Agentic Index

ContraForce vs Qevlar AI (2026)

ContraForce and Qevlar AI both sell heavily to managed security providers, and ContraForce documents more of the grid, 11 of 14 against 8.5. That verdict is the Agentic Index coverage score, graded from each vendor's own published materials.

ContraForce works inside Microsoft Defender XDR and Sentinel, running triage, investigation, response and customer reporting across tenants under each workspace's own procedures, with approval gates on high impact actions and published prices from 249 dollars a month. Qevlar works across more than 50 integrations and reasons in a graph orchestrator rather than a language model, for reproducible tier two and three investigations; it says more than 1,500 organizations run it. On the grid ContraForce is Full on human oversight, knowledge grounding, model choice and workflow orchestration where Qevlar is Partial or None; Qevlar is Partial on memory where ContraForce is None. Choose ContraForce for Microsoft centered delivery with published prices; choose Qevlar for reproducible investigation across mixed stacks.

On the Agentic Index AI SOC ranking, ContraForce clears the bar and Qevlar AI does not. ContraForce documents all five investigation loop capabilities in full; Qevlar AI does not document workflow orchestration in full, nor human oversight and guardrails. 23 of the 85 vendors in the lane clear it. See the AI SOC ranking

This comparison is published by Agentic Index, an independent agentic AI vendor research platform. ContraForce and Qevlar AI are each graded against the same 14 capability Agentic Index taxonomy, from the vendor's own public materials under the Agentic Index verification standard, alongside 955 researched vendors. No vendor pays for placement and no vendor has reviewed this page. How this evidence is graded

Choose ContraForce if

  • Your customers run Defender XDR and Sentinel.
  • High impact actions should pass an approval gate; ContraForce is Full on oversight and Qevlar Partial.
  • Published tier prices help you price your own service.

Choose Qevlar AI if

  • Your customers run a mix of SIEMs and EDRs rather than one Microsoft stack.
  • Reproducible verdicts from a graph orchestrator matter to your auditors.
  • Memory across investigations should be documented; Qevlar is Partial and ContraForce None.
Feature
C
ContraForce
Q
Qevlar AI
Action & orchestration

Integrations & Tool Calling

Ability to connect agents to real systems through native integrations, OAuth-authenticated actions, custom tools, APIs, webhooks, or MCP-compatible tools.

Workflow Orchestration

Ability to sequence, branch, retry, route, and combine deterministic workflow nodes with autonomous agent steps.

Triggers & Channel Coverage

How agents wake up and where they work: schedules, webhooks, message events, CRM events, inbox events, chat, email, voice, and collaboration tools.

Knowledge & context

Knowledge Grounding & RAG

Ability to ground agent behavior in company data through document ingestion, retrieval, external knowledge APIs, semantic search, or RAG layers.

Memory & State Persistence

Ability to persist context across a run, conversation, workflow, user, team, or longer-term memory layer.

Control & trust

Human Oversight & Guardrails

Approval steps, consent checkpoints, escalation rules, structured guardrails, policy constraints, and pause/resume controls.

Security, Identity & Governance

RBAC, SSO, auditability, encryption, least-privilege tool access, compliance posture, and data handling policy.

Observability & Auditability

Traces, logs, execution histories, metrics, audit events, and debugging detail for production agent behavior.

Deployment & Data Residency

Deployment modes and options, including SaaS, dedicated cloud, VPC, on-prem, hybrid, local runtime, and self-hosting.

Solution readiness

Prebuilt Agents, Templates & Packs

Ready-made workflows, packaged employees, templates, blueprints, industry solutions, and role-specific agents that reduce time-to-value.

Platform extensibility

Model Flexibility & Routing

Ability to work across multiple foundation models, route tasks to different models, or let buyers bring their own providers and keys.

APIs, SDKs & MCP Extensibility

Composability layer: stable APIs, SDKs, MCP tool consumption/serving, custom tools, and integration into internal systems.

Testing, Debugging & Optimization

Testing, debugging, scoring, retries, fallbacks, quality gates, and optimization loops for improving agent workflows before and after deployment.

Specialist automation

Browser & Computer Use

Browser, desktop, or remote/local computer control for workflows that cannot be handled through stable APIs alone.

Pricing snapshot

Sourced from the Index pricing dataset · open each vendor's profile for full detail.

Pricing
C
ContraForce
Q
Qevlar AI

Entry price

Lowest public entry point

Starter from $249 per month (4 client workspaces), plus a flat rate per incident for each agent run, quoted by ContraForce. Contact sales; enterprise and MSSP contracts, no public rates

Pricing confidence

How public the numbers are

Public, partial Contact only

Billing

Primary billing axis

Monthly tier by client workspace allowance, plus a flat rate per Security Delivery Agent run. enterprise contract (MSSP packaging)

Variable cost

Workload / overage exposure

Medium variable cost Low variable cost

Free tier / trial

Try before you buy

No free tierTrial
No free tierTrial

Buying motion

Self-serve vs sales call

Mixed Sales call

Contact us

Found a vendor we missed? Have feedback on the index? We'd love to hear from you.