Back to vendors
T

ThinkReview

Also known as: thinkreview.dev, Thinkode AI, ThinkReview MCP, ThinkReview AI Copilot

Visit site
Entry priceFree with 30 review credits a month. Lite is $15 a month for 200 credits and Professional $30 a month for 600.Full pricing detail

AI code review that opens in a private sidebar beside the diff on GitHub, GitLab, Azure DevOps and Bitbucket, in the cloud or self hosted. The review engine pulls related files, linked issues and overlapping pull requests through its own tool calls, runs up to ten custom review agents in parallel, and posts a finding only when a reviewer clicks Post. An MCP server and a Cursor plugin bring the same review into coding assistants. Free with 30 credits a month, paid plans from $15.

ThinkReview is an AI code reviewer built for the person who approves a pull request. It installs as a browser extension for Chrome, Firefox, Edge and other Chromium browsers and opens a review panel beside the diff on GitHub, GitLab, Azure DevOps and Bitbucket, including GitHub Enterprise Server, self managed GitLab, Azure DevOps Server and Bitbucket Data Center. Setup needs no admin approval, webhook, bot account or CI job. The extension is open source under AGPL 3.0, and a web portal holds the team's rules, agents, model choices and git connections.

A review starts when someone opens it on a pull request. With a git connection in place, through a GitHub App, GitLab OAuth or a personal access token, the cloud engine makes its own tool calls to the code host during the review. It pulls related files, base branch content, linked issues, the pull request's commits and comments, and other open pull requests that touch the same files, and it can check outside facts such as library versions and advisories on the live web. Findings arrive in a severity or scoring layout with file and line ranges, three suggested follow up questions and a chat about the change.

Up to ten custom review agents, each with a goal, a scope, reference material and a condition for when it runs, work in parallel with the main review and fill their own tabs. Custom rules add up to ten security checks and ten best practice checks to every review. Nothing reaches the pull request until a reviewer clicks Post on a finding, and ThinkReview cannot approve, merge or block. The same review reaches Cursor, Claude Code, Claude Desktop and VS Code Copilot through an MCP server and a Cursor plugin, and deeplinks hand a fix to those editors.

Plans run on review credits. Free includes 30 a month, Lite is $15 a month for 200 and Professional $30 a month for 600. Teams carries the same 600 credits, a higher daily cap and the Enterprise Gateway, and is arranged with ThinkReview directly. A new review or an agent run costs one credit times the chosen model's multiplier, and credit packs cover overflow.

Cloud reviews run on Google Cloud through Anthropic, OpenAI, Google and OpenRouter, with diffs processed in memory and discarded and chat history kept up to 90 days. Users pick and block models across the Claude, GPT, Gemini, Grok, Kimi and Qwen families, or run reviews on Ollama. The Enterprise Gateway runs in Docker or Azure Container Apps so diffs, git credentials and model traffic stay in the customer's network. Accounts sign in with Google, with no SSO, team roles, audit log or named security attestation.

It fits reviewers and small teams who want a private second opinion on each pull request without a bot in the thread, teams on self hosted GitLab, Azure DevOps Server or Bitbucket Data Center who cannot add webhooks, and organizations that need review traffic to stay inside their own network. It fits less well for teams that want every pull request reviewed automatically, a reviewer that learns from past feedback, or SSO, roles and audit logs across an organization.

Vendor details

Canonical URL

https://thinkreview.dev

Category

Coding agent

Subcategory

Reviewer side AI code review in a private pull request sidebar, with custom review agents, an MCP server and a self hosted gateway

Funding status

Independent. Thinkreview Ltd, a UK company (number 17353358) based in Liverpool, operates ThinkReview, and the extension and Cursor plugin are published under the Thinkode name on GitHub. Funding is not stated on ThinkReview's own pages.

