Twin
Also known as: Twin Labs, twin.so
No-code platform for building, running and sharing autonomous AI agents from a plain language goal: 5,000+ app integrations, a Web Agent on an isolated cloud computer for sites without APIs, event and schedule triggers, approvals, a REST API and a library of 200+ ready-made agents.
Twin, from Twin Labs (founded 2024), is a platform for building, running and distributing autonomous AI agents without code. A user describes an outcome and Twin designs an agent that plans and executes the work end to end, using APIs where they exist (more than 5,000 apps connect out of the box, and Twin writes an integration where none exists) and its Web Agent, a browser on an isolated cloud computer dedicated to the agent, where they do not. Agents start from events in connected apps, on schedules or through the REST API, and can pause for the user's approval.
A workspace Orchestrator creates and coordinates several agents that share context, with the plan reviewed before anything runs. Runs keep their steps for review, run events and webhooks are exposed through a REST API with an OpenAPI schema, and usage is tracked per member and agent. The Employee Library offers more than 200 community built agents to hire as they are, and agents can be shared or sold. Pricing is by monthly credits, from a free start to Mini, Mini+, Pro and Max plans.
Vendor details
Canonical URL
https://twin.so
Category
Agent builder
Funding status
Twin Labs was founded in 2024 and announced a $10M seed round led by LocalGlobe.
Company status
independent
Use cases & customers
Primary use cases
Target customers
Deployment options
Integrations
5,000+ native app integrations, connection to any API, integrations Twin writes where none exist, and the Web Agent for sites without APIs; REST API with OpenAPI 3.1; Twin for Slack.
In practice
A founder wants a fresh list of qualified B2B prospects every morning. Twin builds an agent from a one line goal that searches the web, writes the leads into Google Sheets and runs on a schedule.
A support lead wants review replies drafted without anything posting unseen. The agent drafts each reply and posts it only after the user approves.
A team needs data from a supplier portal that has no API. Twin's Web Agent logs in on its own cloud computer, works through the pages and captures the data, and each run keeps its steps for review.
Sources & related URLs
Agentic Index coverage score
10.0 / 14 capabilities · 71%
| Integrations & Tool Calling | Full |
|---|---|
|
More than 5,000 apps connect out of the box through native integrations, agents can connect to any API, and where no connector exists Twin writes the integration itself. Agents read and write in tools such as Gmail, Google Sheets, CRMs and Slack. Sourcetwin.soread 2026-09-27 |
|
| Workflow Orchestration | Full |
|
Twin turns a goal into an agent that plans and executes the steps. The workspace Orchestrator creates, modifies and coordinates several agents that share context, proposing a plan the user reviews before anything runs. Sourcedocs.twin.so/orchestratorread 2026-09-27 |
|
| Knowledge Grounding & RAG | Partial |
|
Agents use web search, deep research and the tools they connect to per run, and workspace agents share context. There is no maintained index over the customer's own documents. Sourcedocs.twin.so/workspacesread 2026-09-27 |
|
| Human Oversight & Guardrails | Full |
|
Approvals are a named agent feature beside schedules and webhooks (an agent drafts a review reply and posts it after the user's OK). Browser automation opens a permission dialog showing the plan for the user to approve. The Orchestrator's plan is reviewed before agents are built. Sourcedocs.twin.so/web-agentread 2026-09-27 |
|
| Security, Identity & Governance | Partial |
|
Twin says it is audited and certified without naming a framework, and it links a trust center on app.bastion.tech, but it publishes no named attestation and has no security page. Access control covers only workspaces, API keys and per member credit caps, with no roles or SSO named. Sourcetwin.so/pricingread 2026-09-27 |
|
| Observability & Auditability | Full |
|
Each run keeps its steps for review (which pages the agent visited and what it captured). The REST API exposes run events, webhooks fire on run.completed and run.failed, and usage tracking shows credit consumption per member and agent. Sourcedocs.twin.so/rest-apiread 2026-09-27 |
|
| Memory & State Persistence | Partial |
|
Run Mode uses the agent's memory from previous builds, and agents in one workspace share context. Twin does not give that memory a scope, a lifetime or a way to review it. Login sessions carried between runs are browser state, not agent memory. Sourcedocs.twin.so/build-vs-runread 2026-09-27 |
|
| Deployment & Data Residency | Not documented |
|
Twin runs agents only in its own cloud, on isolated cloud computers per agent, with nothing to deploy. There is no region choice, residency option or self hosting. Sourcedocs.twin.so/guidelinesread 2026-09-27 |
|
| Prebuilt Agents, Templates & Packs | Full |
|
