Agentic Index

Cyware vs Torq (2026)

Cyware and Torq both put AI agents over mature security automation, and Torq documents more of the grid, 12.5 of 14 against 10. That verdict is the Agentic Index coverage score, graded from each vendor's own published materials.

Cyware's strength is threat intelligence: Intel Exchange, a Collaboration Suite for ISACs and CERTs, and Quarterback AI agents that research threats, triage alerts and write detections under customer defined approvals, with an open source MCP server; pricing is scoped per engagement. Torq started as security hyperautomation and added HyperSOC agentic operations on its workflow fabric, with no public price. Both are Full on knowledge grounding, deployment, human oversight and workflow orchestration. On the grid Torq is Full on model choice, security and testing and Partial on memory where Cyware is None or Partial. Choose Cyware when intelligence sharing is central; choose Torq for the broader documented automation platform.

On the Agentic Index AI SOC ranking, Cyware and Torq both clear the bar: each documents all five investigation loop capabilities in full. 23 of the 85 vendors in the lane clear it. See the AI SOC ranking

This comparison is published by Agentic Index, an independent agentic AI vendor research platform. Cyware and Torq are each graded against the same 14 capability Agentic Index taxonomy, from the vendor's own public materials under the Agentic Index verification standard, alongside 955 researched vendors. No vendor pays for placement and no vendor has reviewed this page. How this evidence is graded

Choose Cyware if

  • Intelligence management and sharing networks are core to your work.
  • Agents should write detections and map attack flows from your intelligence.
  • An open source MCP server fits your tooling.

Choose Torq if

  • Model choice, security and testing must be documented in full; Torq is Full on all three.
  • You want agentic operations built on a hyperautomation fabric.
  • Memory across runs should be documented; Torq is Partial and Cyware None.
Feature
C
Cyware
T
Torq
Action & orchestration

Integrations & Tool Calling

Ability to connect agents to real systems through native integrations, OAuth-authenticated actions, custom tools, APIs, webhooks, or MCP-compatible tools.

Workflow Orchestration

Ability to sequence, branch, retry, route, and combine deterministic workflow nodes with autonomous agent steps.

Triggers & Channel Coverage

How agents wake up and where they work: schedules, webhooks, message events, CRM events, inbox events, chat, email, voice, and collaboration tools.

Knowledge & context

Knowledge Grounding & RAG

Ability to ground agent behavior in company data through document ingestion, retrieval, external knowledge APIs, semantic search, or RAG layers.

Memory & State Persistence

Ability to persist context across a run, conversation, workflow, user, team, or longer-term memory layer.

Control & trust

Human Oversight & Guardrails

Approval steps, consent checkpoints, escalation rules, structured guardrails, policy constraints, and pause/resume controls.

Security, Identity & Governance

RBAC, SSO, auditability, encryption, least-privilege tool access, compliance posture, and data handling policy.

Observability & Auditability

Traces, logs, execution histories, metrics, audit events, and debugging detail for production agent behavior.

Deployment & Data Residency

Deployment modes and options, including SaaS, dedicated cloud, VPC, on-prem, hybrid, local runtime, and self-hosting.

Solution readiness

Prebuilt Agents, Templates & Packs

Ready-made workflows, packaged employees, templates, blueprints, industry solutions, and role-specific agents that reduce time-to-value.

Platform extensibility

Model Flexibility & Routing

Ability to work across multiple foundation models, route tasks to different models, or let buyers bring their own providers and keys.

APIs, SDKs & MCP Extensibility

Composability layer: stable APIs, SDKs, MCP tool consumption/serving, custom tools, and integration into internal systems.

Testing, Debugging & Optimization

Testing, debugging, scoring, retries, fallbacks, quality gates, and optimization loops for improving agent workflows before and after deployment.

Specialist automation

Browser & Computer Use

Browser, desktop, or remote/local computer control for workflows that cannot be handled through stable APIs alone.

Pricing snapshot

Sourced from the Index pricing dataset · open each vendor's profile for full detail.

Pricing
C
Cyware
T
Torq

Entry price

Lowest public entry point

Contact sales. Each engagement gets a custom quote. Contact sales. No rates are published.

Pricing confidence

How public the numbers are

Contact only Contact only

Billing

Primary billing axis

A custom quote built from the suite, the deployment model, analyst seats, intelligence feeds, automation volume and add ons. The billing unit is not published.

Variable cost

Workload / overage exposure

Medium variable cost Medium variable cost

Free tier / trial

Try before you buy

No free tier
No free tier

Buying motion

Self-serve vs sales call

Sales call Sales call

Other matchups in security and SOC agents

Not the pairing you were after? These compare a different set of security and SOC agents on the same 14 capabilities.

See all 79 security and SOC agents comparisons

Contact us

Found a vendor we missed? Have feedback on the index? We'd love to hear from you.