Agentic Index

Coworker vs Glean (2026)

Coworker last verified ·Glean last verified

Coworker and Glean both build a knowledge layer under enterprise agents. That verdict is the Agentic Index coverage score, graded from each vendor's own published materials.

Glean unifies search, assistant and agents over a permissions aware knowledge graph across more than a hundred connected systems, quoted through sales. Coworker pairs an organizational memory knowledge graph with model routing, more than fifty read and write connectors, a no code agent builder and approval gates, on one Enterprise plan priced on application. The write side of those connectors is Coworker's argument, and Glean's is connector breadth and permissions depth.

On the Agentic Index MCP platform ranking, Coworker and Glean both clear the bar: each documents all three interoperability capabilities in full. 142 of the 554 platforms it grades clear it. See the MCP platform ranking

This comparison is published by Agentic Index, an independent agentic AI vendor research platform. Coworker and Glean are each graded against the same 14 capability Agentic Index taxonomy, from the vendor's own public materials under the Agentic Index verification standard, alongside 1,084 researched vendors. No vendor pays for placement and no vendor has reviewed this page. How this evidence is graded

Choose Coworker if

  • A published per user price lets you budget this without a sales cycle.
  • Write connectors matter: you want agents doing things, not only finding things.
  • Approval gates and model routing are the governance controls you need.

Choose Glean if

  • Connector breadth across a hundred plus systems is the requirement for your estate.
  • Permissions aware search is the hard part, and getting it wrong is a security incident.
  • Enterprise scale adoption and reference density lower the risk of the decision.
Feature
C
Coworker
G
Glean
Action & orchestration

Integrations & Tool Calling

Ability to connect agents to real systems through native integrations, OAuth-authenticated actions, custom tools, APIs, webhooks, or MCP-compatible tools.

Workflow Orchestration

Ability to sequence, branch, retry, route, and combine deterministic workflow nodes with autonomous agent steps.

Triggers & Channel Coverage

How agents wake up and where they work: schedules, webhooks, message events, CRM events, inbox events, chat, email, voice, and collaboration tools.

Knowledge & context

Knowledge Grounding & RAG

Ability to ground agent behavior in company data through document ingestion, retrieval, external knowledge APIs, semantic search, or RAG layers.

Memory & State Persistence

Ability to persist context across a run, conversation, workflow, user, team, or longer-term memory layer.

Control & trust

Human Oversight & Guardrails

Approval steps, consent checkpoints, escalation rules, structured guardrails, policy constraints, and pause/resume controls.

Security, Identity & Governance

RBAC, SSO, auditability, encryption, least-privilege tool access, compliance posture, and data handling policy.

Observability & Auditability

Traces, logs, execution histories, metrics, audit events, and debugging detail for production agent behavior.

Deployment & Data Residency

Deployment modes and options, including SaaS, dedicated cloud, VPC, on-prem, hybrid, local runtime, and self-hosting.

Solution readiness

Prebuilt Agents, Templates & Packs

Ready-made workflows, packaged employees, templates, blueprints, industry solutions, and role-specific agents that reduce time-to-value.

Platform extensibility

Model Flexibility & Routing

Ability to work across multiple foundation models, route tasks to different models, or let buyers bring their own providers and keys.

APIs, SDKs & MCP Extensibility

Composability layer: stable APIs, SDKs, MCP tool consumption/serving, custom tools, and integration into internal systems.

Testing, Debugging & Optimization

Testing, debugging, scoring, retries, fallbacks, quality gates, and optimization loops for improving agent workflows before and after deployment.

Specialist automation

Browser & Computer Use

Browser, desktop, or remote/local computer control for workflows that cannot be handled through stable APIs alone.

Pricing snapshot

Sourced from the Index pricing dataset · open each vendor's profile for full detail.

Pricing
C
Coworker
G
Glean

Entry price

Lowest public entry point

Priced on application. Coworker sells one Enterprise plan with every product included, scoped with the customer before purchase. Contact for pricing

Pricing confidence

How public the numbers are

Public, partial Contact only

Billing

Primary billing axis

One Enterprise plan priced on application, tailored to the connectors needed, the number of people, and the deployment and support. The plan lists its entitlements instead of a price: custom credit allocation, all connectors plus custom ones for internal systems, Customer Intelligence, OM1/OM2 organizational memory, 90 day meeting retention, SSO, custom SLAs, implementation services and a dedicated Customer Success Manager. —

Variable cost

Workload / overage exposure

Low variable cost Medium variable cost

Free tier / trial

Try before you buy

No free tierTrial
No free tier

Buying motion

Self-serve vs sales call

Mixed —

Pricing verified

When this pricing was last checked

Product updates

Newest first, each linked to its source.

Glean

  • · MCP / tool calling / API

    Release 565 adds 57 remote server templates to Glean's MCP server library, among them Google Ads, 6sense, BambooHR, Kong Konnect, LinkedIn Hiring Pro, NetSuite QuickStart and Pipefy.

    Source
  • · Agent capability

    Glean release 563 adds Skill reflection, which picks out the feedback users give in chat while running a Skill and proposes it as an edit to the Skill's instructions.

    Source
  • · Human approval / guardrails

    Glean's MCP servers now ask the user to confirm before any write action runs, on by default, because not every MCP host has its own approval step.

    Source

Other matchups in enterprise operations agents

Not the pairing you were after? These compare a different set of enterprise operations agents on the same 14 capabilities.

See all 230 enterprise operations agents comparisons

Contact us

Found a vendor we missed? Have feedback on the index? We'd love to hear from you.