Agentic Index

Cresta vs Decagon (2026)

Both vendors last verified

Both serve large contact centers and they differ on whether humans stay in the picture. That verdict is the Agentic Index coverage score, graded from each vendor's own published materials.

Cresta unifies autonomous agents, real time human agent assist and conversation intelligence on one system for large contact centers. Decagon is purpose built for support automation with deep toolchain integration. If your contact center is staying staffed and you want the agents and the humans improving together, Cresta is built for that. If you are automating toward fewer conversations reaching a person, Decagon is the more direct route.

This comparison is published by Agentic Index, an independent agentic AI vendor research platform. Cresta and Decagon are each graded against the same 14 capability Agentic Index taxonomy, from the vendor's own public materials under the Agentic Index verification standard, alongside 1,084 researched vendors. No vendor pays for placement and no vendor has reviewed this page. How this evidence is graded

Choose Cresta if

  • Your contact center will remain staffed and needs real time assist for its agents.
  • Real time agent assist improves the humans you keep, which automation alone does not.
  • Conversation intelligence across both human and AI conversations is the visibility you want.

Choose Decagon if

  • Autonomous resolution is the goal and human assist is not what you are buying.
  • Deep integration into your support toolchain is the practical constraint.
  • A purpose built support product is simpler to deploy than a contact center platform.
Feature
C
Cresta
D
Decagon
Action & orchestration

Integrations & Tool Calling

Ability to connect agents to real systems through native integrations, OAuth-authenticated actions, custom tools, APIs, webhooks, or MCP-compatible tools.

Workflow Orchestration

Ability to sequence, branch, retry, route, and combine deterministic workflow nodes with autonomous agent steps.

Triggers & Channel Coverage

How agents wake up and where they work: schedules, webhooks, message events, CRM events, inbox events, chat, email, voice, and collaboration tools.

Knowledge & context

Knowledge Grounding & RAG

Ability to ground agent behavior in company data through document ingestion, retrieval, external knowledge APIs, semantic search, or RAG layers.

Memory & State Persistence

Ability to persist context across a run, conversation, workflow, user, team, or longer-term memory layer.

Control & trust

Human Oversight & Guardrails

Approval steps, consent checkpoints, escalation rules, structured guardrails, policy constraints, and pause/resume controls.

Security, Identity & Governance

RBAC, SSO, auditability, encryption, least-privilege tool access, compliance posture, and data handling policy.

Observability & Auditability

Traces, logs, execution histories, metrics, audit events, and debugging detail for production agent behavior.

Deployment & Data Residency

Deployment modes and options, including SaaS, dedicated cloud, VPC, on-prem, hybrid, local runtime, and self-hosting.

Solution readiness

Prebuilt Agents, Templates & Packs

Ready-made workflows, packaged employees, templates, blueprints, industry solutions, and role-specific agents that reduce time-to-value.

Platform extensibility

Model Flexibility & Routing

Ability to work across multiple foundation models, route tasks to different models, or let buyers bring their own providers and keys.

APIs, SDKs & MCP Extensibility

Composability layer: stable APIs, SDKs, MCP tool consumption/serving, custom tools, and integration into internal systems.

Testing, Debugging & Optimization

Testing, debugging, scoring, retries, fallbacks, quality gates, and optimization loops for improving agent workflows before and after deployment.

Specialist automation

Browser & Computer Use

Browser, desktop, or remote/local computer control for workflows that cannot be handled through stable APIs alone.

Pricing snapshot

Sourced from the Index pricing dataset · open each vendor's profile for full detail.

Pricing
C
Cresta
D
Decagon

Entry price

Lowest public entry point

Contact for pricing Contact sales

Pricing confidence

How public the numbers are

Contact only Contact only

Billing

Primary billing axis

— Usage, per conversation or per resolution. Per conversation is the default and bills every interaction, and per resolution charges a higher rate only for conversations the AI fully resolves.

Variable cost

Workload / overage exposure

Medium variable cost High variable cost

Free tier / trial

Try before you buy

No free tier
No free tier

Buying motion

Self-serve vs sales call

— Sales call

Pricing verified

When this pricing was last checked

Product updates

Newest first, each linked to its source.

Cresta

  • · Agent capability

    The AI Analyst in Trends + Insights now answers natural language questions with reports, charts, comparisons and text documents, and shows the supporting evidence behind each answer.

    Source
  • · Agent capability

    Deputy Agent, launched by Cresta, is a long running agent that carries customer operations work such as refunds, transaction disputes and insurance claim appeals through to completion.

    Source
  • · Deployment / data residency

    Agent configurations in Cresta can now move through testing, staging and production with new environments and deployments.

    Source

Decagon

  • · MCP / tool calling / API

    The Personal Agent Consent & Trust Protocol (PACT), which Decagon open sourced with Instinct, builds on the Agent2Agent protocol and OAuth 2.0 so a business can verify which personal agent is calling and what the customer has authorized it to do.

    Source
  • · Agent capability

    Decagon released Voice 3, a voice agent rebuilt so a fast conversational model listens and speaks while a stronger model handles reasoning, tools and guardrails in parallel.

    Source
  • · Browser/computer use

    Decagon introduced Browser Actions, a feature that allows its AI agents to access and complete tasks inside any web-based system.

    Source

Other matchups in customer support agents

Not the pairing you were after? These compare a different set of customer support agents on the same 14 capabilities.

See all 136 customer support agents comparisons

Contact us

Found a vendor we missed? Have feedback on the index? We'd love to hear from you.