AKASA
Also known as: Unified Automation
Generative AI for the healthcare revenue cycle with institution tuned LLMs spanning coding, CDI, prior auth, and claims, deployed across Cleveland Clinic US locations with sentence level justification for every suggested code.
AKASA provides generative AI for the healthcare revenue cycle spanning prior authorization, clinical documentation integrity, coding, and claims management. Its models are institution tuned LLMs trained on clinical and financial data, reasoning over patient records that average 60 documents and 50,000 words, with some clients running all hospital billing through AI review while humans validate results.
The platform provides justifications that point reviewers to the exact sentence in the medical record supporting each suggested code. A strategic collaboration with Cleveland Clinic (announced April 2025) deploys AKASA coding and CDI tools across Cleveland Clinic's US locations, where staff previously reviewed 100+ clinical documents per case against more than 140,000 code options.
Vendor details
Canonical URL
https://akasa.com
Category
Healthcare agent
Funding status
Venture backed
Company status
independent
Use cases & customers
Primary use cases
Target customers
Deployment options
Integrations
Sits on top of existing EHR systems without requiring overhaul; deployed across Cleveland Clinic US locations in the mid revenue cycle; integration catalog not publicly documented.
Sources & related URLs
Agentic Index coverage score
6.0 / 14 capabilities · 43%
| Integrations & Tool Calling | Partial |
|---|---|
|
Sits on top of existing EHR systems without requiring an overhaul, but no integration catalog is publicly documented, AKASA materials 2026-07-22 |
|
| Workflow Orchestration | Full |
|
Unified Automation platform spans revenue cycle workflows from prior authorization through CDI, coding, and claims management, AKASA site 2026-07-22 |
|
| Knowledge Grounding & RAG | Full |
|
Institution tuned LLMs trained on clinical and financial data reason over patient records averaging 60 documents and 50,000 words, a documented site specific grounding approach, Healthcare IT Today via CEO 2026-07-22 |
|
| Human Oversight & Guardrails | Full |
|
Human reviewers validate AI output with deterministic checks and review queues, and justifications point to the exact supporting sentence in the record, AKASA materials and third party analysis 2026-07-22 |
|
| Security, Identity & Governance | Unable to verify |
|
No security certifications or identity governance documented in retrieved materials, AKASA materials 2026-07-22 |
|
| Observability & Auditability | Full |
|
Sentence level justifications for every suggested code point human reviewers to the exact supporting text, with auditable billing decisions emphasized in production design, AKASA materials and third party analysis 2026-07-22 |
|
| Memory & State Persistence | Unable to verify |
|
No documented persistent agent memory capability, AKASA materials 2026-07-22 |
|
| Deployment & Data Residency | Partial |
|
SaaS layered on existing EHR systems; no self host or residency options documented, AKASA materials 2026-07-22 |
|
| Prebuilt Agents, Templates & Packs | Partial |
|
Solution modules across coding, CDI, prior authorization, and claims management; product modules rather than an agent library, AKASA site 2026-07-22 |
|
| Triggers & Channel Coverage | Partial |
|
Coding can begin when clinical documentation completes, but the trigger surface is not documented as first class, third party platform analysis 2026-07-22 |
|
| Model Flexibility & Routing | Unable to verify |
|
Proprietary institution tuned LLMs; no customer facing model choice or routing, AKASA materials 2026-07-22 |
|
| APIs, SDKs & MCP Extensibility | Unable to verify |
|
No public developer API, SDK, or MCP surface documented, AKASA materials 2026-07-22 |
|
| Testing, Debugging & Optimization | Unable to verify |
|
Accuracy measurement and review thresholds are discussed as design considerations but no customer facing testing or evaluation tooling is documented, third party analysis 2026-07-22 |
|
| Browser & Computer Use | Unable to verify |
|
Operates on clinical and financial records within EHR workflows, not browser or computer interface control, AKASA materials 2026-07-22 |
|
The Agentic Index coverage score grades every vendor Full, Partial or Unable to verify against the same 14 buyer facing capabilities, from public evidence only. Each capability links to how all vendors in the index score on it. How this evidence is graded
Pricing
Contact sales
What is public
No public pricing. AKASA markets speed to value and cost to collect outcomes; the Cleveland Clinic collaboration is its flagship reference deployment.
Variable cost rationale
Enterprise pricing scoped to encounter volume and module coverage across coding, CDI, prior auth, and claims; no public rates.
Sales call required
Yes, required for paid access
Free / trial
None public
Related vendors
- Abridge — Enterprise ambient AI documentation platform, Best in KLAS 2025 and…
- Adonis — AI orchestration platform for revenue cycle management whose…
- Alaffia Health — Agentic AI platform for health plan claims operations that pairs…
- AlethianAI — AI native multi agent healthcare platform that automates clinical…
- Almanac Health — Research validated clinical AI platform whose Almanac Copilot acts…
- Ambience Healthcare — Enterprise AI documentation suite pairing the AutoScribe ambient…
Alternatives to AKASA
The closest documented capability profiles to AKASA among healthcare agents tracked by Agentic Index, ordered by similarity on the same 14 point evidence the rankings use. No vendor pays for placement.
- Anterior7.0 / 14Adds documented Security, Identity & Governance
- Humata Health5.0 / 14A lighter documented profile than AKASA
- Latent Health5.0 / 14A lighter documented profile than AKASA
- CodaMetrix6.5 / 14Adds documented Testing, Debugging & Optimization
- Cohere Health7.5 / 14Adds documented Security, Identity & Governance
- CombineHealth8.0 / 14Adds documented Memory & State Persistence and Model Flexibility & Routing, among others
Similarity is computed from each vendor's Agentic Index coverage score evidence, axis by axis, not from the totals. How this evidence is graded