Agentic Index

Mindgard vs Repello AI (2026)

Both vendors last verified

Mindgard and Repello AI both run autonomous red teaming against the customer's AI apps and agents, both offer an API, and they differ on what surrounds the testing. That verdict is the Agentic Index coverage score, graded from each vendor's own published materials.

Mindgard emulates an adversary's workflow from reconnaissance through multi step attacks, continuously or in CI/CD, and offers expert red teaming services beside the platform. Repello adds more around the testing. ARTEMIS maps findings to MITRE, OWASP, NIST, ISO 42001 and the EU AI Act, ARGUS guardrails log every call at runtime, Workstation Lens finds agents on endpoints, and free open source tools include a GitHub Action. Neither has a public price. Choose Mindgard for adversary style testing with human experts. Choose Repello for testing, runtime logging and endpoint discovery in one suite.

On the Agentic Index AI SOC ranking, neither Mindgard nor Repello AI clears the bar, which asks for all five investigation loop capabilities documented in full. Mindgard documents two of the five in full; Repello AI does not document human oversight and guardrails in full. 25 of the 86 vendors in the lane clear it. See the AI SOC ranking

On the Agentic Index agent infrastructure ranking, neither Mindgard nor Repello AI clears the bar, which asks for all five production contract capabilities documented in full. Each documents two of the five in full. 33 of the 186 vendors in the lane clear it. See the agent infrastructure ranking

This comparison is published by Agentic Index, an independent agentic AI vendor research platform. Mindgard and Repello AI are each graded against the same 14 capability Agentic Index taxonomy, from the vendor's own public materials under the Agentic Index verification standard, alongside 1,084 researched vendors. No vendor pays for placement and no vendor has reviewed this page. How this evidence is graded

Choose Mindgard if

  • Red teaming that follows an attacker's workflow is the main need.
  • Human experts should be available beside the platform.
  • Shadow AI discovery during reconnaissance matters.

Choose Repello AI if

  • Every runtime call should be logged.
  • Findings should map to the major AI risk frameworks.
  • Free open source tools help you start.
Feature
M
Mindgard
R
Repello AI
Action & orchestration

Integrations & Tool Calling

Ability to connect agents to real systems through native integrations, OAuth-authenticated actions, custom tools, APIs, webhooks, or MCP-compatible tools.

Workflow Orchestration

Ability to sequence, branch, retry, route, and combine deterministic workflow nodes with autonomous agent steps.

Triggers & Channel Coverage

How agents wake up and where they work: schedules, webhooks, message events, CRM events, inbox events, chat, email, voice, and collaboration tools.

Knowledge & context

Knowledge Grounding & RAG

Ability to ground agent behavior in company data through document ingestion, retrieval, external knowledge APIs, semantic search, or RAG layers.

Memory & State Persistence

Ability to persist context across a run, conversation, workflow, user, team, or longer-term memory layer.

Control & trust

Human Oversight & Guardrails

Approval steps, consent checkpoints, escalation rules, structured guardrails, policy constraints, and pause/resume controls.

Security, Identity & Governance

RBAC, SSO, auditability, encryption, least-privilege tool access, compliance posture, and data handling policy.

Observability & Auditability

Traces, logs, execution histories, metrics, audit events, and debugging detail for production agent behavior.

Deployment & Data Residency

Deployment modes and options, including SaaS, dedicated cloud, VPC, on-prem, hybrid, local runtime, and self-hosting.

Solution readiness

Prebuilt Agents, Templates & Packs

Ready-made workflows, packaged employees, templates, blueprints, industry solutions, and role-specific agents that reduce time-to-value.

Platform extensibility

Model Flexibility & Routing

Ability to work across multiple foundation models, route tasks to different models, or let buyers bring their own providers and keys.

APIs, SDKs & MCP Extensibility

Composability layer: stable APIs, SDKs, MCP tool consumption/serving, custom tools, and integration into internal systems.

Testing, Debugging & Optimization

Testing, debugging, scoring, retries, fallbacks, quality gates, and optimization loops for improving agent workflows before and after deployment.

Specialist automation

Browser & Computer Use

Browser, desktop, or remote/local computer control for workflows that cannot be handled through stable APIs alone.

Pricing snapshot

Sourced from the Index pricing dataset · open each vendor's profile for full detail.

Pricing
M
Mindgard
R
Repello AI

Entry price

Lowest public entry point

Contact sales; no prices published. Demo on request. Contact sales; no prices published. Open-source tools are free.

Pricing confidence

How public the numbers are

Contact only Contact only

Billing

Primary billing axis

Inference, not stated by the vendor: AI systems under continuous testing plus any expert services. Inference, not stated by the vendor: AI systems under red teaming and runtime protection, and endpoints covered.

Variable cost

Workload / overage exposure

Medium variable cost Medium variable cost

Free tier / trial

Try before you buy

No free tier
No free tier

Buying motion

Self-serve vs sales call

Sales call Sales call

Pricing verified

When this pricing was last checked

Other matchups in security and SOC agents

Not the pairing you were after? These compare a different set of security and SOC agents on the same 14 capabilities.

See all 79 security and SOC agents comparisons

Contact us

Found a vendor we missed? Have feedback on the index? We'd love to hear from you.