Agentic Index
Cyware vs D3 Security (Morpheus) (2026)
Both are SOAR vendors that rebuilt around autonomous triage, and D3 publishes more numbers than almost anyone in this lane. That verdict is the Agentic Index coverage score, graded from each vendor's own published materials.
D3's Morpheus runs full L2 depth attack path discovery on every alert with runtime generated playbooks and a structured case file in under two minutes, claiming up to 95 percent of alerts triaged in that window, with published testing at 87 percent attack path revelation and 94 percent closure, plus four region residency and on premise. Cyware brings Cyber Fusion, an agent fabric spanning intelligence, detection engineering and response, documenting 12 of 14 against D3 at 10. Cyware for intelligence depth, D3 for measured triage throughput.
On the Agentic Index AI SOC ranking, Cyware and D3 Security (Morpheus) both clear the bar: each documents all five investigation loop capabilities in full. 24 of the 94 vendors in the lane clear it. See the AI SOC ranking
This comparison is published by Agentic Index, an independent agentic AI vendor research platform. Cyware and D3 Security (Morpheus) are each graded against the same 14 capability Agentic Index taxonomy, from the vendor's own public materials under the Agentic Index verification standard, alongside 969 researched vendors. No vendor pays for placement and no vendor has reviewed this page. How this evidence is graded
Choose Cyware if
- Intelligence is the practice: enrichment, sharing networks and detection engineering.
- Broader documented coverage across the matrix is the safer enterprise bet.
- Modular purchasing lets you buy the parts of the fabric you actually need.
Choose D3 Security (Morpheus) if
- Published testing results are what you evaluate on, and most vendors in this lane publish none.
- Alert volume is the problem and L2 depth investigation on every alert is the claim to test.
- Data residency across four regions plus on premise is a procurement requirement.
| At a glance | Cyware | D3 Security (Morpheus) |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Security / SOC agent | Security / SOC agent |
| Entry price | Contact sales (modular components) | Contact sales |
| Free / trial | No public free tier; demo request. AI features optional and admin controllable | Not published |
| Pricing confidence | contact only | contact only |
| Feature | C Cyware |
D D3 Security (Morpheus) |
|---|---|---|
| Action & orchestration | ||
|
Integrations & Tool Calling Ability to connect agents to real systems through native integrations, OAuth-authenticated actions, custom tools, APIs, webhooks, or MCP-compatible tools. |
Full / Explicit | Full / Explicit |
|
Workflow Orchestration Ability to sequence, branch, retry, route, and combine deterministic workflow nodes with autonomous agent steps. |
Full / Explicit | Full / Explicit |
|
Triggers & Channel Coverage How agents wake up and where they work: schedules, webhooks, message events, CRM events, inbox events, chat, email, voice, and collaboration tools. |
Full / Explicit | Full / Explicit |
| Knowledge & context | ||
|
Knowledge Grounding & RAG Ability to ground agent behavior in company data through document ingestion, retrieval, external knowledge APIs, semantic search, or RAG layers. |
Full / Explicit | Full / Explicit |
|
Memory & State Persistence Ability to persist context across a run, conversation, workflow, user, team, or longer-term memory layer. |
Partial | Partial |
| Control & trust | ||
|
Human Oversight & Guardrails Approval steps, consent checkpoints, escalation rules, structured guardrails, policy constraints, and pause/resume controls. |
Full / Explicit | Full / Explicit |
|
Security, Identity & Governance RBAC, SSO, auditability, encryption, least-privilege tool access, compliance posture, and data handling policy. |
Full / Explicit | Full / Explicit |
|
Observability & Auditability Traces, logs, execution histories, metrics, audit events, and debugging detail for production agent behavior. |
Full / Explicit | Full / Explicit |
|
Deployment & Data Residency Deployment modes and options, including SaaS, dedicated cloud, VPC, on-prem, hybrid, local runtime, and self-hosting. |
Full / Explicit | Full / Explicit |
| Solution readiness | ||
|
Prebuilt Agents, Templates & Packs Ready-made workflows, packaged employees, templates, blueprints, industry solutions, and role-specific agents that reduce time-to-value. |
Full / Explicit | Partial |
| Platform extensibility | ||
|
Model Flexibility & Routing Ability to work across multiple foundation models, route tasks to different models, or let buyers bring their own providers and keys. |
Partial | No / Not documented |
|
APIs, SDKs & MCP Extensibility Composability layer: stable APIs, SDKs, MCP tool consumption/serving, custom tools, and integration into internal systems. |
Full / Explicit | Partial |
|
Testing, Debugging & Optimization Testing, debugging, scoring, retries, fallbacks, quality gates, and optimization loops for improving agent workflows before and after deployment. |
Partial | Partial |
| Specialist automation | ||
|
Browser & Computer Use Browser, desktop, or remote/local computer control for workflows that cannot be handled through stable APIs alone. |
Partial | No / Not documented |
Pricing snapshot
Sourced from the Index pricing dataset · open each vendor's profile for full detail.
| Pricing | C Cyware |
D D3 Security (Morpheus) |
|---|---|---|
|
Entry price Lowest public entry point |
Contact sales (modular components) | Contact sales |
|
Pricing confidence How public the numbers are |
Contact only | Contact only |
|
Billing Primary billing axis |
modular components (TIP, SOAR, threat sharing); AI features optional | annual platform subscription sized to the SOC, with an included envelope of AI investigations |
|
Variable cost Workload / overage exposure |
Medium variable cost | Low variable cost |
|
Free tier / trial Try before you buy |
No free tier
|
No free tier
|
|
Buying motion Self-serve vs sales call |
Sales call | Sales call |
More comparisons with Cyware or D3 Security (Morpheus)
Other matchups in security and SOC agents
Not the pairing you were after? These compare a different set of security and SOC agents on the same 14 capabilities.