Agentic Index

Qevlar AI vs Radiant Security (2026)

Qevlar AI and Radiant Security both investigate the alerts a SOC's tools raise and neither publishes a price. That verdict is the Agentic Index coverage score, graded from each vendor's own published materials.

Qevlar is built for reproducible investigations, and Radiant for triage beside a log store. Qevlar is a Paris company whose core reasoning runs in a graph orchestrator rather than a language model, aimed at reproducible tier two and three investigations in about three minutes, and it says it runs at more than 1,500 organizations, many through managed security providers. Radiant pairs triage with integrated log management as a SIEM cost alternative; Cribl acquired the technology behind the product in August 2026, though Radiant's site still sells it. On the grid Qevlar is Full on deployment, observability and security where Radiant is Partial or unknown; Radiant is Full on human oversight, with analyst confirmed response actions, where Qevlar is Partial. Choose Qevlar for reproducible, documented investigation; choose Radiant if analyst sign off on every action and a bundled log store matter most.

On the Agentic Index AI SOC ranking, neither Qevlar AI nor Radiant Security clears the bar, which asks for all five investigation loop capabilities documented in full. Qevlar AI does not document workflow orchestration in full, nor human oversight and guardrails; Radiant Security does not document workflow orchestration in full, nor observability and auditability. 23 of the 85 vendors in the lane clear it. See the AI SOC ranking

This comparison is published by Agentic Index, an independent agentic AI vendor research platform. Qevlar AI and Radiant Security are each graded against the same 14 capability Agentic Index taxonomy, from the vendor's own public materials under the Agentic Index verification standard, alongside 955 researched vendors. No vendor pays for placement and no vendor has reviewed this page. How this evidence is graded

Choose Qevlar AI if

  • Investigations should be reproducible, with reasoning in a graph rather than a language model.
  • You run or buy through a managed security provider.
  • Deployment and security must be documented in full; Qevlar is Full on both.

Choose Radiant Security if

  • Every response action should wait for an analyst to confirm it; Radiant is Full on oversight and Qevlar Partial.
  • Integrated log management could offset SIEM spend.
  • The Cribl transition fits your telemetry plans.
Feature
Q
Qevlar AI
R
Radiant Security
Action & orchestration

Integrations & Tool Calling

Ability to connect agents to real systems through native integrations, OAuth-authenticated actions, custom tools, APIs, webhooks, or MCP-compatible tools.

Workflow Orchestration

Ability to sequence, branch, retry, route, and combine deterministic workflow nodes with autonomous agent steps.

Triggers & Channel Coverage

How agents wake up and where they work: schedules, webhooks, message events, CRM events, inbox events, chat, email, voice, and collaboration tools.

Knowledge & context

Knowledge Grounding & RAG

Ability to ground agent behavior in company data through document ingestion, retrieval, external knowledge APIs, semantic search, or RAG layers.

Memory & State Persistence

Ability to persist context across a run, conversation, workflow, user, team, or longer-term memory layer.

Control & trust

Human Oversight & Guardrails

Approval steps, consent checkpoints, escalation rules, structured guardrails, policy constraints, and pause/resume controls.

Security, Identity & Governance

RBAC, SSO, auditability, encryption, least-privilege tool access, compliance posture, and data handling policy.

Observability & Auditability

Traces, logs, execution histories, metrics, audit events, and debugging detail for production agent behavior.

Deployment & Data Residency

Deployment modes and options, including SaaS, dedicated cloud, VPC, on-prem, hybrid, local runtime, and self-hosting.

Solution readiness

Prebuilt Agents, Templates & Packs

Ready-made workflows, packaged employees, templates, blueprints, industry solutions, and role-specific agents that reduce time-to-value.

Platform extensibility

Model Flexibility & Routing

Ability to work across multiple foundation models, route tasks to different models, or let buyers bring their own providers and keys.

APIs, SDKs & MCP Extensibility

Composability layer: stable APIs, SDKs, MCP tool consumption/serving, custom tools, and integration into internal systems.

Testing, Debugging & Optimization

Testing, debugging, scoring, retries, fallbacks, quality gates, and optimization loops for improving agent workflows before and after deployment.

Specialist automation

Browser & Computer Use

Browser, desktop, or remote/local computer control for workflows that cannot be handled through stable APIs alone.

Pricing snapshot

Sourced from the Index pricing dataset · open each vendor's profile for full detail.

Pricing
Q
Qevlar AI
R
Radiant Security

Entry price

Lowest public entry point

Contact sales; enterprise and MSSP contracts, no public rates Contact sales; enterprise contracts with optional integrated log management

Pricing confidence

How public the numbers are

Contact only Contact only

Billing

Primary billing axis

enterprise contract (MSSP packaging) enterprise contract

Variable cost

Workload / overage exposure

Low variable cost Low variable cost

Free tier / trial

Try before you buy

No free tierTrial
No free tierTrial

Buying motion

Self-serve vs sales call

Sales call Sales call

Cribl acquired the technology and intellectual property behind Radiant's AI SOC product in August 2026 and plans to run it as an application on its telemetry platform. Radiant's own site still sells the product and does not mention the deal, so ask who will support the contract and on what roadmap.

Contact us

Found a vendor we missed? Have feedback on the index? We'd love to hear from you.