Back to vendors
L

LinearB

Also known as: LinearB.io, LinearB, Inc., gitStream, LinearB AI Code Review

Visit site
Entry priceEssentials at $29 a user a month, billed annually, with a minimum of 50 billable users; Enterprise at $59 a user a month with a minimum of 100.Full pricing detail

LinearB is a software engineering intelligence platform from LinearB, Inc. that now sells itself as a context layer for AI assisted development. It serves normalized delivery data to the coding agents a team already uses through an MCP server and a REST API, reviews pull requests with its own AI reviewer, and runs gitStream automations that label, route, approve and merge pull requests on GitHub, GitLab and Bitbucket. Essentials costs $29 a user a month and Enterprise $59, both billed annually.

LinearB, Inc. is a Boston company founded in 2019 by Ori Keren and Dan Lines, with an engineering affiliate in Tel Aviv, that began in engineering metrics and now describes its product as the context layer for a software factory. The platform collects data from Git, project management, incident and AI coding tools, normalizes it into linked records of contributors, pull requests, tickets, releases and incidents, and serves that context to people through dashboards and to agents through an MCP server and a REST API. Expedia, Equinix, Peloton, SurveyMonkey, Syngenta and Kraken are among the customers on its site.

Two parts of the product act on code. LinearB AI Code Review runs on each new pull request and its first pushes, posts inline findings against review guidelines kept in REVIEW_RULES.md files at the organization, team or repository level, writes pull request descriptions, and offers fixes as suggestions a developer commits; an approve on a clean review setting, off by default, lets it approve the change.

Its results flow into gitStream, LinearB's automation engine, where rules written in YAML can approve or merge a pull request, add labels and reviewers, set required approvals, request changes, run a GitHub workflow, post to Slack or call a webhook. Rules start on pull request events, commits, comments, labels and slash commands, and a managed set covers AI review, descriptions, detection of agent written code, estimated review time, missing Jira links and Dependabot approvals.

A new Agentic Studio adds an assistant that answers questions about delivery data and builds dashboard widgets, and the MCP server gives Claude Code, Cursor and other clients 25 read tools over metrics, pull requests, incidents, teams and issues.

Essentials costs $29 a user a month and covers GitHub Cloud, and Enterprise costs $59, both billed annually with minimums of 50 and 100 billable users. Plans include 1,000 or 1,500 AI credits a user each month, each automated pull request uses 100 credits, credit packs start at $67.50 a month, and a 45 day trial needs no card.

LinearB holds SOC 1 Type 2, SOC 2 Type 2 and ISO/IEC 27001:2022, supports SAML single sign on, SCIM and four roles, keeps an exportable audit log that records every MCP tool call, and runs its AI on Claude Sonnet 4.5 through AWS Bedrock without training on customer data.

The service runs on AWS with no region choice; Enterprise adds an on premises agent that collects data inside the customer's network, and gitStream can run in the customer's own CI.

LinearB fits engineering organizations of 50 developers or more on GitHub, GitLab or Bitbucket Cloud that want delivery metrics, AI review and pull request automation in one place, and that want their own coding agents to read the same delivery context through MCP. It fits less well for small teams below the user minimums, for Azure DevOps or Bitbucket Server shops where gitStream does not run, for buyers who need a choice of model or regional data residency, and for teams that want a reviewer that writes and pushes code fixes on its own.

Vendor details

Canonical URL

https://linearb.io

Category

Agent infrastructure

Subcategory

Engineering intelligence and context layer that serves delivery data to coding agents over MCP, with AI pull request review and gitStream workflow automation

Funding status

Venture backed; LinearB names a $16M Series A led by Battery Ventures in 2021, with Tribe Capital, Salesforce Ventures and 83 North among its investors.

