Agentic Index
DeepKeep vs Lasso Security (2026)
DeepKeep and Lasso Security both discover, red team and guard the customer's AI, and DeepKeep documents more of the grid, 8.5 of 14 against 7. That verdict is the Agentic Index coverage score, graded from each vendor's own published materials.
Lasso connects to CI/CD pipelines and cloud platforms to inventory agents, including those on Vertex AI, Microsoft Copilot, AWS Bedrock and Salesforce Agentforce, red teams them with multi turn attacks from a library of more than 3,000 payloads, and enforces intent based policies at its gateway, with a free assessment on request. DeepKeep adds a red teaming agent that pauses for the security team to steer, an inline AI Firewall, and deployment from SaaS to air gapped. Neither publishes a price. On the grid DeepKeep is Full on deployment and human oversight where Lasso is unknown and Partial; the rest of the grid matches. Choose DeepKeep for steerable testing and deployment control; choose Lasso for intent based enforcement across the major agent platforms.
On the Agentic Index AI SOC ranking, neither DeepKeep nor Lasso Security clears the bar, which asks for all five investigation loop capabilities documented in full. DeepKeep does not document workflow orchestration in full; Lasso Security does not document workflow orchestration in full, nor human oversight and guardrails. 23 of the 85 vendors in the lane clear it. See the AI SOC ranking
On the Agentic Index agent infrastructure ranking, neither DeepKeep nor Lasso Security clears the bar, which asks for all five production contract capabilities documented in full. DeepKeep does not document security and identity governance in full, nor model flexibility and routing; Lasso Security documents two of the five in full. 34 of the 186 vendors in the lane clear it. See the agent infrastructure ranking
This comparison is published by Agentic Index, an independent agentic AI vendor research platform. DeepKeep and Lasso Security are each graded against the same 14 capability Agentic Index taxonomy, from the vendor's own public materials under the Agentic Index verification standard, alongside 956 researched vendors. No vendor pays for placement and no vendor has reviewed this page. How this evidence is graded
Choose DeepKeep if
- Deployment options must be on the record; Lasso's could not be established.
- The security team should steer red teaming at key decisions; DeepKeep is Full on oversight.
- Air gapped deployment is a requirement.
Choose Lasso Security if
- Your agents run on Vertex AI, Copilot, Bedrock or Agentforce and need one inventory.
- Runtime policy should enforce intent at a gateway.
- A free assessment helps you scope the problem first.
| At a glance | DeepKeep | Lasso Security |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Security / SOC agent | Security / SOC agent |
| Entry price | Contact for pricing | Contact sales; no prices published. Demo and a free assessment on request. |
| Free / trial | No free tier or trial published. A Scan your Agent form offers an agent attack surface scan but it routes to a submission form rather than self serve access. | Free assessment on request. |
| Pricing confidence | contact only | contact only |
| Feature | D DeepKeep |
L Lasso Security |
|---|---|---|
| Action & orchestration | ||
|
Integrations & Tool Calling Ability to connect agents to real systems through native integrations, OAuth-authenticated actions, custom tools, APIs, webhooks, or MCP-compatible tools. |
Full / Explicit | Full / Explicit |
|
Workflow Orchestration Ability to sequence, branch, retry, route, and combine deterministic workflow nodes with autonomous agent steps. |
Partial | Partial |
|
Triggers & Channel Coverage How agents wake up and where they work: schedules, webhooks, message events, CRM events, inbox events, chat, email, voice, and collaboration tools. |
Full / Explicit | Full / Explicit |
| Knowledge & context | ||
|
Knowledge Grounding & RAG Ability to ground agent behavior in company data through document ingestion, retrieval, external knowledge APIs, semantic search, or RAG layers. |
Partial | Partial |
|
Memory & State Persistence Ability to persist context across a run, conversation, workflow, user, team, or longer-term memory layer. |
No / Not documented | No / Not documented |
| Control & trust | ||
|
Human Oversight & Guardrails Approval steps, consent checkpoints, escalation rules, structured guardrails, policy constraints, and pause/resume controls. |
Full / Explicit | Partial |
|
Security, Identity & Governance RBAC, SSO, auditability, encryption, least-privilege tool access, compliance posture, and data handling policy. |
Partial | Partial |
|
Observability & Auditability Traces, logs, execution histories, metrics, audit events, and debugging detail for production agent behavior. |
Full / Explicit | Full / Explicit |
|
Deployment & Data Residency Deployment modes and options, including SaaS, dedicated cloud, VPC, on-prem, hybrid, local runtime, and self-hosting. |
Full / Explicit | Unknown / Unspecified |
| Solution readiness | ||
|
Prebuilt Agents, Templates & Packs Ready-made workflows, packaged employees, templates, blueprints, industry solutions, and role-specific agents that reduce time-to-value. |
Partial | Partial |
| Platform extensibility | ||
|
Model Flexibility & Routing Ability to work across multiple foundation models, route tasks to different models, or let buyers bring their own providers and keys. |
No / Not documented | No / Not documented |
|
APIs, SDKs & MCP Extensibility Composability layer: stable APIs, SDKs, MCP tool consumption/serving, custom tools, and integration into internal systems. |
Partial | Partial |
|
Testing, Debugging & Optimization Testing, debugging, scoring, retries, fallbacks, quality gates, and optimization loops for improving agent workflows before and after deployment. |
Full / Explicit | Full / Explicit |
| Specialist automation | ||
|
Browser & Computer Use Browser, desktop, or remote/local computer control for workflows that cannot be handled through stable APIs alone. |
No / Not documented | No / Not documented |
Pricing snapshot
Sourced from the Index pricing dataset · open each vendor's profile for full detail.
| Pricing | D DeepKeep |
L Lasso Security |
|---|---|---|
|
Entry price Lowest public entry point |
Contact for pricing | Contact sales; no prices published. Demo and a free assessment on request. |
|
Pricing confidence How public the numbers are |
Contact only | Contact only |
|
Billing Primary billing axis |
Not published. No seat, token, interaction or scan unit disclosed anywhere retrieved. | Inference, not stated by the vendor: scope of models, agents and applications secured. |
|
Variable cost Workload / overage exposure |
Medium variable cost | Medium variable cost |
|
Free tier / trial Try before you buy |
No free tier
|
No free tier
|
|
Buying motion Self-serve vs sales call |
Sales call | Sales call |
More comparisons with DeepKeep or Lasso Security
Other matchups in security and SOC agents
Not the pairing you were after? These compare a different set of security and SOC agents on the same 14 capabilities.