Agentic Index
Amplemarket vs Artisan (2026)
Amplemarket and Artisan both consolidate the outbound stack around an AI agent; the split is trust model and entry price. That verdict is the Agentic Index coverage score, graded from each vendor's own published materials.
Amplemarket's Duo agents keep human verification in the loop and start at 600 dollars a month for two users on annual billing. Artisan's Ava aims for fuller autonomy inside a consolidated platform, starting free with paid tiers at 280 and 660 dollars a month on credits.
This comparison is published by Agentic Index, an independent agentic AI vendor research platform. Amplemarket and Artisan are each graded against the same 14 capability Agentic Index taxonomy, from the vendor's own public materials under the Agentic Index verification standard, alongside 956 researched vendors. No vendor pays for placement and no vendor has reviewed this page. How this evidence is graded
Choose Amplemarket if
- Verified sends are non negotiable for your brand, and Duo builds the checkpoint in.
- Signal, research, and sequencing as separate cooperating agents matches your mental model.
- You have two users ready today and the annual startup plan fits.
Choose Artisan if
- The free tier and low entry let you prove the motion before committing budget.
- Credit based scaling fits variable outbound volume across the year.
- You want maximum autonomy from Ava rather than a supervised workflow.
| At a glance | Amplemarket | Artisan |
|---|---|---|
| Category | GTM / revenue agent | GTM / revenue agent |
| Entry price | Startup $600/mo on an annual term, 2 users included, additional users purchasable. Growth and Elite are quoted, with 4 and 10 users included respectively. All plans include a free trial. | Pricing scoped per plan: Team (about 2,500 leads a month), Scale (about 6,000), Enterprise custom |
| Free / trial | — | No free plan or trial published |
| Pricing confidence | public partial | contact only |
| Feature | A Amplemarket |
A Artisan |
|---|---|---|
| Action & orchestration | ||
|
Integrations & Tool Calling Ability to connect agents to real systems through native integrations, OAuth-authenticated actions, custom tools, APIs, webhooks, or MCP-compatible tools. |
Full / Explicit | Full / Explicit |
|
Workflow Orchestration Ability to sequence, branch, retry, route, and combine deterministic workflow nodes with autonomous agent steps. |
Full / Explicit | Full / Explicit |
|
Triggers & Channel Coverage How agents wake up and where they work: schedules, webhooks, message events, CRM events, inbox events, chat, email, voice, and collaboration tools. |
Full / Explicit | Full / Explicit |
| Knowledge & context | ||
|
Knowledge Grounding & RAG Ability to ground agent behavior in company data through document ingestion, retrieval, external knowledge APIs, semantic search, or RAG layers. |
Full / Explicit | Full / Explicit |
|
Memory & State Persistence Ability to persist context across a run, conversation, workflow, user, team, or longer-term memory layer. |
Partial | Partial |
| Control & trust | ||
|
Human Oversight & Guardrails Approval steps, consent checkpoints, escalation rules, structured guardrails, policy constraints, and pause/resume controls. |
Full / Explicit | Full / Explicit |
|
Security, Identity & Governance RBAC, SSO, auditability, encryption, least-privilege tool access, compliance posture, and data handling policy. |
Full / Explicit | Full / Explicit |
|
Observability & Auditability Traces, logs, execution histories, metrics, audit events, and debugging detail for production agent behavior. |
Partial | Partial |
|
Deployment & Data Residency Deployment modes and options, including SaaS, dedicated cloud, VPC, on-prem, hybrid, local runtime, and self-hosting. |
No / Not documented | No / Not documented |
| Solution readiness | ||
|
Prebuilt Agents, Templates & Packs Ready-made workflows, packaged employees, templates, blueprints, industry solutions, and role-specific agents that reduce time-to-value. |
Full / Explicit | Partial |
| Platform extensibility | ||
|
Model Flexibility & Routing Ability to work across multiple foundation models, route tasks to different models, or let buyers bring their own providers and keys. |
No / Not documented | No / Not documented |
|
APIs, SDKs & MCP Extensibility Composability layer: stable APIs, SDKs, MCP tool consumption/serving, custom tools, and integration into internal systems. |
Full / Explicit | Full / Explicit |
|
Testing, Debugging & Optimization Testing, debugging, scoring, retries, fallbacks, quality gates, and optimization loops for improving agent workflows before and after deployment. |
Partial | Partial |
| Specialist automation | ||
|
Browser & Computer Use Browser, desktop, or remote/local computer control for workflows that cannot be handled through stable APIs alone. |
No / Not documented | Partial |
Pricing snapshot
Sourced from the Index pricing dataset · open each vendor's profile for full detail.
| Pricing | A Amplemarket |
A Artisan |
|---|---|---|
|
Entry price Lowest public entry point |
Startup $600/mo on an annual term, 2 users included, additional users purchasable. Growth and Elite are quoted, with 4 and 10 users included respectively. All plans include a free trial. | Pricing scoped per plan: Team (about 2,500 leads a month), Scale (about 6,000), Enterprise custom |
|
Pricing confidence How public the numbers are |
Public, partial | Contact only |
|
Billing Primary billing axis |
per seat subscription plus metered email and phone credits | plan scoped by leads contacted a month |
|
Variable cost Workload / overage exposure |
Medium variable cost | High variable cost |
|
Free tier / trial Try before you buy |
No free tierTrial
|
No free tier
|
|
Buying motion Self-serve vs sales call |
Mixed | Sales call |
More comparisons with Amplemarket or Artisan
Other matchups in GTM and revenue agents
Not the pairing you were after? These compare a different set of GTM and revenue agents on the same 14 capabilities.