Agentic Index
Lasso Security vs Pillar Security (2026)
Both cover the full AI security lifecycle and they weight offense differently, at 8.5 and 9 of 14. That verdict is the Agentic Index coverage score, graded from each vendor's own published materials.
Lasso works five pillars of discover, assess, test, enforce and protect with a three thousand plus attack library, an Intent Security framework for behavioural baselines and sub fifty millisecond classification at a published 98.6 percent accuracy. Pillar catalogs models, tools, MCP servers and coding agents with red teaming as a first class pillar built on offensive agents. Lasso publishes numbers you can hold it to; Pillar covers coding agents, which is where exposure is growing fastest.
On the Agentic Index AI SOC ranking, neither Lasso Security nor Pillar Security clears the bar, which asks for all five investigation loop capabilities documented in full. Neither documents human oversight and guardrails in full. 24 of the 94 vendors in the lane clear it. See the AI SOC ranking
This comparison is published by Agentic Index, an independent agentic AI vendor research platform. Lasso Security and Pillar Security are each graded against the same 14 capability Agentic Index taxonomy, from the vendor's own public materials under the Agentic Index verification standard, alongside 969 researched vendors. No vendor pays for placement and no vendor has reviewed this page. How this evidence is graded
Choose Lasso Security if
- A published classification accuracy figure is the evidence standard you evaluate on.
- Behavioural intent baselines are the control model you find credible for agents.
- Inline enforcement at proxy, API or gateway matches where you can intervene.
Choose Pillar Security if
- Documented coverage is slightly broader and coding agents belong in your inventory.
- Red teaming as a first class pillar rather than a test suite is the posture you want.
- MCP servers and tools catalogued alongside models is the completeness you need.
| At a glance | Lasso Security | Pillar Security |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Security / SOC agent | Security / SOC agent |
| Entry price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Free / trial | Not published | Not published |
| Pricing confidence | contact only | contact only |
| Feature | L Lasso Security |
P Pillar Security |
|---|---|---|
| Action & orchestration | ||
|
Integrations & Tool Calling Ability to connect agents to real systems through native integrations, OAuth-authenticated actions, custom tools, APIs, webhooks, or MCP-compatible tools. |
Full / Explicit | Full / Explicit |
|
Workflow Orchestration Ability to sequence, branch, retry, route, and combine deterministic workflow nodes with autonomous agent steps. |
Full / Explicit | Full / Explicit |
|
Triggers & Channel Coverage How agents wake up and where they work: schedules, webhooks, message events, CRM events, inbox events, chat, email, voice, and collaboration tools. |
Full / Explicit | Full / Explicit |
| Knowledge & context | ||
|
Knowledge Grounding & RAG Ability to ground agent behavior in company data through document ingestion, retrieval, external knowledge APIs, semantic search, or RAG layers. |
Partial | Partial |
|
Memory & State Persistence Ability to persist context across a run, conversation, workflow, user, team, or longer-term memory layer. |
Partial | Partial |
| Control & trust | ||
|
Human Oversight & Guardrails Approval steps, consent checkpoints, escalation rules, structured guardrails, policy constraints, and pause/resume controls. |
Partial | Partial |
|
Security, Identity & Governance RBAC, SSO, auditability, encryption, least-privilege tool access, compliance posture, and data handling policy. |
Full / Explicit | Full / Explicit |
|
Observability & Auditability Traces, logs, execution histories, metrics, audit events, and debugging detail for production agent behavior. |
Full / Explicit | Full / Explicit |
|
Deployment & Data Residency Deployment modes and options, including SaaS, dedicated cloud, VPC, on-prem, hybrid, local runtime, and self-hosting. |
Partial | Partial |
| Solution readiness | ||
|
Prebuilt Agents, Templates & Packs Ready-made workflows, packaged employees, templates, blueprints, industry solutions, and role-specific agents that reduce time-to-value. |
Partial | Partial |
| Platform extensibility | ||
|
Model Flexibility & Routing Ability to work across multiple foundation models, route tasks to different models, or let buyers bring their own providers and keys. |
No / Not documented | No / Not documented |
|
APIs, SDKs & MCP Extensibility Composability layer: stable APIs, SDKs, MCP tool consumption/serving, custom tools, and integration into internal systems. |
Partial | Partial |
|
Testing, Debugging & Optimization Testing, debugging, scoring, retries, fallbacks, quality gates, and optimization loops for improving agent workflows before and after deployment. |
Partial | Full / Explicit |
| Specialist automation | ||
|
Browser & Computer Use Browser, desktop, or remote/local computer control for workflows that cannot be handled through stable APIs alone. |
No / Not documented | No / Not documented |
Pricing snapshot
Sourced from the Index pricing dataset · open each vendor's profile for full detail.
| Pricing | L Lasso Security |
P Pillar Security |
|---|---|---|
|
Entry price Lowest public entry point |
Contact sales | Contact sales |
|
Pricing confidence How public the numbers are |
Contact only | Contact only |
|
Billing Primary billing axis |
scope of models, agents, and applications secured across discovery, testing, and runtime protection | scope of AI assets, agents, and applications secured across the AI lifecycle |
|
Variable cost Workload / overage exposure |
Medium variable cost | Medium variable cost |
|
Free tier / trial Try before you buy |
No free tier
|
No free tier
|
|
Buying motion Self-serve vs sales call |
Sales call | Sales call |
Lasso's 98.6 percent accuracy and sub fifty millisecond latency figures are vendor published and not independently validated. Ask them to reproduce both against your own traffic during evaluation.
More comparisons with Lasso Security or Pillar Security
Other matchups in security and SOC agents
Not the pairing you were after? These compare a different set of security and SOC agents on the same 14 capabilities.