Company status

independent

Use cases & customers

Primary use cases

serving delivery context to coding agents through MCPAI review and descriptions on every pull requestpull request labeling, routing, approval and merge with gitStreammeasuring AI coding tool adoption and impactdelivery metrics, forecasting and audit export

Target customers

engineering organizations of 50 or more developersplatform and developer experience teams rolling out AI coding toolsengineering leaders measuring AI adoption and deliveryteams on GitHub, GitLab or Bitbucket Cloud that want pull request automation

Deployment options

LinearB cloud on AWSOn premises data collection agent on Kubernetes, EnterprisegitStream inside the customer's own GitHub Actions or CI in repository modegitStream managed mode on LinearB's runner for GitHub

Integrations

GitHub including Enterprise Server, GitLab SaaS and self managed, and Bitbucket Cloud for AI review and gitStream actions; Jira and Azure Boards; Slack and Microsoft Teams through WorkerB; usage data from GitHub Copilot, Cursor, Claude Code, Amazon Q and Kiro; outbound webhooks through gitStream; more than 50 integrations in all, plus a REST API and an MCP server for agents.

In practice

A platform team connects Claude Code and Cursor to the LinearB MCP server over OAuth, so developers ask their agents for a service's open incidents, recent releases and lead time before planning a change, with each tool call recorded in the audit log.

An engineering manager turns on AI review with a REVIEW_RULES.md file in each repository; gitStream labels agent written pull requests, requires a second human approval on them, and approves Dependabot patch updates on its own.

A VP of engineering compares AI assisted and human pull requests on cycle time and cost per effective pull request in Agentic Studio, then saves the widget to the dashboard the leadership team reviews each month.

Agentic Index coverage score

10.5 / 14 capabilities · 75%

Integrations & Tool Calling Full

Agent actions land in GitHub, including Enterprise Server, in GitLab SaaS and self managed, and in Bitbucket Cloud: gitStream approves, merges and closes pull requests, adds labels and reviewers, sets required approvals, requests changes, rewrites titles and descriptions, adds checks and runs GitHub workflows, all on write scope to the code. WorkerB approves small pull requests and opens tickets from Slack or Teams on a user's own Git login, and an HTTP request action reaches any other system. Labels are unavailable on Bitbucket and required approvals on GitLab.

Sourcedocs.gitstream.cm/automation-actionsread 2026-11-08

Workflow Orchestration Full

gitStream is the workflow engine. Rules written in YAML with Jinja expressions, kept in each repository or in one organization wide repository, match conditions on a pull request and run a list of actions in sequence, halting when an action fails. The AI review is itself an action in those rules, so its results feed the steps that follow it, which label the change, request reviewers or approve it. The engine runs inside the customer's CI or on LinearB's runner, and work is not split across several agents.

Sourcedocs.gitstream.cm/how-it-worksread 2026-11-08

Knowledge Grounding & RAG Full

Delivery data from Git, Jira, Azure Boards, incident tools and AI coding tools is normalized into a persistent store that merges each contributor's identities and links every pull request to its ticket, release and incident, kept for three years on Essentials and set against benchmarks from more than 8 million pull requests. Coding agents query that store through the MCP server for metrics, pull requests, branches, releases, incidents, services, teams and issues. Source code itself is never indexed or stored, so reviews read the diff and the team's review guidelines.

Sourcelinearb.io/use-case/software-factory-context-layerread 2026-11-08

Human Oversight & Guardrails Full

Approval on a clean review is a setting that ships switched off, AI services as a whole sit behind an organization toggle only a company admin can change, and an issues limit caps how many findings one review posts. gitStream rules can require named reviewers, raise the number of approvals a pull request needs, or demand a human sign off on commits from coding agents it detects. Dry run mode and the gitStream playground show what a rule would do before it acts, and suggested fixes wait for a developer to commit them.

Sourcelinearb.helpdocs.io/article/9mpi9j3vk6-enabling-linearb-ai-servicesread 2026-11-08

Security, Identity & Governance Full

LinearB holds SOC 1 Type 2, SOC 2 Type 2 and ISO/IEC 27001:2022, listed in its trust center beside GDPR, with Drata monitoring its controls. Sign in runs through SAML single sign on with Okta, Entra, JumpCloud, OneLogin or Google across up to 15 domains, with SCIM provisioning and MFA. Admin, Editor, Viewer and Basic roles are scoped by team, MCP access over OAuth follows each user's role, and MCP API keys are for admins only. Customer data trains no models and is not shared with model providers.

