SuperAGI
Open-source MIT-licensed framework for building and running autonomous agents, with a graphical builder, toolkit marketplace, documented memory layer and self-hosting.
SuperAGI is a dev-first, open-source autonomous AI agent framework, released under the MIT licence, that lets developers build, manage and run autonomous agents. It belongs to the lineage of early autonomous-agent projects like Auto-GPT and BabyAGI, which proved the concept of giving an agent a goal and letting it reason out the steps; SuperAGI's contribution was to wrap that idea in something more product-like, with a graphical interface, persistent memory, and the ability to run several agents at once rather than a bare script.
An agent is given goals and instructions and works through a reasoning-and-acting loop, either freely or along a predefined workflow. Sales Engagement and Recruitment ship as worked examples, and a wait block lets a workflow pause before continuing.
Toolkits extend agents into outside systems: search through Google, DuckDuckGo, Searx and SerpAPI, developer tools through GitHub and Jira, productivity through Notion, Google Calendar and a file manager, plus email, Twitter, Instagram, Apollo.io, Google Analytics, image generation and a coding toolkit that writes specifications, code and unit tests.
Custom toolkits can be added by linking a GitHub repository, and a marketplace carries toolkits, agent templates, knowledge embeddings and models that the community can publish to.
Memory is documented rather than implied: a short-term rolling window sized to the model's token limit, a long-term summary of everything outside it, and the two combined into an Agent Summary fed into each reasoning step. Long-term memory persists in Pinecone, Qdrant, Weaviate or Redis. Customers ground agents on their own material by uploading documents through the resource manager or connecting their own vector index, then querying it with the knowledge search toolkit. Model choice is open: providers are configured in settings and picked per agent, with HuggingFace, Replicate and local models on your own GPUs all supported.
For operators, restricted mode makes the agent seek approval before critical actions like writing files or sending email, with approve, deny or give-feedback in the action console. A performance monitoring dashboard plus model, tool and knowledge consoles report runs, token consumption and logs. It self-hosts by Docker on your own machine, deploys to Digital Ocean in one click, or runs on the hosted SuperAGI Cloud.
One thing to weigh before adopting it: the project has been quiet. The most recent release, v0.0.14, landed in January 2024, and while the repository carries around 17.7k stars and a large contributor list, teams starting fresh usually compare it against more actively maintained frameworks. The same company separately sells an AI-native CRM and go-to-market platform under the SuperAGI name; that is a different product with a different buyer and is not covered by this entry.
Vendor details
Canonical URL
https://superagi.com
Category
Agent builder
Funding status
SuperAGI, Palo Alto and Bengaluru, founded 2023, Series A, $10M raised. The company also sells a separate commercial go-to-market platform, which is not this record.
Company status
independent
Use cases & customers
Target customers
Deployment options
In practice
You want to study or build on a clean autonomous-agent architecture with a GUI rather than a bare script. SuperAGI's open-source framework lets you set a goal, run agents through a ReAct loop, and monitor them in an interface.
You need to run several autonomous agents at once and watch how they perform. SuperAGI's Action Console manages concurrent agents with input and permissions, while its built-in monitoring dashboard surfaces run and organization-level metrics.
You want agents that improve over repeated runs and reach into your tools. SuperAGI stores agent memory, supports trajectory fine-tuning from feedback, and extends agents through a toolkit marketplace for systems like GitHub, Jira, and Slack.
