Agentic Index
Linx Security vs Token Security (2026)
Linx Security and Token Security tie at 6.5 of 14 and both govern identities beyond people, including machine accounts and AI agents. That verdict is the Agentic Index coverage score, graded from each vendor's own published materials.
Linx maps human, non human and agent identities in real time and adds Autopilot, an autonomous remediation agent; it is quoted after a demo and listed on the AWS and Azure marketplaces. Token focuses on non human identity, with posture management, threat detection and least privilege, a conversational Token AI Agent with an MCP server, and Enzo for building identity workflows in plain language. Neither publishes a price or documents deployment. On the grid Linx is Full on human oversight and observability where Token is Partial; Token is Full on workflow orchestration and Partial on its API where Linx is Partial and None. Choose Linx to govern people and agents in one view with a remediation agent you can audit; choose Token for machine identity workflows you design.
On the Agentic Index AI SOC ranking, neither Linx Security nor Token Security clears the bar, which asks for all five investigation loop capabilities documented in full. Linx Security does not document workflow orchestration in full; Token Security does not document observability and auditability in full, nor human oversight and guardrails. 23 of the 85 vendors in the lane clear it. See the AI SOC ranking
This comparison is published by Agentic Index, an independent agentic AI vendor research platform. Linx Security and Token Security are each graded against the same 14 capability Agentic Index taxonomy, from the vendor's own public materials under the Agentic Index verification standard, alongside 955 researched vendors. No vendor pays for placement and no vendor has reviewed this page. How this evidence is graded
Choose Linx Security if
- People, machine accounts and agents should sit in one identity view.
- Remediation should be overseen and logged; Linx is Full on oversight and observability.
- Buying through AWS or Azure Marketplace helps.
Choose Token Security if
- Non human identities are the focus.
- You want to build identity workflows in plain language; Token is Full on orchestration.
- Some API and MCP access matters; Token is Partial and Linx None.
| Feature | L Linx Security |
T Token Security |
|---|---|---|
| Action & orchestration | ||
|
Integrations & Tool Calling Ability to connect agents to real systems through native integrations, OAuth-authenticated actions, custom tools, APIs, webhooks, or MCP-compatible tools. |
||
|
Linx SecurityIntegrations & Tool Calling Connectors reach GitHub, GitLab, Snowflake, AWS, Salesforce, Datadog and identity providers, and the platform acts in them. Provisioning, access changes, joiner, mover and leaver workflows and remediation run without other teams doing the work, across SaaS, cloud and on premises systems. Linx is also listed on AWS Marketplace and Azure Marketplace. SourceLinx Security, linx.security and /platform/automation-remediationread 2026-10-06 |
||
|
Token SecurityIntegrations & Tool Calling Enzo applications send Slack notifications, run email workflows, open tickets, handle lifecycle management and run remediation actions against connected systems. The Token MCP Server can generate remediation scripts and even initiate actions. Token integrates with ticketing (Jira, ServiceNow), chat (Slack, Microsoft Teams), the major clouds, identity providers and secrets vaults. Sourcetoken.security/blog/introducing-enzo-by-token-security-the-ai-native-identity-security-application-builderread 2026-09-28 |
||
|
Workflow Orchestration Ability to sequence, branch, retry, route, and combine deterministic workflow nodes with autonomous agent steps. |
||
|
Linx SecurityWorkflow Orchestration Joiner, mover and leaver workflows run automatically when events trigger them, and Autopilot moves from detection to remediation or escalation on its own. Linx also orchestrates access requests, approvals and provisioning across SaaS, cloud and on premises systems. These flows come built in. Linx names no workflow builder, branching the customer designs or multi agent handoff. SourceLinx Security, linx.security and /platform/automation-remediationread 2026-10-06 |
||
|
Token SecurityWorkflow Orchestration Enzo lets security teams describe and build their own live applications, workflows and automations in natural language, with workflow triggers and recurring identity operations. The platform also triggers remediation workflows on dynamic risk thresholds. Sourcetoken.security/blog/introducing-enzo-by-token-security-the-ai-native-identity-security-application-builderread 2026-09-28 |
||
|
Triggers & Channel Coverage How agents wake up and where they work: schedules, webhooks, message events, CRM events, inbox events, chat, email, voice, and collaboration tools. |
||
|
Linx SecurityTriggers & Channel Coverage Autopilot detects newly assigned privileged access, departmental moves, shifts in user responsibilities and other high impact changes the moment they happen, around the clock rather than on a schedule. Joiner, mover and leaver workflows execute automatically when events trigger them. SourceLinx Security, linx.security/platform/autopilot and /platform/automation-remediationread 2026-10-06 |
||
|
Token SecurityTriggers & Channel Coverage The platform triggers intelligent remediation workflows based on dynamic risk thresholds and contextual awareness, so detected risk starts the work without a person. Enzo adds workflow triggers and recurring identity operations. Sourcetoken.securityread 2026-09-28 |