Company status

independent

Use cases & customers

Primary use cases

AI review of pull and merge requests beside the diffsecurity and best practice checks on every pull requestspecialist review agents for security, performance and migrationspull request review from Cursor, Claude Code and Copilot over MCPprivate review traffic inside the customer's network

Target customers

engineers who review pull and merge requestssmall and mid sized engineering teamsteams on self hosted GitLab, Azure DevOps Server or Bitbucket Data Centersecurity conscious teams that keep code inside their network

Deployment options

Browser extension for Chrome, Firefox, Edge, Brave and other Chromium browsersThinkReview cloud on Google CloudSelf hosted Enterprise Gateway in Docker or Azure Container Apps (Teams)Local Ollama on the user's own machine, including air gapped useHosted MCP server and Cursor plugin

Integrations

ThinkReview works on GitHub, GitLab, Azure DevOps and Bitbucket, in the cloud and on GitHub Enterprise Server, self managed GitLab, Azure DevOps Server and Bitbucket Data Center. The cloud review connects to code hosts through a GitHub App, GitLab OAuth or personal access tokens and reads files, issues and other open pull requests while it reviews. Chosen findings post as comments on GitHub, GitLab and Azure DevOps. The MCP server works in Cursor, Claude Code, Claude Desktop and VS Code Copilot, a Cursor plugin installs from the Cursor Directory, and deeplinks send a fix to Cursor, Claude Code or Copilot. Models come from Anthropic, OpenAI, Google and OpenRouter, or from Ollama and any OpenAI compatible endpoint through the gateway.

In practice

Your team runs self managed GitLab and cannot add webhooks or a bot account. Reviewers install the extension, add the GitLab domain and get severity ranked findings beside each merge request, posting only the comments worth the author's time.

Security wants OWASP style checks on every change without a second workflow. A pen tester review agent with OWASP references runs in parallel with the main review on each pull request and fills its own tab with findings the reviewer can post or skip.

A developer in Cursor wants a review before asking for approval. The ThinkReview plugin sends the pull request link to the hosted review, which reads the changes and the surrounding repository, and Cursor gets back a summary, suggestions and security notes to act on.

Agentic Index coverage score

8.5 / 14 capabilities · 61%

Integrations & Tool Calling Partial

Reviews read from GitHub, GitLab, Azure DevOps and Bitbucket, in the cloud or self hosted, through a GitHub App, GitLab OAuth or a personal access token stored encrypted in the portal. During a review the model calls the code host's API itself to fetch related files, base branch content, linked issues, commit and comment history, and other open pull requests touching the same files. Writing back stays with a person, who posts chosen findings as comments on GitHub, GitLab or Azure DevOps with one click each, and deeplinks hand a fix to Cursor, Claude Code or Copilot.

Sourcethinkreview.dev/release-notes/cloud-v2.4.0read 2026-11-01

Workflow Orchestration Full

Each review runs a main analysis while up to ten custom review agents work in parallel in the cloud, each filling its own tab, and the panel can be closed while they finish. Every agent carries its own goal, scope and reference material, plus a run condition that fires it on every review or only when the project or stack matches. Inside a review the model calls tools across several steps to gather repository context, and a failed model call is rerouted up to three times to another allowed model, often one with a larger context window.

Sourcethinkreview.dev/docs/review-agentsread 2026-11-01

Knowledge Grounding & RAG Partial

Context is gathered fresh for each review. The model pulls related files, imports, base branch content, linked issue text, project structure, the pull request's history and overlapping open pull requests from the code host, and it can look up library versions, model and API names, advisories and changelogs on the live web when a finding depends on them. Review agents add reference material such as OWASP guidance or internal standards by link. Source code is never stored or indexed, so no retrieval index is kept over a customer's repositories or documents.

Sourcethinkreview.dev/release-notes/cloud-v2.4.0read 2026-11-01

Human Oversight & Guardrails Full

The review stays in a private panel that only the person reviewing sees. Each finding has its own Post control, so they publish the ones worth sharing, post a generated comment or skip the rest, and nothing lands on the pull request until then. Comments post under the user's own name on GitLab and Azure DevOps, or as ThinkReview through the GitHub App. ThinkReview cannot approve, merge or block a change, and the MCP review and the Cursor plugin return findings to the assistant without posting anything to the code host.

Sourcethinkreview.dev/blog/2026-09-18-post-review-findings-as-pr-commentsread 2026-11-01

Security, Identity & Governance Not documented

Users sign in with Google OAuth, git tokens are encrypted at rest with keys derived server side and decrypted only in memory during a review, and traffic runs over TLS. Accounts are individual, with no organization roles, SSO, SAML, SCIM or audit log for an administrator to manage. No SOC 2 or ISO 27001 report is named, and a data processing agreement stating zero code retention is offered on request. On the self hosted gateway, an optional extension token mode limits which clients can call it.