Sources & related URLs
Related / legacy domains
Agentic Index coverage score
12.0 / 14 capabilities · 86%
| Integrations & Tool Calling | Full |
|---|---|
|
Toolkits let agents take authenticated action in outside systems across many classes: search (Google Search, DuckDuckGo, Searx, SerpAPI), developer tools (GitHub including Fetch PR and Review PR, Jira, Coding toolkit), productivity (Notion, Google Calendar, File Manager), messaging (Email with attachments), social (Twitter, Instagram), image generation (DALL-E, Stable Diffusion), sales data (Apollo.io) and analytics (Google Analytics). Credentials are configured per toolkit in the GUI with OAuth where the service requires it. Custom toolkits are documented as a first-class extension path through a linked GitHub repository, a cookie-cutter template and a community tools repository, so the catalogue is not a fixed list. Sourcegithub.com/TransformerOptimus/SuperAGI README and release notes v0.0.9 through v0.0.12read 2026-09-01 |
|
| Workflow Orchestration | Full |
|
The runtime carries the control flow rather than leaving it to the developer. Agents execute a ReAct reasoning-and-acting loop, and predefined agent workflows are selectable at provisioning as sequential instruction sets, with Sales Engagement and Recruitment shipped as worked multi-step examples. A wait block lets a workflow pause for a specified duration before continuing. A task queue provides prioritisation, a configurable max-iteration limit bounds each run, looping detection heuristics flag an agent that is stuck, and provider errors such as rate limits, authentication failures and exceeded quotas are surfaced to the operator rather than failing silently. Multiple agents run concurrently. Sourcegithub.com/TransformerOptimus/SuperAGI release notes v0.0.10 and v0.0.13, and README architecture diagramsread 2026-09-01 |
|
| Knowledge Grounding & RAG | Full |
|
The buyer points the agent at their own content and it is retrieved at run time. Files in pdf, docx, pptx, csv, txt and epub are uploaded through the resource manager, converted to vector embeddings by the LlamaIndex integration and queried by the agent through the Resource Query tool. Separately, Knowledge Embeddings can be created from the customer's own sources or installed from the marketplace, hosted in a Pinecone, Qdrant, Weaviate or Redis index the customer connects by URL, and reached at run time through the KnowledgeSearch toolkit by semantic search. A Knowledge Console logs embedding performance, queries and token consumption. Upgraded from Partial, which predated any check against the vendor's own release notes. Sourcegithub.com/TransformerOptimus/SuperAGI release notes v0.0.7, v0.0.9 and v0.0.11, superagi.com knowledge-embeddings articleread 2026-09-01 |
|
| Human Oversight & Guardrails | Full |
|
Oversight is a configurable control rather than a property of one workflow. Restricted mode is selected per agent as a permission type at provisioning, and an agent running under it must seek human approval before critical actions, with writing files, sending emails and moving to the next iteration named. Requests surface in the Action Console where the operator can Approve, Give feedback or Deny, so the buyer decides which class of action needs sign-off, who signs it off and what happens while it waits. A configurable max-iteration limit bounds a run independently of approvals. Sourcegithub.com/TransformerOptimus/SuperAGI release notes v0.0.4, v0.0.6 and v0.0.10read 2026-09-01 |
|
| Security, Identity & Governance | Partial |
|
One of the four controls a security review asks for is documented and three are not. Present: identity integration, through GitHub OAuth used both for authentication and to protect the APIs, alongside a configurable auth secret and an option to restrict list creation, and code scanning through CodeQL in the project's own pipeline. Absent: any named access model, so nothing states who inside an organisation can make an agent do what; any audit surface framed as governance rather than telemetry; and any compliance page a buyer could read, since the framework publishes no certification of its own. Downgraded from Full, which credited the GDPR, SOC 2 and HIPAA claims made by the company's separate commercial platform; those belong to that product and are not creditable here. Self-hosting means the operator supplies the surrounding controls themselves. Sourcegithub.com/TransformerOptimus/SuperAGI release notes v0.0.4 and v0.0.7, config_template.yamlread 2026-09-01 |
|
| Observability & Auditability | Full |
|
Run-level visibility is inspectable after the fact and reaches the steps and tools, not just a counter. The Agent Performance Monitoring dashboard reports organisation metrics for agents, runs and tokens, per-model breakdowns of runs and consumption, and agent-level analytics covering total runs, average tokens per run, total calls and run time. Model, Tool and Knowledge Consoles each expose their own logs, so a run can be traced through which model was called, which tools executed and which embeddings were queried. A real-time activity feed shows execution as it happens, APM retains data for deleted agents and runs, and the resource manager keeps a per-run output directory downloadable as a zip. Sourcegithub.com/TransformerOptimus/SuperAGI release notes v0.0.8, v0.0.9 and v0.0.12read 2026-09-01 |
|
| Memory & State Persistence | Full |
|
