Agentic Index

Decagon vs Fin (2026)

Both vendors last verified

The pricing models are as different as the products. That verdict is the Agentic Index coverage score, graded from each vendor's own published materials.

Fin charges $0.99 per outcome, and as a standalone agent on another helpdesk it carries a 50 outcome monthly minimum of $49.50. Decagon is built for support teams, integrates deeply with their tools and quotes through sales. Fin is the one you can price before the call. Decagon is the one you configure to a support operation that has outgrown packaged tooling.

This comparison is published by Agentic Index, an independent agentic AI vendor research platform. Decagon and Fin are each graded against the same 14 capability Agentic Index taxonomy, from the vendor's own public materials under the Agentic Index verification standard, alongside 1,084 researched vendors. No vendor pays for placement and no vendor has reviewed this page. How this evidence is graded

Choose Decagon if

  • Deep integration into an existing support toolchain is the requirement and you want it configured to you.
  • Customer context should carry across sessions and channels.
  • Your volume and complexity justify a sales led implementation rather than a packaged product.

Choose Fin if

  • You want to model cost before committing, and $0.99 per outcome is a number you can forecast.
  • Simulation based testing before deployment is a requirement.
  • You are already on Intercom, or you want to start standalone at $49.50 a month without a sales cycle.
Feature
D
Decagon
F
Fin
Action & orchestration

Integrations & Tool Calling

Ability to connect agents to real systems through native integrations, OAuth-authenticated actions, custom tools, APIs, webhooks, or MCP-compatible tools.

Workflow Orchestration

Ability to sequence, branch, retry, route, and combine deterministic workflow nodes with autonomous agent steps.

Triggers & Channel Coverage

How agents wake up and where they work: schedules, webhooks, message events, CRM events, inbox events, chat, email, voice, and collaboration tools.

Knowledge & context

Knowledge Grounding & RAG

Ability to ground agent behavior in company data through document ingestion, retrieval, external knowledge APIs, semantic search, or RAG layers.

Memory & State Persistence

Ability to persist context across a run, conversation, workflow, user, team, or longer-term memory layer.

Control & trust

Human Oversight & Guardrails

Approval steps, consent checkpoints, escalation rules, structured guardrails, policy constraints, and pause/resume controls.

Security, Identity & Governance

RBAC, SSO, auditability, encryption, least-privilege tool access, compliance posture, and data handling policy.

Observability & Auditability

Traces, logs, execution histories, metrics, audit events, and debugging detail for production agent behavior.

Deployment & Data Residency

Deployment modes and options, including SaaS, dedicated cloud, VPC, on-prem, hybrid, local runtime, and self-hosting.

Solution readiness

Prebuilt Agents, Templates & Packs

Ready-made workflows, packaged employees, templates, blueprints, industry solutions, and role-specific agents that reduce time-to-value.

Platform extensibility

Model Flexibility & Routing

Ability to work across multiple foundation models, route tasks to different models, or let buyers bring their own providers and keys.

APIs, SDKs & MCP Extensibility

Composability layer: stable APIs, SDKs, MCP tool consumption/serving, custom tools, and integration into internal systems.

Testing, Debugging & Optimization

Testing, debugging, scoring, retries, fallbacks, quality gates, and optimization loops for improving agent workflows before and after deployment.

Specialist automation

Browser & Computer Use

Browser, desktop, or remote/local computer control for workflows that cannot be handled through stable APIs alone.

Pricing snapshot

Sourced from the Index pricing dataset · open each vendor's profile for full detail.

Pricing
D
Decagon
F
Fin

Entry price

Lowest public entry point

Contact sales $0.99 per outcome

Pricing confidence

How public the numbers are

Contact only Public, exact

Billing

Primary billing axis

Usage, per conversation or per resolution. Per conversation is the default and bills every interaction, and per resolution charges a higher rate only for conversations the AI fully resolves. Outcomes, at $0.99 each, plus helpdesk seats when Fin runs inside Intercom.

Variable cost

Workload / overage exposure

High variable cost High variable cost

Free tier / trial

Try before you buy

No free tier
No free tierTrial

Buying motion

Self-serve vs sales call

Sales call Mixed

Pricing verified

When this pricing was last checked

Product updates

Newest first, each linked to its source.

Decagon

  • · MCP / tool calling / API

    The Personal Agent Consent & Trust Protocol (PACT), which Decagon open sourced with Instinct, builds on the Agent2Agent protocol and OAuth 2.0 so a business can verify which personal agent is calling and what the customer has authorized it to do.

    Source
  • · Agent capability

    Decagon released Voice 3, a voice agent rebuilt so a fast conversational model listens and speaks while a stronger model handles reasoning, tools and guardrails in parallel.

    Source
  • · Browser/computer use

    Decagon introduced Browser Actions, a feature that allows its AI agents to access and complete tasks inside any web-based system.

    Source

Fin

  • · Human approval / guardrails

    When a conversation needs a review, a piece of information or an approval, Fin now loops in a human teammate to approve, edit or take over, instead of escalating and leaving.

    Source
  • · Observability / auditability

    Intercom introduced custom reporting metrics that can be filtered by Fin AI Agent ratings or used to count escalations from AI agents to humans.

    Source
  • · Observability / auditability

    Intercom launched Evals and Releases for Fin, providing tools to test AI agent changes before deployment, control gradual rollouts, and monitor live conversations for quality.

    Source

Other matchups in customer support agents

Not the pairing you were after? These compare a different set of customer support agents on the same 14 capabilities.

See all 136 customer support agents comparisons

Contact us

Found a vendor we missed? Have feedback on the index? We'd love to hear from you.