Sourcetrust.linearb.ioread 2026-11-08

Observability & Auditability Full

An admin audit log exports as CSV or JSON, or through an export endpoint in the public API, and records every MCP tool call with the user, the tool, the argument names, the sign in method, the item count, the outcome and the client. Audit history is kept for one year on Essentials and for a custom period on Enterprise. Automation pages chart actions over time and pull requests processed by each rule, and the AI review dashboard tracks coverage, issues by category, issues resolved and suggested lines committed.

Sourcelinearb.helpdocs.io/article/ygz41u28cy-using-audit-logread 2026-11-08

Memory & State Persistence Partial

The Agentic Studio assistant keeps a panel of past chats, and the AI reviewer carries its state across pushes on one pull request, withdrawing its own comments once a later commit makes them outdated. Review guidelines in REVIEW_RULES.md files are rules people write rather than anything the AI reviewer retains. No memory store holds what an agent learned for a user, team or repository with a set lifetime or a way to clear it, and thumbs up and down in the assistant improve the product rather than a team's own context.

Sourcelinearb.helpdocs.io/article/z9niuhn19i-agentic-studio-assistant-homeread 2026-11-08

Deployment & Data Residency Partial

The service runs in LinearB's cloud on AWS with no choice of region or data residency. Two parts can sit closer to the customer. An on premises agent for Enterprise runs on Kubernetes inside the customer's network, collecting data and sending it on to the LinearB cloud, and gitStream in repository mode runs its rules in the customer's own GitHub Actions or CI, while AI review still calls LinearB's service. Managed mode runs on LinearB's runner for GitHub, and LinearB Ltd. in Tel Aviv processes data as an affiliate.

Sourcedocs.linearb.io/oparead 2026-11-08

Prebuilt Agents / Templates / Packs Full

An automation library and an in app marketplace offer ready made gitStream rules to adopt as they are or edit. Seven managed automations switch on without writing a rule: AI review, AI descriptions, labels that flag code written by agents, estimated review time, missing Jira links, and automatic approval of Dependabot minor and patch updates. A prompt library holds ready made MCP prompts, and catalog dashboards cover AI return on investment, engineering health and the software factory.

Sourcedocs.gitstream.cm/automations/automation-libraryread 2026-11-08

Triggers & Channel Coverage Full

Pull request events start the work: a new pull request, each commit, comments, title and description edits, labels added or removed, readiness for review, approval, merge, close and reopen. On GitHub, developers also call /gs review, /gs desc and /gs experts in a comment, and WorkerB responds in Slack and Teams. Automatic AI review runs on the first three pushes and skips drafts, bot authors and changes above 3,200 lines. Nothing inside LinearB starts agent work on a schedule; scheduled MCP prompts run in the customer's own client.

Sourcedocs.gitstream.cm/execution-modelread 2026-11-08

Model Flexibility & Routing Not documented

AI review, pull request descriptions and the assistant run on Anthropic's Claude Sonnet 4.5 through AWS Bedrock, and no setting lets a customer pick another model, route tasks between models or bring its own key. The homepage shows LinearB suggesting a cheaper model and effort level for a coding agent's task, yet none of the MCP server's 25 tools makes such a recommendation. Model choice for the customer's own coding agents stays inside those tools.

Sourcelinearb.helpdocs.io/article/uyzvby9nu1-supported-languages-in-ai-code-reviewread 2026-11-08

APIs / SDKs / MCP Extensibility Full

A public REST API takes an API key in a request header, allows 60 calls a minute on each endpoint, and covers measurements, custom metrics, deployments, incidents, services, repositories, teams, users with create, update and delete, API tokens and the audit log, so outside systems can report deployments and manage the organization. A remote MCP server signs in through OAuth or an admin key and exposes 25 tools, every one of them a read. No client libraries ship.

