Agentic Index

Noma Security vs Zenity (2026)

Both vendors last verified

Noma Security and Zenity both govern the AI agents an enterprise builds, buys and runs. That verdict is the Agentic Index coverage score, graded from each vendor's own published materials.

Noma discovers agents, MCP servers and skills into a registry where each is approved, flagged for review or blocked, controls which agents can use which tools at runtime, logs and blocks agent traffic, and red teams agents continuously, and it sells through a demo. Zenity inventories agents across SaaS, cloud, endpoint and coding tools, checks posture before go live and enforces runtime Boundaries, with an Evaluate API. Zenity carries ISO 27001 and a SOC 2 Type II report and sells Observability on AWS Marketplace at $130 per resource a month. Noma red teams continuously and moves each agent through its registry, while Zenity checks posture before go live and runs Blue Agent triage under a person's approval. Choose Noma for an approval registry with continuous red teaming. Choose Zenity for governance with an API for inline decisions.

On the Agentic Index AI SOC ranking, neither Noma Security nor Zenity clears the bar, which asks for all five investigation loop capabilities documented in full. Noma Security does not document human oversight and guardrails in full; Zenity does not document workflow orchestration in full. 25 of the 86 vendors in the lane clear it. See the AI SOC ranking

On the Agentic Index agent infrastructure ranking, neither Noma Security nor Zenity clears the bar, which asks for all five production contract capabilities documented in full. Each documents two of the five in full. 33 of the 186 vendors in the lane clear it. See the agent infrastructure ranking

This comparison is published by Agentic Index, an independent agentic AI vendor research platform. Noma Security and Zenity are each graded against the same 14 capability Agentic Index taxonomy, from the vendor's own public materials under the Agentic Index verification standard, alongside 1,084 researched vendors. No vendor pays for placement and no vendor has reviewed this page. How this evidence is graded

Choose Noma Security if

  • Every agent, MCP server and skill should pass an approval registry.
  • Agents should be red teamed continuously, not only before release.
  • Tool access should depend on who the agent acts for.

Choose Zenity if

  • Custom agents should request an enforcement decision from an API before they act.
  • Human approval should sit on finding triage.
  • Certifications and a public price matter to procurement.
Feature
N
Noma Security
Z
Zenity
Action & orchestration

Integrations & Tool Calling

Ability to connect agents to real systems through native integrations, OAuth-authenticated actions, custom tools, APIs, webhooks, or MCP-compatible tools.

Workflow Orchestration

Ability to sequence, branch, retry, route, and combine deterministic workflow nodes with autonomous agent steps.

Triggers & Channel Coverage

How agents wake up and where they work: schedules, webhooks, message events, CRM events, inbox events, chat, email, voice, and collaboration tools.

Knowledge & context

Knowledge Grounding & RAG

Ability to ground agent behavior in company data through document ingestion, retrieval, external knowledge APIs, semantic search, or RAG layers.

Memory & State Persistence

Ability to persist context across a run, conversation, workflow, user, team, or longer-term memory layer.

Control & trust

Human Oversight & Guardrails

Approval steps, consent checkpoints, escalation rules, structured guardrails, policy constraints, and pause/resume controls.

Security, Identity & Governance

RBAC, SSO, auditability, encryption, least-privilege tool access, compliance posture, and data handling policy.

Observability & Auditability

Traces, logs, execution histories, metrics, audit events, and debugging detail for production agent behavior.

Deployment & Data Residency

Deployment modes and options, including SaaS, dedicated cloud, VPC, on-prem, hybrid, local runtime, and self-hosting.

Solution readiness

Prebuilt Agents, Templates & Packs

Ready-made workflows, packaged employees, templates, blueprints, industry solutions, and role-specific agents that reduce time-to-value.

Platform extensibility

Model Flexibility & Routing

Ability to work across multiple foundation models, route tasks to different models, or let buyers bring their own providers and keys.

APIs, SDKs & MCP Extensibility

Composability layer: stable APIs, SDKs, MCP tool consumption/serving, custom tools, and integration into internal systems.

Testing, Debugging & Optimization

Testing, debugging, scoring, retries, fallbacks, quality gates, and optimization loops for improving agent workflows before and after deployment.

Specialist automation

Browser & Computer Use

Browser, desktop, or remote/local computer control for workflows that cannot be handled through stable APIs alone.

Pricing snapshot

Sourced from the Index pricing dataset · open each vendor's profile for full detail.

Pricing
N
Noma Security
Z
Zenity

Entry price

Lowest public entry point

Contact sales; no prices published. Demo on request. AWS Marketplace (Security Hub Extended): Observability at $130 per resource per month, plus Runtime Protection at $16 and Guardrails for AWS at $2 per million tokens per month.

Pricing confidence

How public the numbers are

Contact only Public, partial

Billing

Primary billing axis

Inference, not stated by the vendor: agents secured, MCP servers covered, integrations and deployment scope. Per monitored resource per month for observability, plus per million tokens for runtime protection and guardrails (AWS Security Hub Extended); private-offer contracts otherwise.

Variable cost

Workload / overage exposure

Medium variable cost High variable cost

Free tier / trial

Try before you buy

No free tier
No free tierTrial

Buying motion

Self-serve vs sales call

Sales call Mixed

Pricing verified

When this pricing was last checked

Product updates

Newest first, each linked to its source.

Noma Security

  • · Integrations

    Noma connected its AI-DR runtime product to NVIDIA OpenShell through the supervisor middleware, so each request an agent makes inside an OpenShell sandbox, including prompts, tool calls and MCP traffic, passes to Noma for inspection after OpenShell's own policy check.

    Source
  • · Security / enterprise

    Noma now finds and governs the AI agents employees run on their laptops, using the EDR or MDM a company already has to discover coding and productivity agents, MCP servers, skills and connected accounts.

    Source
  • · Integrations

    Noma Security is available through the AWS Security Hub Extended console as its AI security partner, so enterprises can turn on AI security monitoring from within AWS.

    Source

Zenity

  • · Human approval / guardrails

    Zenity now supports tool call validation in Anthropic's Inference Hooks for Claude Enterprise, so each tool call Claude proposes is held for an allow or deny verdict from Zenity before it runs.

    Source
  • · Integrations

    Zenity announced an integration with AWS Security Hub to secure enterprise AI agents.

    Source
  • · Integrations

    Zenity extended its AI agent security and governance platform to support Claude Enterprise.

    Source

Other matchups in security and SOC agents

Not the pairing you were after? These compare a different set of security and SOC agents on the same 14 capabilities.

See all 79 security and SOC agents comparisons

Contact us

Found a vendor we missed? Have feedback on the index? We'd love to hear from you.