||
| Knowledge & context | ||
|
Knowledge Grounding & RAG Ability to ground agent behavior in company data through document ingestion, retrieval, external knowledge APIs, semantic search, or RAG layers. |
||
|
Linx SecurityKnowledge Grounding & RAG An identity graph continuously maps the customer's human, non human and AI agent identities, their relationships and access paths, and Autopilot and the Assistant reason over it. It covers service accounts and API keys, which often outlive their purpose, and AI agents that act at machine speed on permissions borrowed from someone else. SourceLinx Security, linx.securityread 2026-10-06 |
||
|
Token SecurityKnowledge Grounding & RAG The Token AI Agent, the MCP Server and Enzo all draw on the same live identity context, which Token keeps current across the customer's own estate. It maps human and non human identities, AI agents, cloud and SaaS accounts, secrets and credentials, each with its owner and blast radius. Sourcetoken.security/blog/introducing-the-first-nhi-mcp-server-ai-powered-smarter-driving-fast-remediationread 2026-09-28 |
||
|
Memory & State Persistence Ability to persist context across a run, conversation, workflow, user, team, or longer-term memory layer. |
||
|
Linx SecurityMemory & State Persistence Linx names no memory store for its agents, what it would keep or for how long. The identity graph and its history are the customer's identity data, and they ground what the agents reason about. SourceLinx Security, linx.security/platform/autopilotread 2026-10-06 |
||
|
Token SecurityMemory & State Persistence No memory is named for the Token AI Agent or Enzo, and Token gives no scope or lifetime for one. The identity inventory and behavioral baselines are Token's data model of the customer's estate. Sourcetoken.security/productread 2026-09-28 |
||
| Control & trust | ||
|
Human Oversight & Guardrails Approval steps, consent checkpoints, escalation rules, structured guardrails, policy constraints, and pause/resume controls. |
||
|
Linx SecurityHuman Oversight & Guardrails Autopilot acts on its own only on high confidence, policy aligned risks and escalates ambiguous or high impact changes to a person with full context assembled, who decides. It uses the identity graph to weigh context and policy before choosing whether to act or to put the right information in front of the right person. Access requests go through approver workflows. SourceLinx Security, linx.security/platform/autopilot and linx.securityread 2026-10-06 |
||
|
Token SecurityHuman Oversight & Guardrails Remediation in Enzo comes as a recommendation with one click actions, so the decision stays with the team. Approvals are among the workflows Enzo can support. Token names no approval step that holds an agent action until a person signs off. Its policy controls govern the customer's own AI agents, not Token's. Sourcetoken.security/blog/introducing-enzo-by-token-security-the-ai-native-identity-security-application-builderread 2026-09-28 |
||
|
Security, Identity & Governance RBAC, SSO, auditability, encryption, least-privilege tool access, compliance posture, and data handling policy. |
||
|
Linx SecuritySecurity, Identity & Governance Linx displays SOC 2 and HIPAA badges and runs a trust center at trust.linx.security. It names no SSO, SCIM or roles for its own console. Its access controls, such as least privilege and time bound access, govern the customer's identities, not access to Linx. SourceLinx Security, linx.securityread 2026-10-06 |
||
|
Token SecuritySecurity, Identity & Governance Token is ISO/IEC 27001:2022 certified and holds SOC 2 Type 2. It names no customer facing SSO, roles or admin audit log for its own console. Sourcetrust.token.securityread 2026-09-28 |
||
|
Observability & Auditability Traces, logs, execution histories, metrics, audit events, and debugging detail for production agent behavior. |
||
|
Linx SecurityObservability & Auditability Every Autopilot action is logged, policy scoped and auditable, and every remediation decision, whether Linx acts on its own or escalates to a person, is logged and traceable for incident response and regulators. Automated user access reviews keep audits fast and clean. SourceLinx Security, linx.security/platform/autopilot, /platform/automation-remediation and linx.securityread 2026-10-06 |
||
|
Token SecurityObservability & Auditability Actions taken by Enzo applications are audited with full audit logging, so Token's own automation leaves an action log. Token names no run trace of the Token AI Agent or of Enzo's steps. Its immutable logs and audit trails record what the customer's AI agents do, not what Token's own agent does. Sourcetoken.security/blog/introducing-enzo-by-token-security-the-ai-native-identity-security-application-builderread 2026-09-28 |
||
|
Deployment & Data Residency Deployment modes and options, including SaaS, dedicated cloud, VPC, on-prem, hybrid, local runtime, and self-hosting. |
||
|
Linx SecurityDeployment & Data Residency No hosting region is published, and Linx names no choice of region or customer environment option. It is sold through AWS Marketplace and Azure Marketplace, and its trust center sits at trust.linx.security. SourceLinx Security, linx.security; trust.linx.securityread 2026-10-06 |
||
|
Token SecurityDeployment & Data Residency No hosting region is published for the service itself, and Token names no option to run in the customer's environment. Its coverage of on premises, hybrid and cloud environments is where it discovers identities, not where it runs. Sourcedocs.token.securityread 2026-09-28 |