Sourcedocs.linearb.io/api-overviewread 2026-11-08

Testing, Debugging & Optimization Partial

The AI Playground, in closed beta for admins, runs review and description guidelines against real pull requests before they are saved. Usage metrics show how many AI findings developers resolved and how many suggested lines they committed, and AI analytics compare assisted and human pull requests on cycle time and cost per effective pull request, measuring outcomes rather than running scored test cases. gitStream dry runs show what a changed rule would do to a pull request.

Sourcelinearb.helpdocs.io/article/tuyalymj6j-ai-playgroundread 2026-11-08

Browser / Computer-use Not documented

LinearB works through Git provider APIs, Slack and Teams bots, a REST API and an MCP server. None of its agents opens a browser, drives a desktop or clicks through a web interface: the AI reviewer reads diffs, gitStream acts through provider APIs, and the assistant queries LinearB's own data. When a customer's coding agents use a browser, that work stays inside those tools and reaches LinearB only as usage data.

Sourcelinearb.io/platform/workflow-automationsread 2026-11-08

The Agentic Index coverage score grades every vendor Full, Partial or Not documented against the same 14 buyer facing capabilities, from public evidence only. Each capability links to how all vendors in the index score on it. How this evidence is graded

Pricing

Essentials at $29 a user a month, billed annually, with a minimum of 50 billable users; Enterprise at $59 a user a month with a minimum of 100.

Per billable user a month, billed annually only, where a billable user is anyone assigned to a team and bots never count, plus a shared monthly pool of AI credits that automated pull requests draw on.

Trial available

Included quota

Essentials includes 1,000 AI credits a user each month and Enterprise 1,500, pooled across the organization and reset monthly; each automated pull request uses 100 credits however many automations run on it.

What is public

Essentials and Enterprise list prices, user minimums, monthly AI credits, credit pack prices, overage rules, trial terms and plan features, with custom plans by contact.

Billing mechanics

Per billable user billed annually, plus a pooled monthly credit allowance at 100 credits per automated pull request and optional monthly credit packs.

Cost watchouts

The 50 and 100 user minimums set the real entry price at $17,400 and $70,800 a year, Essentials covers GitHub Cloud only, and heavy automation use needs credit packs.

Variable cost rationale

Seat prices are fixed per billable user, but automated pull requests draw on a shared credit pool, so organizations with heavy pull request volume buy credit packs or see automations pause at the cap.

Additional watchouts

User minimums of 50 and 100, annual billing only, and GitHub Cloud only on Essentials.

Overage / add-ons

Credit packs add 5,000 credits for $67.50 a month or 10,000 for $125. In any two months a year usage may run to 120 percent of the pool at no charge, the cap is waived in the first two months, and automations pause once the cap is reached.

Sales call required

Mixed (some tiers require a call)

Free / trial

A 45 day trial with no card, started through a request on the pricing page; no free plan is listed.

Lowest paid plan

Essentials at $29 a user a month, billed annually

Commercial notes

LinearB, Inc. sells directly and through AWS Marketplace, with a 45 day trial before an annual contract.

Key ambiguities

The pricing page prices extra credits from $0.015 while the credits page lists $0.0135 and $0.0125, pricing still names a retired Business plan, the unit reads user a month on pricing and contributor a month elsewhere on the site, and the gitStream docs still describe free accounts with 250 pull requests a month though no free plan is sold.

Cancellation / refund

Annual subscriptions only; Enterprise and custom plans are negotiated contracts.

Support SLA / resale

Enterprise adds unlimited admins, on premises agents, Slack and Teams automations, forecasting and cost capitalization, with custom plans through sales.

Missing data

Custom plan pricing and terms beyond the two published plans.

Agentic Index verified 2026-11-08

Contact us

Found a vendor we missed? Have feedback on the index? We'd love to hear from you.