Agentic Index
Auditoria vs Lunos (2026)
Auditoria and Lunos overlap on accounts receivable automation, and the split is suite versus specialist: Auditoria covers AP, AR, and finance research inside your ERP as a contact sales enterprise buy, while Lunos is a focused multi agent AR suite with three autonomy modes and usage aligned pricing starting free then 0.3 percent on collections. That verdict is the Agentic Index coverage score, graded from each vendor's own published materials.
Choose Auditoria to automate the finance office broadly, Lunos to attack receivables specifically with graduated autonomy.
This comparison is published by Agentic Index, an independent agentic AI vendor research platform. Auditoria and Lunos are each graded against the same 14 capability Agentic Index taxonomy, from the vendor's own public materials under the Agentic Index verification standard, alongside 956 researched vendors. No vendor pays for placement and no vendor has reviewed this page. How this evidence is graded
Choose Auditoria if
- AP and AR together from one vendor inside the ERP is the consolidation you want.
- Enterprise procurement prefers an office of the CFO platform.
- Finance research agents add value beyond transaction automation.
Choose Lunos if
- Receivables are the specific bottleneck, and a specialist beats a suite.
- Free entry with 0.3 percent on collections lets you prove value before spend.
- Autonomy modes and Slack native operations fit your team's trust curve.
| At a glance | Auditoria | Lunos |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Enterprise operations agent | Enterprise operations agent |
| Entry price | Contact for pricing | No base fee; 0.3% of collections (Pay as you go) |
| Free / trial | — | Self serve sign up with no base fee on Pay as you go, charged only on collections for the accounts assigned to Lunos; no free plan is published |
| Pricing confidence | contact only | public exact |
| Feature | A Auditoria |
L Lunos |
|---|---|---|
| Action & orchestration | ||
|
Integrations & Tool Calling Ability to connect agents to real systems through native integrations, OAuth-authenticated actions, custom tools, APIs, webhooks, or MCP-compatible tools. |
Full / Explicit | Full / Explicit |
|
Workflow Orchestration Ability to sequence, branch, retry, route, and combine deterministic workflow nodes with autonomous agent steps. |
Full / Explicit | Full / Explicit |
|
Triggers & Channel Coverage How agents wake up and where they work: schedules, webhooks, message events, CRM events, inbox events, chat, email, voice, and collaboration tools. |
Full / Explicit | Full / Explicit |
| Knowledge & context | ||
|
Knowledge Grounding & RAG Ability to ground agent behavior in company data through document ingestion, retrieval, external knowledge APIs, semantic search, or RAG layers. |
Full / Explicit | Partial |
|
Memory & State Persistence Ability to persist context across a run, conversation, workflow, user, team, or longer-term memory layer. |
No / Not documented | No / Not documented |
| Control & trust | ||
|
Human Oversight & Guardrails Approval steps, consent checkpoints, escalation rules, structured guardrails, policy constraints, and pause/resume controls. |
Full / Explicit | Full / Explicit |
|
Security, Identity & Governance RBAC, SSO, auditability, encryption, least-privilege tool access, compliance posture, and data handling policy. |
Full / Explicit | Full / Explicit |
|
Observability & Auditability Traces, logs, execution histories, metrics, audit events, and debugging detail for production agent behavior. |
Full / Explicit | Partial |
|
Deployment & Data Residency Deployment modes and options, including SaaS, dedicated cloud, VPC, on-prem, hybrid, local runtime, and self-hosting. |
Full / Explicit | Unknown / Unspecified |
| Solution readiness | ||
|
Prebuilt Agents, Templates & Packs Ready-made workflows, packaged employees, templates, blueprints, industry solutions, and role-specific agents that reduce time-to-value. |
Full / Explicit | Full / Explicit |
| Platform extensibility | ||
|
Model Flexibility & Routing Ability to work across multiple foundation models, route tasks to different models, or let buyers bring their own providers and keys. |
Partial | No / Not documented |
|
APIs, SDKs & MCP Extensibility Composability layer: stable APIs, SDKs, MCP tool consumption/serving, custom tools, and integration into internal systems. |
Partial | No / Not documented |
|
Testing, Debugging & Optimization Testing, debugging, scoring, retries, fallbacks, quality gates, and optimization loops for improving agent workflows before and after deployment. |
Partial | No / Not documented |
| Specialist automation | ||
|
Browser & Computer Use Browser, desktop, or remote/local computer control for workflows that cannot be handled through stable APIs alone. |
No / Not documented | Partial |
Pricing snapshot
Sourced from the Index pricing dataset · open each vendor's profile for full detail.
| Pricing | A Auditoria |
L Lunos |
|---|---|---|
|
Entry price Lowest public entry point |
Contact for pricing | No base fee; 0.3% of collections (Pay as you go) |
|
Pricing confidence How public the numbers are |
Contact only | Public, exact |
|
Billing Primary billing axis |
— | percentage of collections on the entry plan, flat annual fee banded by collections volume above it |
|
Variable cost Workload / overage exposure |
Low variable cost | Medium variable cost |
|
Free tier / trial Try before you buy |
No free tier
|
No free tier
|
|
Buying motion Self-serve vs sales call |
Sales call | Mixed |
More comparisons with Auditoria or Lunos
Other matchups in enterprise operations agents
Not the pairing you were after? These compare a different set of enterprise operations agents on the same 14 capabilities.