The memory layer is documented with a stated structure and lifetime. Short-term memory is a rolling window sized to the model's token limit; context falling outside it is condensed into a Long Term Summary, and the two combine into an Agent Summary passed into each reasoning step at a stated seventy-five to twenty-five weighting. Long-term memory persists in a vector database, with Qdrant added as an LTM backend alongside Pinecone, Weaviate and Redis. Tool Memory stores every tool response from a run as vectorised chunks in Redis for semantic retrieval, though the vendor states only the Thinking Tool can read it. Sourcegithub.com/TransformerOptimus/SuperAGI release notes v0.0.8, v0.0.10 and v0.0.11read 2026-09-01 |
|
| Deployment & Data Residency | Full |
|
Deployment goes well beyond shared multi-tenant software as a service. The framework is MIT-licensed and self-hosted by Docker Compose on the customer's own machine or infrastructure, with a separate GPU compose file supporting local large language models and multi-GPU execution so neither the platform nor the model need leave the environment. A one-click Digital Ocean deployment runs the image on a self-hosted cloud machine and auto-updates with each release. Storage is configurable between local disk and S3, and the database and vector store are the operator's own. A hosted SuperAGI Cloud is offered alongside for those who want it. Sourcegithub.com/TransformerOptimus/SuperAGI README installation section and release notes v0.0.4, v0.0.12 and v0.0.14read 2026-09-01 |
|
| Prebuilt Agents, Templates & Packs | Full |
|
A browsable marketplace carries toolkits, agent templates, knowledge embeddings and models, reachable from the product and at its own subdomain. Named templates aimed at named jobs are shipped rather than merely possible: SuperCoder builds end-to-end coding projects from goals and instructions, and predefined agent workflows cover Sales Engagement, fetching prospects from Apollo and drafting personalised outreach per row, and Recruitment, comparing uploaded CVs against a job description and sending shortlist or rejection mail. Customers can save templates from any run and publish them to the marketplace after a validated run, so the library grows from the community as well as the vendor. Sourcegithub.com/TransformerOptimus/SuperAGI release notes v0.0.6, v0.0.7, v0.0.10 and v0.0.12, marketplace.superagi.comread 2026-09-01 |
|
| Triggers & Channel Coverage | Partial |
|
The trigger half is genuinely met and the channel half is not. Scheduled runs are documented in detail: a one-time future run, or a recurring run at a set interval with optional expiry by deadline or by total run count, and schedules can be stopped, edited and saved, so an agent starts without a person typing. Webhooks fire outward on agent running, paused, completed, terminated and max-iterations-reached, which notifies external systems rather than starting work. What is absent is reach: the operator meets the agent only in the framework's own web interface at localhost or the hosted console, with no inbound channel from email, chat or a team tool. Email, Twitter and Instagram are outbound toolkits the agent acts through, counted on Integrations. Sourcegithub.com/TransformerOptimus/SuperAGI release notes v0.0.8 and v0.0.12read 2026-09-01 |
|
| Model Flexibility & Routing | Full |
|
Model choice is an explicit product surface. Providers are configured in account settings and a model is selected per agent from a dropdown at provisioning, with GPT-4-32k, gpt-3.5-turbo-16k and Google PaLM 2 Bison named and a model factory class built to admit more. HuggingFace and Replicate integrations let the customer bring any public or self-hosted model by entering the model name and inference endpoint, a models marketplace offers preconfigured entries, and local large language models run against the customer's own weights with multi-GPU support. Upgraded from Partial, which predated any check against the vendor's own release notes. Sourcegithub.com/TransformerOptimus/SuperAGI release notes v0.0.7, v0.0.8, v0.0.11 and v0.0.14read 2026-09-01 |
|
| APIs, SDKs & MCP Extensibility | Full |
|
Public APIs are documented and reachable from cloud or local base URLs, letting developers create, pause, resume and update agents, start runs and retrieve run details and input or output files, with API keys generated in settings and the full reference published as a Postman collection. Python and NodeJS SDK client libraries are published and installable by pip or npm with their own documentation section. User-defined HTTP callbacks are supported as webhooks on five named events: agent running, paused, completed, terminated and max iterations reached. Custom tools can be added by linking a GitHub repository from the frontend, with a cookie-cutter template and a community tools repository. Sourcegithub.com/TransformerOptimus/SuperAGI release notes v0.0.11, v0.0.12 and v0.0.13, and documenter.getpostman.com SuperAGI collectionread 2026-09-01 |
|
| Testing, Debugging & Optimization | Partial |
|
