Agentic Index
Noma Security vs Straiker (2026)
Both score 8.5 of 14 covering discovery, testing and runtime defense for agents, and they weight those differently.
Noma runs posture management, Agent Access Control governing agents and MCP servers at tool level, and runtime detection across prompts, tool calls, MCP and agent to agent traffic. Straiker runs three modules: inventory with shadow usage detection, continuous adversarial testing on every deployment mapped to OWASP, MITRE ATLAS and the EU AI Act, and sub second runtime blocking, with customers including Comcast, Fortinet, Snowflake and Deloitte. Noma is stronger on governing what agents may reach; Straiker is stronger on testing them and proving it to a regulator.
Choose Noma Security if
- Tool level access control over agents and MCP servers is the governance gap you have.
- Agent to agent traffic is part of your architecture and needs watching.
- Posture management across your AI estate is the practice you are establishing.
Choose Straiker if
- Regulatory mapping to OWASP, MITRE ATLAS and the EU AI Act is how your reporting must read.
- Testing on every deployment rather than periodically matches your release cadence.
- Named enterprise customers at that scale lower the risk of the decision.
| At a glance | Noma Security | Straiker |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Security / SOC agent | Security / SOC agent |
| Entry price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Free / trial | Not published | Not published |
| Pricing confidence | contact only | contact only |
| Feature | N Noma Security |
S Straiker |
|---|---|---|
| Action & orchestration | ||
|
Integrations & Tool Calling Ability to connect agents to real systems through native integrations, OAuth-authenticated actions, custom tools, APIs, webhooks, or MCP-compatible tools. |
Full / Explicit | Full / Explicit |
|
Workflow Orchestration Ability to sequence, branch, retry, route, and combine deterministic workflow nodes with autonomous agent steps. |
Full / Explicit | Full / Explicit |
|
Triggers & Channel Coverage How agents wake up and where they work: schedules, webhooks, message events, CRM events, inbox events, chat, email, voice, and collaboration tools. |
Full / Explicit | Full / Explicit |
| Knowledge & context | ||
|
Knowledge Grounding & RAG Ability to ground agent behavior in company data through document ingestion, retrieval, external knowledge APIs, semantic search, or RAG layers. |
Partial | Partial |
|
Memory & State Persistence Ability to persist context across a run, conversation, workflow, user, team, or longer-term memory layer. |
Partial | Partial |
| Control & trust | ||
|
Human Oversight & Guardrails Approval steps, consent checkpoints, escalation rules, structured guardrails, policy constraints, and pause/resume controls. |
Partial | Partial |
|
Security, Identity & Governance RBAC, SSO, auditability, encryption, least-privilege tool access, compliance posture, and data handling policy. |
Full / Explicit | Full / Explicit |
|
Observability & Auditability Traces, logs, execution histories, metrics, audit events, and debugging detail for production agent behavior. |
Full / Explicit | Full / Explicit |
|
Deployment & Data Residency Deployment modes and options, including SaaS, dedicated cloud, VPC, on-prem, hybrid, local runtime, and self-hosting. |
Partial | Partial |
| Solution readiness | ||
|
Prebuilt Agents, Templates & Packs Ready-made workflows, packaged employees, templates, blueprints, industry solutions, and role-specific agents that reduce time-to-value. |
Partial | Partial |
| Platform extensibility | ||
|
Model Flexibility & Routing Ability to work across multiple foundation models, route tasks to different models, or let buyers bring their own providers and keys. |
No / Not documented | No / Not documented |
|
APIs, SDKs & MCP Extensibility Composability layer: stable APIs, SDKs, MCP tool consumption/serving, custom tools, and integration into internal systems. |
Partial | Partial |
|
Testing, Debugging & Optimization Testing, debugging, scoring, retries, fallbacks, quality gates, and optimization loops for improving agent workflows before and after deployment. |
Partial | Partial |
| Specialist automation | ||
|
Browser & Computer Use Browser, desktop, or remote/local computer control for workflows that cannot be handled through stable APIs alone. |
No / Not documented | No / Not documented |
Pricing snapshot
Sourced from the Index pricing dataset · open each vendor's profile for full detail.
| Pricing | N Noma Security |
S Straiker |
|---|---|---|
|
Entry price Lowest public entry point |
Contact sales | Contact sales |
|
Pricing confidence How public the numbers are |
Contact only | Contact only |
|
Billing Primary billing axis |
number of agents secured, MCP servers, integrations, deployment scope | scope of agents, applications, and MCP servers secured across testing and runtime protection |
|
Variable cost Workload / overage exposure |
Medium variable cost | Medium variable cost |
|
Free tier / trial Try before you buy |
No free tier
|
No free tier
|
|
Buying motion Self-serve vs sales call |
Sales call | Sales call |