Agentic Index
Astelia vs Dux (2026)
Two exposure management platforms scoring 7 of 14 each, both founded by elite Israeli cyber alumni, both quoted through sales, both solving the same problem: your scanner found millions of vulnerabilities and almost none of them matter.
Astelia maps the real network and uses agents to analyze exploitability and reachability, narrowing to roughly the two percent that represent true exposure, with attack path visualization. Dux analyzes what is actually exploitable, then checks whether existing controls already block the path and surfaces lightweight mitigations faster than full patches. Astelia proves the path exists; Dux tells you whether you already stopped it.
Choose Astelia if
- Attack path visualization is what will move your remediation conversation forward.
- Reachability analysis across the real network is the reduction you need.
- You want the exposure narrowed hard before anything reaches an asset owner.
Choose Dux if
- Your existing controls may already block much of this and nobody has checked.
- Mitigations you can apply today beat patches queued behind a maintenance window.
- Routing targeted remediation to asset owners is the workflow that actually stalls for you.
Vendor data for this comparison is unavailable.
Browse the full vendor directory