Agentic Index
Noma Security vs Zenity (2026)
The two leading agent security platforms, and the split is coverage philosophy. That verdict is the Agentic Index coverage score, graded from each vendor's own published materials.
Zenity was purpose built for the enterprise copilot and agent platforms, covering Copilot Studio, Agentforce, Bedrock, Azure AI Foundry, Vertex AI and ChatGPT Enterprise with intent aware runtime enforcement, and Gartner has called it the company to beat in agent governance. Noma is the leading independent counterpart, covering homegrown, SaaS and developer machine agents with AI-SPM, tool level Agent Access Control including MCP servers, runtime detection across prompts, tool calls and agent to agent traffic, plus continuous red teaming. Platform agents against agents wherever they are.
On the Agentic Index AI SOC ranking, neither Noma Security nor Zenity clears the bar, which asks for all five investigation loop capabilities documented in full. Neither documents human oversight and guardrails in full. 24 of the 94 vendors in the lane clear it. See the AI SOC ranking
This comparison is published by Agentic Index, an independent agentic AI vendor research platform. Noma Security and Zenity are each graded against the same 14 capability Agentic Index taxonomy, from the vendor's own public materials under the Agentic Index verification standard, alongside 969 researched vendors. No vendor pays for placement and no vendor has reviewed this page. How this evidence is graded
Choose Noma Security if
- Your agents are homegrown or spread across tools no platform vendor covers.
- MCP server governance and agent to agent traffic are in scope today, not next year.
- Continuous red teaming built into the same platform matters to you.
Choose Zenity if
- Your agent estate is Copilot Studio, Agentforce and the major cloud AI platforms.
- Intent aware runtime enforcement on those platforms is the specific control you need.
- Analyst positioning carries weight in your buying process.
| At a glance | Noma Security | Zenity |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Security / SOC agent | Security / SOC agent |
| Entry price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Free / trial | Not published | Not published |
| Pricing confidence | contact only | contact only |
| Feature | N Noma Security |
Z Zenity |
|---|---|---|
| Action & orchestration | ||
|
Integrations & Tool Calling Ability to connect agents to real systems through native integrations, OAuth-authenticated actions, custom tools, APIs, webhooks, or MCP-compatible tools. |
Full / Explicit | Full / Explicit |
|
Workflow Orchestration Ability to sequence, branch, retry, route, and combine deterministic workflow nodes with autonomous agent steps. |
Full / Explicit | Full / Explicit |
|
Triggers & Channel Coverage How agents wake up and where they work: schedules, webhooks, message events, CRM events, inbox events, chat, email, voice, and collaboration tools. |
Full / Explicit | Full / Explicit |
| Knowledge & context | ||
|
Knowledge Grounding & RAG Ability to ground agent behavior in company data through document ingestion, retrieval, external knowledge APIs, semantic search, or RAG layers. |
Partial | Partial |
|
Memory & State Persistence Ability to persist context across a run, conversation, workflow, user, team, or longer-term memory layer. |
Partial | Partial |
| Control & trust | ||
|
Human Oversight & Guardrails Approval steps, consent checkpoints, escalation rules, structured guardrails, policy constraints, and pause/resume controls. |
Partial | Partial |
|
Security, Identity & Governance RBAC, SSO, auditability, encryption, least-privilege tool access, compliance posture, and data handling policy. |
Full / Explicit | Full / Explicit |
|
Observability & Auditability Traces, logs, execution histories, metrics, audit events, and debugging detail for production agent behavior. |
Full / Explicit | Full / Explicit |
|
Deployment & Data Residency Deployment modes and options, including SaaS, dedicated cloud, VPC, on-prem, hybrid, local runtime, and self-hosting. |
Partial | Partial |
| Solution readiness | ||
|
Prebuilt Agents, Templates & Packs Ready-made workflows, packaged employees, templates, blueprints, industry solutions, and role-specific agents that reduce time-to-value. |
Partial | Partial |
| Platform extensibility | ||
|
Model Flexibility & Routing Ability to work across multiple foundation models, route tasks to different models, or let buyers bring their own providers and keys. |
No / Not documented | No / Not documented |
|
APIs, SDKs & MCP Extensibility Composability layer: stable APIs, SDKs, MCP tool consumption/serving, custom tools, and integration into internal systems. |
Partial | Partial |
|
Testing, Debugging & Optimization Testing, debugging, scoring, retries, fallbacks, quality gates, and optimization loops for improving agent workflows before and after deployment. |
Partial | No / Not documented |
| Specialist automation | ||
|
Browser & Computer Use Browser, desktop, or remote/local computer control for workflows that cannot be handled through stable APIs alone. |
No / Not documented | No / Not documented |
Pricing snapshot
Sourced from the Index pricing dataset · open each vendor's profile for full detail.
| Pricing | N Noma Security |
Z Zenity |
|---|---|---|
|
Entry price Lowest public entry point |
Contact sales | Contact sales |
|
Pricing confidence How public the numbers are |
Contact only | Contact only |
|
Billing Primary billing axis |
number of agents secured, MCP servers, integrations, deployment scope | enterprise contract |
|
Variable cost Workload / overage exposure |
Medium variable cost | Medium variable cost |
|
Free tier / trial Try before you buy |
No free tier
|
No free tier
|
|
Buying motion Self-serve vs sales call |
Sales call | Sales call |
More comparisons with Noma Security or Zenity
Other matchups in security and SOC agents
Not the pairing you were after? These compare a different set of security and SOC agents on the same 14 capabilities.