programmatic one, and the agents marketplace offers a Request an Agent route, which is a request to the vendor rather than a customer building anything. The missing interface cuts against Oliv's positioning, since the vendor markets itself as AI-native infrastructure and contrasts its harness against prototyping in Claude, yet publishes no way for a customer's own assistant or system to reach it. Sourceoliv.ai homepage and oliv.ai/integrationsread 2026-09-04 |
|
| Testing, Debugging & Optimization | Not documented |
|
Advice on how to evaluate, rather than a mechanism to evaluate with. The vendor advocates a thirty-day agent training period and holdout group measurement against net revenue retention, gross revenue retention, logo churn and lifetime value, which is sound methodology, but it is published guidance the customer runs themselves rather than tooling in the product. No evaluation harness, scored test set, benchmark, regression check when the process graph or an agent's rules change, sandbox comparison or A/B facility is published, and the onboarding arc promises measurable ROI on the first agent by week four without describing how it is measured. An element labeled Evals appears in the forecast product view on the homepage, and what it does is not explained. Sourceoliv.ai homepageread 2026-09-04 |
|
| Browser & Computer Use | Not documented |
|
Everything the agents touch arrives through an authenticated connector. Context Capture pulls meetings, emails, calls and documents from Outlook, Gmail, telephony, Microsoft Teams, Zoom, HubSpot, Salesforce and connected SaaS tools, and agents write back into the CRM through the same route. The one channel that reaches outside a connector is voice, with a Rapid Responder agent calling inbound leads to qualify them, which is a telephony action rather than operating an interface. No browser extension, headless session, portal navigation, form filling, screen or click automation is documented. Sourceoliv.ai/context-capture and oliv.ai/integrationsread 2026-09-04 |
|
The Agentic Index coverage score grades every vendor Full, Partial or Not documented against the same 14 buyer facing capabilities, from public evidence only. Each capability links to how all vendors in the index score on it. How this evidence is graded
Pricing
Converse $19 per user a month; Sell $49, Grow $79; Amplify seats $0; Engage add-on $29
per user by app, plus add-ons and agent action credits at $0.01
What is public
Every app, add-on and the credit rate are published on oliv.ai/pricing; enterprise terms are not.
Billing mechanics
Seat based and modular: each app is priced per user (Converse $19, Sell $49, Grow $79, Amplify $0), each app carries its own agents, add-ons cover Engage, channels and extra mailboxes, and agent actions are billed in credits at $0.01. Implementation is reported at seven to fourteen days with full customization in two to four weeks.
Cost watchouts
Agent actions draw credits at $0.01 each on top of seat prices; bot-based meeting capture, Slack, WhatsApp and LinkedIn capture and the dialer are $10 add-ons per user each.
Variable cost rationale
Seat based licensing with agents added modularly means cost tracks headcount and deliberate agent adoption rather than metered consumption, so spend changes only when the team chooses to add an agent or a user.
Additional watchouts
Price the apps each role needs, the capture and channel add-ons and the agent credits together.
Overage / add-ons
Agent actions are billed in credits at $0.01 each.
Sales call required
Mixed (some tiers require a call)
Free / trial
Sandbox trial and a short call; Amplify seats at $0
Lowest paid plan
Converse, $19 per user a month
Commercial notes
Seats are priced by app, with Amplify seats at $0 for wider teams; implementation is delivered by Oliv's own forward-deployed GTM engineers.
Key ambiguities
How many credits a typical agent workload consumes at $0.01 each.
Missing data
Credits consumed per agent action; enterprise terms.
Related vendors
- 11x — AI digital workers (Alice for outbound SDR work, Julian for inbound…
- 1up — AI answer engine for sales teams that automates RFPs and security…
- Actively AI — GTM superintelligence platform that trains a custom reasoning model…
- Aircover.ai — AI sales assistant that delivers real time in call coaching, a…
- AiSDR — AI SDR platform with multichannel outreach automation, quota-visible…
- Akkari — Autonomous customer ops agent that captures every commitment,…
Alternatives to Oliv AI
The closest documented capability profiles to Oliv AI among GTM and revenue agents tracked by Agentic Index, ordered by similarity on the same 14 point evidence the rankings use. No vendor pays for placement.
- TextYess6.5 / 14A lighter documented profile than Oliv AI
- Zig.ai8.5 / 14Fuller documented coverage on Human Oversight & Guardrails and Observability & Auditability
- Kleio9.0 / 14Adds documented APIs, SDKs & MCP Extensibility and Testing, Debugging & Optimization
- 11x8.5 / 14Adds documented APIs, SDKs & MCP Extensibility and Testing, Debugging & Optimization
- Actively AI7.5 / 14Adds documented APIs, SDKs & MCP Extensibility
- Aktify7.5 / 14Adds documented APIs, SDKs & MCP Extensibility
Similarity is computed from each vendor's Agentic Index coverage score evidence, axis by axis, not from the totals. How this evidence is graded