Agentic Index

Blits.ai vs Kore.ai (2026)

Kore.ai and Blits.ai take different routes to a governed service agent. That verdict is the Agentic Index coverage score, graded from each vendor's own published materials.

Kore.ai's Artemis platform defines every agent in ABL, a typed and schema driven language, enforces policies outside the language model, and pairs Arch, an AI solution architect that turns a plain language goal into agents, workflows, tools and handoffs, with Autoloop, which builds, evaluates and repairs an agent against set goals before launch and keeps doing so on live traffic. StateTrace records the full path of each session for that loop. Blits.ai builds agents on a BPMN style canvas of more than 40 flow blocks or from a written use case, grades them with test suites that use rules or an LLM judge, and holds risky actions for a person to approve. It adds digital humans and in conversation payments, and can be installed in a customer's cloud account or data center. An enterprise with engineers who want typed agent definitions and an optimization loop tied to goals will lean to Kore.ai. A regulated team in the Gulf or the EU that wants a visual builder, avatars and sovereign hosting will lean to Blits.ai.

This comparison is published by Agentic Index, an independent agentic AI vendor research platform. Blits.ai and Kore.ai are each graded against the same 14 capability Agentic Index taxonomy, from the vendor's own public materials under the Agentic Index verification standard, alongside 1,006 researched vendors. No vendor pays for placement and no vendor has reviewed this page. How this evidence is graded

Choose Blits.ai if

  • Builders should lay out conversations visually as flows of blocks.
  • Agents should take card payments in the chat or call.
  • A digital human should front the service on screens and kiosks.
  • Hosting has to be inside a cloud account your company controls.
  • Actions above a set threshold should wait for a person's approval.

Choose Kore.ai if

  • Engineers want agents written in a typed language they can review like code.
  • An optimization engine should keep fixing agents against set goals after launch.
  • An AI architect should draft the agents, tools and policies from a stated goal.
  • Policies must be enforced outside the model at run time.
  • You want every handoff, state change and tool call traced in one execution path.
Feature
B
Blits.ai
K
Kore.ai
Action & orchestration

Integrations & Tool Calling

Ability to connect agents to real systems through native integrations, OAuth-authenticated actions, custom tools, APIs, webhooks, or MCP-compatible tools.

Workflow Orchestration

Ability to sequence, branch, retry, route, and combine deterministic workflow nodes with autonomous agent steps.

Triggers & Channel Coverage

How agents wake up and where they work: schedules, webhooks, message events, CRM events, inbox events, chat, email, voice, and collaboration tools.

Knowledge & context

Knowledge Grounding & RAG

Ability to ground agent behavior in company data through document ingestion, retrieval, external knowledge APIs, semantic search, or RAG layers.

Memory & State Persistence

Ability to persist context across a run, conversation, workflow, user, team, or longer-term memory layer.

Control & trust

Human Oversight & Guardrails

Approval steps, consent checkpoints, escalation rules, structured guardrails, policy constraints, and pause/resume controls.

Security, Identity & Governance

RBAC, SSO, auditability, encryption, least-privilege tool access, compliance posture, and data handling policy.

Observability & Auditability

Traces, logs, execution histories, metrics, audit events, and debugging detail for production agent behavior.

Deployment & Data Residency

Deployment modes and options, including SaaS, dedicated cloud, VPC, on-prem, hybrid, local runtime, and self-hosting.

Solution readiness

Prebuilt Agents, Templates & Packs

Ready-made workflows, packaged employees, templates, blueprints, industry solutions, and role-specific agents that reduce time-to-value.

Platform extensibility

Model Flexibility & Routing

Ability to work across multiple foundation models, route tasks to different models, or let buyers bring their own providers and keys.

APIs, SDKs & MCP Extensibility

Composability layer: stable APIs, SDKs, MCP tool consumption/serving, custom tools, and integration into internal systems.

Testing, Debugging & Optimization

Testing, debugging, scoring, retries, fallbacks, quality gates, and optimization loops for improving agent workflows before and after deployment.

Specialist automation

Browser & Computer Use

Browser, desktop, or remote/local computer control for workflows that cannot be handled through stable APIs alone.

Pricing snapshot

Sourced from the Index pricing dataset · open each vendor's profile for full detail.

Pricing
B
Blits.ai
K
Kore.ai

Entry price

Lowest public entry point

No public price. All four plans are quoted on request and billed annually in advance. No public price. Essential, Advanced and Enterprise plans are sold through sales.

Pricing confidence

How public the numbers are

Contact only Contact only

Billing

Primary billing axis

An annual plan sized by interactions, bots, seats, channels and AI engines, with extra interactions and AI engine costs billed beyond it. Hybrid. Automation AI and Search AI bill per 15 minute session, and Contact Center AI and Agent AI bill per agent seat.

Variable cost

Workload / overage exposure

Medium variable cost Medium variable cost

Free tier / trial

Try before you buy

No free tier
Free tierTrial

Buying motion

Self-serve vs sales call

Sales call Mixed

Neither vendor shows a price. Kore.ai and Blits.ai sell enterprise plans through sales.

Other matchups in customer support agents

Not the pairing you were after? These compare a different set of customer support agents on the same 14 capabilities.

See all 136 customer support agents comparisons

Contact us

Found a vendor we missed? Have feedback on the index? We'd love to hear from you.