The Employee Library (beta) holds more than 200 ready-made agents shared by the community that a customer can hire as is, such as B2B Prospect Hunter, Niche Content Composer and SaaS Founder Signal Scout, each doing its own job. Agents can be shared publicly or sold through a store. Sourcetwin.so/agentsread 2026-09-27 |
|
| Triggers & Channel Coverage | Full |
|
Event based triggers start agents when something happens in a connected app (a new message or record), time based triggers run them on a schedule, and the REST API starts them from the customer's backend. Sourcedocs.twin.so/triggersread 2026-09-27 |
|
| Model Flexibility & Routing | Not documented |
|
The user picks high or low reasoning before a build, and runs use a lighter model. No model provider is named, and there is no provider choice or bring your own model route, so the choice is a cost tier. Sourcedocs.twin.so/build-vs-runread 2026-09-27 |
|
| APIs, SDKs & MCP Extensibility | Full |
|
A REST API at build.twin.so with an OpenAPI 3.1 schema and x-api-key authentication creates agents, triggers runs, inspects events and manages API keys. Sourcedocs.twin.so/rest-apiread 2026-09-27 |
|
| Testing, Debugging & Optimization | Partial |
|
To confirm an agent worked, the user reviews its run steps and outputs, and agents are adjusted through chat. That is debugging after a run, and there is no evaluation harness, test cases or release gate. Sourcedocs.twin.so/troubleshootingread 2026-09-27 |
|
| Browser & Computer Use | Full |
|
The Web Agent controls a browser on an isolated cloud computer dedicated to the agent, handling logins, multi step flows and dynamic pages when a service has no API or the API lacks a scope. Twin calls it the costliest and least reliable mode and recommends APIs first. Sourcedocs.twin.so/web-agentread 2026-09-27 |
|
The Agentic Index coverage score grades every vendor Full, Partial or Not documented against the same 14 buyer facing capabilities, from public evidence only. Each capability links to how all vendors in the index score on it. How this evidence is graded
Product updates
Twin dropped credit based metering and moved every plan to unlimited usage. Plus, at $29 a month, covers unlimited agents and scheduled runs across Gmail, Slack, Notion, Sheets and calendar, while Pro, at $149 a month, adds the browser agent, deep research, lead and property data sources, and image and video generation. New accounts get a 7 day free trial with no credit card.
Bears on: Pricing / packaging
View sourcePricing
Plus $29 a month, Pro $149 a month and Store from $399 a month, with no credits on any plan. A 7 day free trial with no credit card. Enterprise is custom.
A flat monthly fee per plan, with unlimited agents and scheduled runs and no credits to draw down. The plan sets the feature set, and Enterprise terms are custom.
What is public
twin.so/pricing publishes three plans and their prices (Plus, Pro and Store), a 7 day free trial with no credit card, and a custom Enterprise option booked through a demo. The docs at docs.twin.so/pricing still describe a credit system with build and run credits and top ups, in which running an agent is typically 3 to 10 times cheaper than building it and browser automation costs most.
Variable cost rationale
Nothing is metered on the current plans. Each is a flat monthly fee with unlimited agents and scheduled runs, so the bill moves only with the plan chosen. Store starts at $399 for agents run on behalf of customers, and what takes it above that floor is not published. The docs still describe credits charged as agents are built and run. Under that model the bill grows with agent activity, building costs more than running, and top ups are the only way past a tier's allocation.
Sales call required
No, self serve available
Free / trial
7 day free trial on every plan, no credit card required
Lowest paid plan
Plus at $29 per month, with unlimited agents and scheduled runs
Support SLA / resale
Enterprise is custom, with private support and commercial terms set per organization.
Related vendors
- Lindy — Lindy is an AI teammate that lives in Slack, answers from your tools…
- Activepieces — Open source, MIT licensed automation platform where every one of 700…
- Agenta — Agenta is an open source workspace where teams build AI agents by…
- AgentX — No code platform to build, evaluate, and deploy multi agent…
- AI Library — No code platform for building and running AI agents, with a…
- Aigensei — Enterprise agentic workflow platform that runs business processes…
Alternatives to Twin
The closest documented capability profiles to Twin among agent builders tracked by Agentic Index, ordered by similarity on the same 14 point evidence the rankings use. No vendor pays for placement.
- Toolhouse8.5 / 14A lighter documented profile than Twin
- Cassidy12.0 / 14Adds documented Model Flexibility & Routing
- Bizagi11.5 / 14Adds documented Deployment & Data Residency
- CodeWords10.5 / 14Adds documented Model Flexibility & Routing
- Flozic10.5 / 14Adds documented Model Flexibility & Routing
- Kalcend9.5 / 14Adds documented Model Flexibility & Routing
Similarity is computed from each vendor's Agentic Index coverage score evidence, axis by axis, not from the totals. How this evidence is graded