Agentic Index
Mindgard vs Repello (2026)
Both score 9 of 14 and both run continuous AI red teaming with runtime protection, which makes this one of the closest comparisons in the lane.
Mindgard is research led, a Lancaster University spinout with eleven PhDs, mapping the production attack surface then running MITRE ATLAS and OWASP mapped attacks, deployed through GitHub Actions, CLI and Burp Suite. Repello runs a three phase loop, discover and build an AI BOM, red team with ARTEMIS across 15 million attack patterns and 270 plus vulnerability types, then deploy guardrails calibrated from those results, with multi modal and multi lingual coverage. Decide on the loop: Mindgard tests deeply, Repello closes the circle into guardrails.
Choose Mindgard if
- Research pedigree matters to how you evaluate security claims.
- Existing developer tooling integration, especially Burp Suite, is how your team works.
- Testing depth is the requirement and guardrails are already handled elsewhere.
Choose Repello if
- You want red team results automatically calibrating the guardrails, not a report to act on.
- Multi modal and multi lingual attack coverage matches how your systems are used.
- An AI BOM as the discovery step fits an environment where nobody knows what is deployed.
Vendor data for this comparison is unavailable.
Browse the full vendor directory