Agentic Index

Dust vs Ema (2026)

Dust last verified ·Ema last verified

Build them or hire them. That verdict is the Agentic Index coverage score, graded from each vendor's own published materials.

Dust is a workspace platform where your teams build agents grounded on company data across Notion, Slack and Drive, self serve at €30 per seat a month, or €24 billed yearly, with a free seat to start. Ema ships prebuilt AI employees for HR, finance and operations, priced on outcomes through sales after a self serve trial. This is not a capability decision. It is whether you want a surface your people build on or roles that arrive already defined.

This comparison is published by Agentic Index, an independent agentic AI vendor research platform. Dust and Ema are each graded against the same 14 capability Agentic Index taxonomy, from the vendor's own public materials under the Agentic Index verification standard, alongside 1,084 researched vendors. No vendor pays for placement and no vendor has reviewed this page. How this evidence is graded

Choose Dust if

  • You want your own teams building agents, and the knowledge is spread across your workspace tools.
  • Public pricing and a free seat let you start without a procurement cycle.
  • Model flexibility and observability matter for agents your organization will keep changing.

Choose Ema if

  • You want defined roles delivered rather than a platform to build them on.
  • HR, finance and operations are the target functions and prebuilt depth there saves you months.
  • It has to run on premises or air gapped, with approval chains that pass a decision through several people in turn.
Feature
D
Dust
E
Ema
Action & orchestration

Integrations & Tool Calling

Ability to connect agents to real systems through native integrations, OAuth-authenticated actions, custom tools, APIs, webhooks, or MCP-compatible tools.

Workflow Orchestration

Ability to sequence, branch, retry, route, and combine deterministic workflow nodes with autonomous agent steps.

Triggers & Channel Coverage

How agents wake up and where they work: schedules, webhooks, message events, CRM events, inbox events, chat, email, voice, and collaboration tools.

Knowledge & context

Knowledge Grounding & RAG

Ability to ground agent behavior in company data through document ingestion, retrieval, external knowledge APIs, semantic search, or RAG layers.

Memory & State Persistence

Ability to persist context across a run, conversation, workflow, user, team, or longer-term memory layer.

Control & trust

Human Oversight & Guardrails

Approval steps, consent checkpoints, escalation rules, structured guardrails, policy constraints, and pause/resume controls.

Security, Identity & Governance

RBAC, SSO, auditability, encryption, least-privilege tool access, compliance posture, and data handling policy.

Observability & Auditability

Traces, logs, execution histories, metrics, audit events, and debugging detail for production agent behavior.

Deployment & Data Residency

Deployment modes and options, including SaaS, dedicated cloud, VPC, on-prem, hybrid, local runtime, and self-hosting.

Solution readiness

Prebuilt Agents, Templates & Packs

Ready-made workflows, packaged employees, templates, blueprints, industry solutions, and role-specific agents that reduce time-to-value.

Platform extensibility

Model Flexibility & Routing

Ability to work across multiple foundation models, route tasks to different models, or let buyers bring their own providers and keys.

APIs, SDKs & MCP Extensibility

Composability layer: stable APIs, SDKs, MCP tool consumption/serving, custom tools, and integration into internal systems.

Testing, Debugging & Optimization

Testing, debugging, scoring, retries, fallbacks, quality gates, and optimization loops for improving agent workflows before and after deployment.

Specialist automation

Browser & Computer Use

Browser, desktop, or remote/local computer control for workflows that cannot be handled through stable APIs alone.

Pricing snapshot

Sourced from the Index pricing dataset · open each vendor's profile for full detail.

Pricing
D
Dust
E
Ema

Entry price

Lowest public entry point

Free seat at 0€ with 500 lifetime credits; paid entry is Pro at 24€ per seat per month billed yearly (30€ monthly), and Max at 120€ yearly (150€ monthly). All excluding VAT. Enterprise on application. Figures are euros, not dollars. Contact sales for paid access. A free trial is self serve at try.ema.ai. Pricing is outcome based, not per seat. No figure, unit or minimum is published.

Pricing confidence

How public the numbers are

Public, exact Contact only

Billing

Primary billing axis

Per seat per month with a monthly credit allocation attached to each seat, across three seat types inside one self serve Business plan, plus a sales led Enterprise plan. Seats are priced in euros excluding VAT; programmatic API usage is priced in US dollars at $0.01 per credit. Admins assign a seat type per user and can mix and reassign them at any time. Outcome based, not per seat. Ema's pitch reads "Consolidate SaaS, Outcome-based pricing, No unused module, No tokenmaxxing." Ema sells AI Employees as substitutes for headcount, so the unit is work delivered, not users licensed. No rate, unit definition or minimum is published, and nothing says what an outcome is measured as, whether a resolved ticket, a completed workflow or a filled role.

Variable cost

Workload / overage exposure

Medium variable cost High variable cost

Free tier / trial

Try before you buy

Free tierTrial
No free tierTrial

Buying motion

Self-serve vs sales call

Mixed Mixed

Pricing verified

When this pricing was last checked

Product updates

Newest first, each linked to its source.

Dust

  • · Workflow orchestration

    Dust Default, the platform's default agent, can now create, update and remove any trigger type Dust supports, including scheduled runs and event based automations.

    Source
  • · Security / enterprise

    Each Pod in Dust now has its own settings for which network domains its agent sandboxes may reach and which variables and secrets they hold.

    Source
  • · Human approval / guardrails

    Dust added controls for credit spend checkpoints on individual agents in Agent Builder and across the workspace in Usage settings.

    Source

Ema

  • · Observability / auditability

    Ema added evaluation for its orchestrator AI Employees.

    Source

Other matchups in enterprise operations agents

Not the pairing you were after? These compare a different set of enterprise operations agents on the same 14 capabilities.

See all 230 enterprise operations agents comparisons

Contact us

Found a vendor we missed? Have feedback on the index? We'd love to hear from you.