Agentic Index
Lasso Security vs Pillar Security (2026)
Both cover the full AI security lifecycle and they weight offense differently, at 8.5 and 9 of 14.
Lasso works five pillars of discover, assess, test, enforce and protect with a three thousand plus attack library, an Intent Security framework for behavioural baselines and sub fifty millisecond classification at a published 98.6 percent accuracy. Pillar catalogs models, tools, MCP servers and coding agents with red teaming as a first class pillar built on offensive agents. Lasso publishes numbers you can hold it to; Pillar covers coding agents, which is where exposure is growing fastest.
Choose Lasso Security if
- A published classification accuracy figure is the evidence standard you evaluate on.
- Behavioural intent baselines are the control model you find credible for agents.
- Inline enforcement at proxy, API or gateway matches where you can intervene.
Choose Pillar Security if
- Documented coverage is slightly broader and coding agents belong in your inventory.
- Red teaming as a first class pillar rather than a test suite is the posture you want.
- MCP servers and tools catalogued alongside models is the completeness you need.
Vendor data for this comparison is unavailable.
Browse the full vendor directory