Agentic Index
Exaforce vs Prophet Security (2026)
Exaforce and Prophet Security both sell autonomous SOC platforms through enterprise sales, differentiated by architectural ambition: Prophet is vendor agnostic orchestration over your existing SIEM, EDR, identity, and cloud tools, with top ranked investigation autonomy, explainable reasoning, and threat hunting included, while Exaforce holds the data layer itself, running multi model reasoning across cloud and SaaS telemetry and positioning its cost as a counterweight to SIEM storage and licensing, with managed MDR available. Keep your stack and add the best investigator, that is Prophet; consolidate the data layer while adding agents, that is Exaforce.
| At a glance | Exaforce | Prophet Security |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Security / SOC agent | Security / SOC agent |
| Entry price | Contact sales; enterprise contracts, positioned to offset SIEM cost | Contact sales; enterprise contracts, no public rates |
| Free / trial | Enterprise evaluations through sales; no self serve trial | Proof of value evaluations through sales; no self serve trial |
| Pricing confidence | contact only | contact only |
| Feature |
E
Exaforce
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Action & orchestration | ||
|
Integrations & Tool Calling Ability to connect agents to real systems through native integrations, OAuth-authenticated actions, custom tools, APIs, webhooks, or MCP-compatible tools. |
Full / Explicit | Full / Explicit |
|
Workflow Orchestration Ability to sequence, branch, retry, route, and combine deterministic workflow nodes with autonomous agent steps. |
Partial | Partial |
|
Triggers & Channel Coverage How agents wake up and where they work: schedules, webhooks, message events, CRM events, inbox events, chat, email, voice, and collaboration tools. |
Full / Explicit | Full / Explicit |
| Knowledge & context | ||
|
Knowledge Grounding & RAG Ability to ground agent behavior in company data through document ingestion, retrieval, external knowledge APIs, semantic search, or RAG layers. |
Full / Explicit | Partial |
|
Memory & State Persistence Ability to persist context across a run, conversation, workflow, user, team, or longer-term memory layer. |
Partial | Full / Explicit |
| Control & trust | ||
|
Human Oversight & Guardrails Approval steps, consent checkpoints, escalation rules, structured guardrails, policy constraints, and pause/resume controls. |
Partial | Full / Explicit |
|
Security, Identity & Governance RBAC, SSO, auditability, encryption, least-privilege tool access, compliance posture, and data handling policy. |
Full / Explicit | Full / Explicit |
|
Observability & Auditability Traces, logs, execution histories, metrics, audit events, and debugging detail for production agent behavior. |
Full / Explicit | Full / Explicit |
|
Deployment & Data Residency Deployment modes and options, including SaaS, dedicated cloud, VPC, on-prem, hybrid, local runtime, and self-hosting. |
Partial | Full / Explicit |
| Solution readiness | ||
|
Prebuilt Agents, Templates & Packs Ready-made workflows, packaged employees, templates, blueprints, industry solutions, and role-specific agents that reduce time-to-value. |
Partial | Partial |
| Platform extensibility | ||
|
Model Flexibility & Routing Ability to work across multiple foundation models, route tasks to different models, or let buyers bring their own providers and keys. |
Partial | No / Not documented |
|
APIs, SDKs & MCP Extensibility Composability layer: stable APIs, SDKs, MCP tool consumption/serving, custom tools, and integration into internal systems. |
No / Not documented | No / Not documented |
|
Testing, Debugging & Optimization Testing, debugging, scoring, retries, fallbacks, quality gates, and optimization loops for improving agent workflows before and after deployment. |
No / Not documented | No / Not documented |
| Specialist automation | ||
|
Browser & Computer Use Browser, desktop, or remote/local computer control for workflows that cannot be handled through stable APIs alone. |
No / Not documented | No / Not documented |
Pricing snapshot
Sourced from the Index pricing dataset · open each vendor's profile for full detail.
| Pricing |
E
Exaforce
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
Entry price Lowest public entry point |
Contact sales; enterprise contracts, positioned to offset SIEM cost | Contact sales; enterprise contracts, no public rates |
|
Pricing confidence How public the numbers are |
Contact only | Contact only |
|
Billing Primary billing axis |
enterprise contract | enterprise contract |
|
Variable cost Workload / overage exposure |
Medium variable cost | Low variable cost |
|
Free tier / trial Try before you buy |
No free tierTrial
|
No free tierTrial
|
|
Buying motion Self-serve vs sales call |
Sales call | Sales call |
Choose Exaforce if
- Owning the data layer and cutting SIEM spend is part of the mandate.
- Cloud and SaaS native telemetry is where your environment lives.
- A managed detection and response option matters for coverage gaps.
Choose Prophet Security if
- Your existing security stack stays; you want the strongest investigation layer on top.
- Explainable, evidence backed reasoning is what earns analyst trust.
- VPC deployment and included threat hunting round out the requirement list.