||
| Solution readiness | ||
|
Prebuilt Agents, Templates & Packs Ready-made workflows, packaged employees, templates, blueprints, industry solutions, and role-specific agents that reduce time-to-value. |
||
|
Linx SecurityPrebuilt Agents, Templates & Packs Two named agents, Autopilot for autonomous remediation and the Assistant for identity intelligence, come with built in joiner, mover and leaver workflows. Just in time access replaces standing privileges with time bound, right sized access, and automated user access reviews are part of the platform. Linx names no catalog of templates or wider agent set. SourceLinx Security, linx.securityread 2026-10-06 |
||
|
Token SecurityPrebuilt Agents, Templates & Packs Token ships one conversational agent, the Token AI Agent, and the MCP Server. Example Enzo applications include a Clean Exit Checklist and access review workflows. Token names no library of prebuilt agents or templates that a customer installs. Sourcetoken.security/blog/introducing-enzo-by-token-security-the-ai-native-identity-security-application-builderread 2026-09-28 |
||
| Platform extensibility | ||
|
Model Flexibility & Routing Ability to work across multiple foundation models, route tasks to different models, or let buyers bring their own providers and keys. |
||
|
Linx SecurityModel Flexibility & Routing The models and providers behind Autopilot and the Assistant are not named, and Linx does not say whether customers can choose a model. The Assistant puts the same identity intelligence in front of the security team. SourceLinx Security, linx.securityread 2026-10-06 |
||
|
Token SecurityModel Flexibility & Routing The model behind the Token AI Agent and Enzo is not named, and no choice of provider is offered. Customers can point their own assistant, such as Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini or Cursor, at the Token MCP Server, and that assistant then uses Token's tools on its own model. The AI platforms Token integrates with are estates it discovers. Sourcetoken.security/integrationsread 2026-09-28 |
||
|
APIs, SDKs & MCP Extensibility Composability layer: stable APIs, SDKs, MCP tool consumption/serving, custom tools, and integration into internal systems. |
||
|
Linx SecurityAPIs, SDKs & MCP Extensibility No API, SDK or MCP server for the Linx platform is published. Its connectors pull data in from other systems and act in them, but give other systems no way to call Linx. SourceLinx Security, linx.securityread 2026-10-06 |
||
|
Token SecurityAPIs, SDKs & MCP Extensibility The Token MCP Server lets Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini and Cursor query inventory, risk and blast radius, and initiate actions. Token publishes no endpoint, authentication scheme or tool list for it, and names no public REST API or SDK. Product documentation lives at docs.token.security. Sourcetoken.security/blog/introducing-the-first-nhi-mcp-server-ai-powered-smarter-driving-fast-remediationread 2026-09-28 |
||
|
Testing, Debugging & Optimization Testing, debugging, scoring, retries, fallbacks, quality gates, and optimization loops for improving agent workflows before and after deployment. |
||
|
Linx SecurityTesting, Debugging & Optimization For Autopilot's decisions, Linx names no evaluation harness, scored test cases, simulation or gate. The risk analysis Linx runs looks at the customer's access, not at how well the agent itself performs. SourceLinx Security, linx.security/platform/autopilotread 2026-10-06 |
||
|
Token SecurityTesting, Debugging & Optimization The Token AI Agent and Enzo applications have no published test harness with scored cases, preview or quality gate. Attack path analysis and compliance validation test the customer's estate, not Token's agent. Sourcetoken.security/productread 2026-09-28 |
||
| Specialist automation | ||
|
Browser & Computer Use Browser, desktop, or remote/local computer control for workflows that cannot be handled through stable APIs alone. |
||
|
Linx SecurityBrowser & Computer Use Remediation runs through connectors, and Linx does not say that any agent drives a browser, desktop or remote computer. SourceLinx Security, linx.securityread 2026-10-06 |
||
|
Token SecurityBrowser & Computer Use Integrations with clouds, identity providers and vaults run through APIs, and Token names no agent that operates a browser or desktop. Sourcetoken.security/integrationsread 2026-09-28 |
||
Pricing snapshot
Sourced from the Index pricing dataset · open each vendor's profile for full detail.
| Pricing | L Linx Security |
T Token Security |
|---|---|---|
|
Entry price Lowest public entry point |
Not public; quoted through sales, also listed on AWS and Azure Marketplace | Not public; quoted through enterprise engagement with no self serve tier |
|
Pricing confidence How public the numbers are |
Contact only | Contact only |
|
Billing Primary billing axis |
not published | enterprise subscription; basis not disclosed |
|
Variable cost Workload / overage exposure |
Medium variable cost | Medium variable cost |
|
Free tier / trial Try before you buy |
No free tierTrial
|
No free tier
|
|
Buying motion Self-serve vs sales call |
Sales call | Sales call |
More comparisons with Linx Security or Token Security
Other matchups in security and SOC agents
Not the pairing you were after? These compare a different set of security and SOC agents on the same 14 capabilities.