Sourcethinkreview.dev/privacy-policyread 2026-11-01

Observability & Auditability Partial

Users see how many credits they used this month and today, and when the pool resets, in the extension menu and on the portal's usage card. Pull request URLs, review counts and timestamps are kept for each account, each user's past reviews reopen from cache, and the self hosted gateway reports engine readiness, configuration version and secret status on a health endpoint. A review keeps no trace of which files it fetched or which tools it called, and there is no audit log of what users or agents did across an organization.

Sourcethinkreview.dev/docs/billing-review-creditsread 2026-11-01

Memory & State Persistence Partial

A review chat sends the current patch, the original review summary and the last 6 to 11 messages to the model, depending on the model, and keeps that history in the browser during the session, with server copies held up to 90 days for operations. Each user's finished reviews are cached against a fingerprint of the changes and the pull request ID, survive browser restarts and are reused until the code changes. Rules and agents shape every review, and nothing learned from one pull request or from a reviewer's feedback carries into the next.

Sourcethinkreview.dev/docs/conversational-reviewsread 2026-11-01

Deployment & Data Residency Full

Cloud reviews run on Google Cloud, where diffs are processed in memory and discarded. On the Teams plan, the Enterprise Gateway runs inside the customer's network as a container on a virtual machine with Docker Compose or in Azure Container Apps, keeping diffs, repository tool results, git tokens and model keys on the customer's side, while accounts, billing, agents and signed review bundles come from ThinkReview's cloud on a six hour heartbeat. Local Ollama keeps the patch on the user's own machine, including air gapped use, with only a usage count sent.

Sourcethinkreview.dev/docs/self-hosted-gatewayread 2026-11-01

Prebuilt Agents / Templates / Packs Partial

Teams build their own review agents from a goal, a scope and reference material, up to ten per account, and ThinkReview suggests niche agents drafted from the stack signals of projects a user reviews, ready to switch on. Custom rules come from a predefined list of security checks, such as cross site scripting and sensitive data exposure, and a list of best practice checks, up to ten of each, with room for the team's own. There is no catalog of ready made review agents to adopt by name.

Sourcethinkreview.dev/docs/custom-rulesread 2026-11-01

Triggers & Channel Coverage Partial

Work starts when a person asks for it. A reviewer opens the review panel on a pull or merge request page on any of the four code hosts, runs a URL review from the portal, or asks Cursor, Claude Code, Claude Desktop or VS Code Copilot to call the hosted review over MCP, where a Cursor skill routes any pull request link to it. After new commits, the next request produces a fresh review on its own. No webhook, schedule or pull request event starts a review, and the hosted engine calls tools only inside a review someone requested.

Sourcethinkreview.dev/docs/mcp-integrationread 2026-11-01

Model Flexibility & Routing Full

Users choose preferred models in the portal and block others from use, and each review tries the chosen models first within the plan's tier and the size of the patch. The lineup spans Claude, GPT, Gemini, Grok, Kimi, Qwen, MiniMax and Devstral models through Anthropic, OpenAI, Google and OpenRouter, and pricier models cost more credits per action. An Ollama Cloud key can run hosted, follow up and MCP reviews on the customer's own models, and the Enterprise Gateway points at any OpenAI compatible endpoint the customer runs, such as Azure OpenAI or vLLM.

Sourcethinkreview.dev/docs/model-selectionread 2026-11-01

APIs / SDKs / MCP Extensibility Full

A hosted MCP server at mcp.thinkreview.dev/v1 signs in with OAuth or a portal bearer token and offers one tool, review_url_code, which takes a pull or merge request URL with optional language, tracking ID and force regenerate arguments. Each call runs a full hosted review with the account's custom rules, caches the result and draws on the same credits as the extension. A Cursor plugin on the Cursor Directory packages the server with a review skill. Custom review agents do not run over MCP, and the hosted review endpoints have no published API reference.