The Coding toolkit ships a Write Unit Tests tool, and the SuperCoder sequence runs WriteSpec, WriteCode, ImproveCode then WriteTest, so tests are authored against the customer's generated project. What is not documented is the tests being run and the result gating anything: nothing states that a failing test blocks delivery or is reported back, which is the difference between authoring a criterion and applying one. Everything else on this axis is after the fact, since Agent Performance Monitoring, the Model, Tool and Knowledge consoles and the activity feed report what happened and are graded on Observability. No evaluation harness, scored comparison between agent versions or preview run against a held-out set appears in any release note. Downgraded from Full, which was never checked against a vendor source. Sourcegithub.com/TransformerOptimus/SuperAGI release notes v0.0.6 and v0.0.9read 2026-09-01 |
|
| Browser & Computer Use | Partial |
|
A Web Scraping tool ships in the toolkit set for pulling data from webpages, alongside a Web Interaction toolkit, which is the published Partial case for this axis: scraping and wired-in web access rather than control of a real interface the platform drives. No hosted or local browser, desktop session or remote computer control appears in any release note or in the README toolkit list, and the search tools are API-based. Upgraded from none, which treated scraping as zero; the bar places it at Partial. Sourcegithub.com/TransformerOptimus/SuperAGI release notes v0.0.4 and README toolkit listread 2026-09-01 |
|
The Agentic Index coverage score grades every vendor Full, Partial or Unable to verify against the same 14 buyer facing capabilities, from public evidence only. Each capability links to how all vendors in the index score on it. How this evidence is graded
Pricing
OSS free · platform seat $49/user/mo
per user + credits + credit packs
Included quota
Starter: 500 credits/mo
What is public
SuperAGI publishes Free ($0/user/month), Starter ($45/user/month), Business ($150/user/month), and Enterprise (custom). The plan cards show Free with 100 credits/month, Starter with 500 credits/month, and Business with 2,500 credits/month. [27]
Billing mechanics
The same page’s billing FAQ is unusually detailed. It says a paid seat costs $49/month and is billed in full immediately when added, with no proration; a Credit Pack also costs $49/month for 2,500 credits; additional packs are billed immediately and expire at cycle end; and purchased products added mid-cycle are prorated to align with a single billing cycle. The FAQ also publishes detailed action-credit costs, including voice-agent usage at 15 credits per minute, mailbox purchase at 2,100 credits/year, and a variety of enrichment / AI-generation action costs. [27]
Cost watchouts
Company focus has shifted to the AI native GTM/CRM platform; the original open source agent framework remains available (MIT) but moves more slowly. On the platform, credits expire each cycle with no rollover, voice agents consume roughly 15 credits a minute and phone enrichment 10 credits a number, so real costs can run well past the seat price; two official pricing pages show different structures, so confirm current terms before buying.
Variable cost rationale
Credits, packs, voice usage, mailbox purchases, automatic seat purchases, and conflicting public numbers create high spend variability.
Additional watchouts
The page is internally inconsistent. The public Free card says 100 credits/month, while the FAQ says every user automatically receives 300 Credits for free each month. It also uses both $45 and $49 language around seat pricing depending on the section. SuperAGI should therefore be presented as public exact with document conflict, not as a fully settled price card. [27]
Overage / add-ons
Credit packs $49 for 2,500 credits; seat additions bill immediately; free-credit count inconsistent across page/FAQ
Sales call required
No, self serve available
Free / trial
Free
Lowest paid plan
Paid seat $49/user/mo with 2,500 credits; extra credit packs $49 per 2,500 (expire at cycle end)
Key ambiguities
Plan-card and FAQ credit counts conflict; seat price is shown as both $45 plan and $49 FAQ seat
Cancellation / refund
Seat additions and credit packs bill immediately; no proration for added seats; credits expire cycle-end
Support SLA / resale
Business includes CSM and <24h priority support; Enterprise removes API rate limits
Related vendors
- Lindy — AI teammate that lives in Slack, answers from your tools and…
- Activepieces — Open source, MIT licensed automation platform where every one of 700…
- Agent.ai — A marketplace and network of hundreds of prebuilt AI agents plus a…
- AgentX — No code platform to build, evaluate, and deploy multi agent…
- AI Library — No-code platform for building and running AI agents, with a…
- Aigensei — Enterprise agentic workflow platform that runs business processes…
Alternatives to SuperAGI
The closest documented capability profiles to SuperAGI among agent builders tracked by Agentic Index, ordered by similarity on the same 14 point evidence the rankings use. No vendor pays for placement.
- Langflow11.5 / 14A lighter documented profile than SuperAGI
- AutoGPT12.0 / 14Fuller documented coverage on Triggers & Channel CoverageSuperAGI vs AutoGPT →
- FLOWX.AI13.5 / 14Fuller documented coverage on Security, Identity & Governance and Triggers & Channel Coverage
- Gumloop13.5 / 14Fuller documented coverage on Security, Identity & Governance and Triggers & Channel Coverage
- Joget11.5 / 14Fuller documented coverage on Security, Identity & Governance
- Lyzr12.5 / 14Fuller documented coverage on Security, Identity & Governance and Testing, Debugging & Optimization
Similarity is computed from each vendor's Agentic Index coverage score evidence, axis by axis, not from the totals. How this evidence is graded