Agentic Index
Cyware vs Torq (2026)
Cyware and Torq both modernize security operations tooling with distinct anchors: Cyware leads from threat intelligence, its modular Intel Exchange, Respond SOAR, and collaborative response components licensing together or separately with AI optional throughout, serving enterprises and MSSPs that live on intel workflows, while Torq leads from hyperautomation, enterprise contracts scaling with workflow volume and connected tools, with HyperSOC putting agentic AI on case triage and response. Intel driven security programs get more from Cyware; automation driven programs replacing legacy SOAR and manual runbooks get more from Torq.
| At a glance | Cyware | Torq |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Security / SOC agent | Security / SOC agent |
| Entry price | Contact sales (modular components) | Contact sales; enterprise contracts scaling with workflow volume and scope |
| Free / trial | No public free tier; demo request. AI features optional and admin controllable | Enterprise evaluations through sales; community and trial tiers reported historically, not confirmed current |
| Pricing confidence | contact only | contact only |
| Feature |
C
Cyware
|
T
Torq
|
|---|---|---|
| Action & orchestration | ||
|
Integrations & Tool Calling Ability to connect agents to real systems through native integrations, OAuth-authenticated actions, custom tools, APIs, webhooks, or MCP-compatible tools. |
Full / Explicit | Full / Explicit |
|
Workflow Orchestration Ability to sequence, branch, retry, route, and combine deterministic workflow nodes with autonomous agent steps. |
Full / Explicit | Full / Explicit |
|
Triggers & Channel Coverage How agents wake up and where they work: schedules, webhooks, message events, CRM events, inbox events, chat, email, voice, and collaboration tools. |
Full / Explicit | Full / Explicit |
| Knowledge & context | ||
|
Knowledge Grounding & RAG Ability to ground agent behavior in company data through document ingestion, retrieval, external knowledge APIs, semantic search, or RAG layers. |
Full / Explicit | Partial |
|
Memory & State Persistence Ability to persist context across a run, conversation, workflow, user, team, or longer-term memory layer. |
Partial | Partial |
| Control & trust | ||
|
Human Oversight & Guardrails Approval steps, consent checkpoints, escalation rules, structured guardrails, policy constraints, and pause/resume controls. |
Full / Explicit | Full / Explicit |
|
Security, Identity & Governance RBAC, SSO, auditability, encryption, least-privilege tool access, compliance posture, and data handling policy. |
Full / Explicit | Full / Explicit |
|
Observability & Auditability Traces, logs, execution histories, metrics, audit events, and debugging detail for production agent behavior. |
Full / Explicit | Full / Explicit |
|
Deployment & Data Residency Deployment modes and options, including SaaS, dedicated cloud, VPC, on-prem, hybrid, local runtime, and self-hosting. |
Full / Explicit | Partial |
| Solution readiness | ||
|
Prebuilt Agents, Templates & Packs Ready-made workflows, packaged employees, templates, blueprints, industry solutions, and role-specific agents that reduce time-to-value. |
Full / Explicit | Full / Explicit |
| Platform extensibility | ||
|
Model Flexibility & Routing Ability to work across multiple foundation models, route tasks to different models, or let buyers bring their own providers and keys. |
Partial | No / Not documented |
|
APIs, SDKs & MCP Extensibility Composability layer: stable APIs, SDKs, MCP tool consumption/serving, custom tools, and integration into internal systems. |
Full / Explicit | Full / Explicit |
|
Testing, Debugging & Optimization Testing, debugging, scoring, retries, fallbacks, quality gates, and optimization loops for improving agent workflows before and after deployment. |
Partial | Partial |
| Specialist automation | ||
|
Browser & Computer Use Browser, desktop, or remote/local computer control for workflows that cannot be handled through stable APIs alone. |
Partial | No / Not documented |
Pricing snapshot
Sourced from the Index pricing dataset · open each vendor's profile for full detail.
| Pricing |
C
Cyware
|
T
Torq
|
|---|---|---|
|
Entry price Lowest public entry point |
Contact sales (modular components) | Contact sales; enterprise contracts scaling with workflow volume and scope |
|
Pricing confidence How public the numbers are |
Contact only | Contact only |
|
Billing Primary billing axis |
modular components (TIP, SOAR, threat sharing); AI features optional | enterprise contract (workflow volume and scope) |
|
Variable cost Workload / overage exposure |
Medium variable cost | Medium variable cost |
|
Free tier / trial Try before you buy |
No free tier
|
No free tier
|
|
Buying motion Self-serve vs sales call |
Sales call | Sales call |
Choose Cyware if
- Threat intel collection, enrichment, and distribution anchor your operations.
- Component level licensing matches a phased modernization budget.
- MSSP or multi organization intel sharing is a requirement.
Choose Torq if
- Replacing legacy SOAR with modern hyperautomation is the project.
- Agentic case handling through HyperSOC is the capability jump you want.
- Workflow scoped enterprise contracts fit your automation roadmap.