Agentic Index
Exaforce vs Radiant Security (2026)
Exaforce and Radiant Security have converged on the same insight from different origins: both position against SIEM economics while automating investigation. Radiant pairs agentic triage and investigation with integrated log management and unlimited retention at costs it markets as significantly below traditional SIEM, while Exaforce holds the data layer with multi model reasoning across cloud and SaaS telemetry, netting SIEM storage and licensing savings into its enterprise contracts, with a managed MDR offering available. The bakeoff should be concrete: model three years of your log volumes and alert load through both, and weigh cloud native telemetry depth against triage maturity.
| At a glance | Exaforce | Radiant Security |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Security / SOC agent | Security / SOC agent |
| Entry price | Contact sales; enterprise contracts, positioned to offset SIEM cost | Contact sales; enterprise contracts with optional integrated log management |
| Free / trial | Enterprise evaluations through sales; no self serve trial | Enterprise evaluations through sales; no self serve trial |
| Pricing confidence | contact only | contact only |
| Feature |
E
Exaforce
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Action & orchestration | ||
|
Integrations & Tool Calling Ability to connect agents to real systems through native integrations, OAuth-authenticated actions, custom tools, APIs, webhooks, or MCP-compatible tools. |
Full / Explicit | Full / Explicit |
|
Workflow Orchestration Ability to sequence, branch, retry, route, and combine deterministic workflow nodes with autonomous agent steps. |
Partial | Partial |
|
Triggers & Channel Coverage How agents wake up and where they work: schedules, webhooks, message events, CRM events, inbox events, chat, email, voice, and collaboration tools. |
Full / Explicit | Full / Explicit |
| Knowledge & context | ||
|
Knowledge Grounding & RAG Ability to ground agent behavior in company data through document ingestion, retrieval, external knowledge APIs, semantic search, or RAG layers. |
Full / Explicit | Partial |
|
Memory & State Persistence Ability to persist context across a run, conversation, workflow, user, team, or longer-term memory layer. |
Partial | Partial |
| Control & trust | ||
|
Human Oversight & Guardrails Approval steps, consent checkpoints, escalation rules, structured guardrails, policy constraints, and pause/resume controls. |
Partial | Partial |
|
Security, Identity & Governance RBAC, SSO, auditability, encryption, least-privilege tool access, compliance posture, and data handling policy. |
Full / Explicit | Full / Explicit |
|
Observability & Auditability Traces, logs, execution histories, metrics, audit events, and debugging detail for production agent behavior. |
Full / Explicit | Partial |
|
Deployment & Data Residency Deployment modes and options, including SaaS, dedicated cloud, VPC, on-prem, hybrid, local runtime, and self-hosting. |
Partial | Partial |
| Solution readiness | ||
|
Prebuilt Agents, Templates & Packs Ready-made workflows, packaged employees, templates, blueprints, industry solutions, and role-specific agents that reduce time-to-value. |
Partial | Partial |
| Platform extensibility | ||
|
Model Flexibility & Routing Ability to work across multiple foundation models, route tasks to different models, or let buyers bring their own providers and keys. |
Partial | No / Not documented |
|
APIs, SDKs & MCP Extensibility Composability layer: stable APIs, SDKs, MCP tool consumption/serving, custom tools, and integration into internal systems. |
No / Not documented | No / Not documented |
|
Testing, Debugging & Optimization Testing, debugging, scoring, retries, fallbacks, quality gates, and optimization loops for improving agent workflows before and after deployment. |
No / Not documented | No / Not documented |
| Specialist automation | ||
|
Browser & Computer Use Browser, desktop, or remote/local computer control for workflows that cannot be handled through stable APIs alone. |
No / Not documented | No / Not documented |
Pricing snapshot
Sourced from the Index pricing dataset · open each vendor's profile for full detail.
| Pricing |
E
Exaforce
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
Entry price Lowest public entry point |
Contact sales; enterprise contracts, positioned to offset SIEM cost | Contact sales; enterprise contracts with optional integrated log management |
|
Pricing confidence How public the numbers are |
Contact only | Contact only |
|
Billing Primary billing axis |
enterprise contract | enterprise contract |
|
Variable cost Workload / overage exposure |
Medium variable cost | Low variable cost |
|
Free tier / trial Try before you buy |
No free tierTrial
|
No free tierTrial
|
|
Buying motion Self-serve vs sales call |
Sales call | Sales call |
Choose Exaforce if
- Cloud and SaaS first telemetry matches your environment's center of gravity.
- Multi model investigation reasoning appeals for accuracy on novel threats.
- A managed MDR backstop is worth having in the same contract.
Choose Radiant Security if
- Alert triage maturity and response automation lead your requirements.
- Unlimited retention log management directly displaces budgeted SIEM spend.
- Incident specific executable response plans fit your team's workflow.