Agentic Index

Swimlane vs Torq (2026)

Swimlane and Torq both come from security automation and both now put AI agents on top of a governed workflow layer. That verdict is the Agentic Index coverage score, graded from each vendor's own published materials.

Torq documents more of the grid, 12.5 of 14 against 10.5. Torq started as security hyperautomation, a successor to SOAR, and added HyperSOC, agentic operations over its workflow fabric; it raised a 140 million dollar Series D in January 2026 at a 1.2 billion dollar valuation and publishes no price. Swimlane's Turbine lets teams drop Hero AI agents into playbooks they build, asks for approval before state changing actions, lets each agent use a different model including the customer's own, and runs in the cloud, on premises or air gapped; it prices by daily actions automated, with AI credits by tier. Both are Full on ten capabilities, among them deployment, oversight, security and model choice. Torq is Full on knowledge grounding and testing and Partial on memory where Swimlane is Partial, None and None. Choose Torq for the most documented platform; choose Swimlane for playbooks you build yourself, priced by daily actions.

On the Agentic Index AI SOC ranking, Swimlane and Torq both clear the bar: each documents all five investigation loop capabilities in full. 23 of the 85 vendors in the lane clear it. See the AI SOC ranking

This comparison is published by Agentic Index, an independent agentic AI vendor research platform. Swimlane and Torq are each graded against the same 14 capability Agentic Index taxonomy, from the vendor's own public materials under the Agentic Index verification standard, alongside 955 researched vendors. No vendor pays for placement and no vendor has reviewed this page. How this evidence is graded

Choose Swimlane if

  • Your team wants to build the playbooks and place agents in them as steps.
  • Each agent should be able to use a different model, including your own.
  • Pricing by daily actions automated fits how you measure automation.

Choose Torq if

  • Grounding and testing must be documented in full; Torq is Full on both and Swimlane is not.
  • You want agentic operations on a proven hyperautomation fabric.
  • A well funded independent vendor matters to your procurement.
Feature
S
Swimlane
T
Torq
Action & orchestration

Integrations & Tool Calling

Ability to connect agents to real systems through native integrations, OAuth-authenticated actions, custom tools, APIs, webhooks, or MCP-compatible tools.

Workflow Orchestration

Ability to sequence, branch, retry, route, and combine deterministic workflow nodes with autonomous agent steps.

Triggers & Channel Coverage

How agents wake up and where they work: schedules, webhooks, message events, CRM events, inbox events, chat, email, voice, and collaboration tools.

Knowledge & context

Knowledge Grounding & RAG

Ability to ground agent behavior in company data through document ingestion, retrieval, external knowledge APIs, semantic search, or RAG layers.

Memory & State Persistence

Ability to persist context across a run, conversation, workflow, user, team, or longer-term memory layer.

Control & trust

Human Oversight & Guardrails

Approval steps, consent checkpoints, escalation rules, structured guardrails, policy constraints, and pause/resume controls.

Security, Identity & Governance

RBAC, SSO, auditability, encryption, least-privilege tool access, compliance posture, and data handling policy.

Observability & Auditability

Traces, logs, execution histories, metrics, audit events, and debugging detail for production agent behavior.

Deployment & Data Residency

Deployment modes and options, including SaaS, dedicated cloud, VPC, on-prem, hybrid, local runtime, and self-hosting.

Solution readiness

Prebuilt Agents, Templates & Packs

Ready-made workflows, packaged employees, templates, blueprints, industry solutions, and role-specific agents that reduce time-to-value.

Platform extensibility

Model Flexibility & Routing

Ability to work across multiple foundation models, route tasks to different models, or let buyers bring their own providers and keys.

APIs, SDKs & MCP Extensibility

Composability layer: stable APIs, SDKs, MCP tool consumption/serving, custom tools, and integration into internal systems.

Testing, Debugging & Optimization

Testing, debugging, scoring, retries, fallbacks, quality gates, and optimization loops for improving agent workflows before and after deployment.

Specialist automation

Browser & Computer Use

Browser, desktop, or remote/local computer control for workflows that cannot be handled through stable APIs alone.

Pricing snapshot

Sourced from the Index pricing dataset · open each vendor's profile for full detail.

Pricing
S
Swimlane
T
Torq

Entry price

Lowest public entry point

Contact sales. No tier prices are published. Contact sales. No rates are published.

Pricing confidence

How public the numbers are

Contact only Contact only

Billing

Primary billing axis

Average daily actions automated, in tiers. Hero AI credits come with each tier, and daily credit packs add more. The billing unit is not published.

Variable cost

Workload / overage exposure

Medium variable cost Medium variable cost

Free tier / trial

Try before you buy

No free tier
No free tier

Buying motion

Self-serve vs sales call

Sales call Sales call

More comparisons with Swimlane or Torq

Other matchups in security and SOC agents

Not the pairing you were after? These compare a different set of security and SOC agents on the same 14 capabilities.

See all 79 security and SOC agents comparisons

Contact us

Found a vendor we missed? Have feedback on the index? We'd love to hear from you.