Sourcethinkreview.dev/docs/mcp-integrationread 2026-11-01

Testing, Debugging & Optimization Partial

Before a finding is reported, a connected review looks through the repository for how the change is used and whether the issue is already handled elsewhere, which cuts findings that ignore the rest of the codebase. A reviewer can regenerate a review for a second opinion and rate it, and the scoring layout grades the change itself on quality, security and best practices. Teams get no test cases, shadow mode or harness to check a review agent or a rule change against past pull requests before it goes live.

Sourcethinkreview.dev/release-notes/cloud-v2.4.0read 2026-11-01

Browser / Computer-use Not documented

The review lives in a browser but never drives one. The extension reads the patch from the open pull request page, and the cloud engine reaches code hosts through their APIs with stored credentials. The panel displays findings for a person to read, and posting a comment is a single call that person triggers. Nothing in the product clicks, types or navigates through a web page or a desktop application on its own, and the MCP review runs entirely through the hosted engine.

Sourcethinkreview.dev/docs/github-integrationread 2026-11-01

The Agentic Index coverage score grades every vendor Full, Partial or Not documented against the same 14 buyer facing capabilities, from public evidence only. Each capability links to how all vendors in the index score on it. How this evidence is graded

Product updates

·Pricing / packagingVerified

Review usage in ThinkReview version 2.3.14 now runs on a monthly credit pool plus a daily burst cap. When a user hits a limit, the upgrade screen says which one, how many credits have been used and when they reset, with options that match the plan: Free, Lite, Professional or Teams. Monthly and daily usage meters also sit in the review panel's settings menu.

Bears on: Pricing / packaging

View source
View all ThinkReview updates →Tracked since Oct 2026 · Verified from public vendor sources

Pricing

Free with 30 review credits a month. Lite is $15 a month for 200 credits and Professional $30 a month for 600.

A subscription per user with a monthly review credit pool and a daily cap, plus prepaid credit packs.

Free tier

Included quota

Free includes 30 credits a month and 10 a day, Lite 200 a month and 50 a day, Professional 600 a month and 50 a day, and Teams 600 a month and 100 a day. Each pool resets on the plan's anniversary day every month, including on annual plans, and the same pool covers the extension, the portal and MCP reviews.

What is public

The Free, Lite and Professional plans with prices and credit pools, the daily cap on every plan, how each action and model is charged in credits, and what Teams adds.

Billing mechanics

Each user subscribes monthly or annually and spends review credits from a monthly pool under a daily cap, and credit packs extend either limit. Teams accounts are provisioned with ThinkReview, and the Enterprise Gateway arrives with a license key and tenant ID.

Cost watchouts

Each enabled review agent costs a credit per pull request on top of the main review, and premium models multiply every action, so a team running several agents on large models can use a Lite pool within days.

Variable cost rationale

The plan price is flat, but every review, regenerate, agent run and chat message draws credits multiplied by the chosen model, so premium models and more review agents per pull request use the pool faster. The daily cap and prepaid packs bound spend, and there is no automatic overage.

Additional watchouts

Free plan models do not apply custom rules, self hosted GitLab domains need Lite or above, and the Enterprise Gateway is available only on Teams.

Overage / add-ons

Credit packs pay for reviews once the monthly pool or the daily cap runs out, last one year from purchase and do not count against the daily cap. A new review or agent run costs one credit times the model's multiplier, a regenerate half of that and a chat message a fifth.

Sales call required

Mixed (some tiers require a call)

Free / trial

Free plan with 30 review credits a month and 10 a day on standard models, without custom rules. A Teams trial with the Enterprise Gateway is available on request.

Lowest paid plan

Lite, $15 a month for 200 review credits

Commercial notes

Installing the browser extension and the Cursor plugin is free. Payments run through LemonSqueezy, and a data processing agreement stating zero code retention is available on request.

Key ambiguities

Plan prices load from a live pricing service and are taken from the extension's own pricing configuration and the credit docs. A September 2026 comparison post quoted Lite at $9 and Professional at $14, figures the current $15 and $30 plans replace. Teams, annual and credit pack prices are not shown.

Support SLA / resale

Professional includes priority support.

Missing data

Teams, annual and credit pack prices, and cancellation and refund terms.

Agentic Index verified 2026-11-01

Contact us

Found a vendor we missed? Have feedback on the index? We'd love to hear from you.