ReliaQuest
Also known as: GreyMatter, ReliaQuest GreyMatter, Agentic Memory
Agentic security operations platform unifying detection, containment, investigation and response across existing tools, with customer controlled Agentic Memory, RAG grounded responses and 200 plus agent skills across 1,300 customer environments.
ReliaQuest GreyMatter is an agentic security operations platform that unifies detection, containment, investigation and response across a customer's existing stack rather than replacing it, extending into attack surface management, digital risk protection, data pipeline management and phishing analysis under one architecture. It reports threat containment in under five minutes, more than 100 patents, 94 percent customer retention and operating experience drawn from over 1,300 real customer environments.
Its agentic design is more precisely described than most. Rather than standalone agents each performing one task, GreyMatter treats task agents as skills within larger agentic systems that function as personas, reasoning across alerts, detections, hunts, threat intelligence and exposures using more than 200 agent skills and 400 AI tools to reach a defined result. The AI is built and maintained by current and former SOC operators including detection engineers, threat hunters and incident responders.
Three governance mechanisms stand out. Agentic Memory is customer controlled: analysts add guidelines and tribal knowledge that shape the AI's behaviour, and those guidelines can be viewed, edited and managed directly, so environmental context and team convention persist rather than being re explained. Hallucination risk is addressed through retrieval augmented generation grounding every response in historical security data. And accuracy is not merely asserted, with 99.4 percent investigation accuracy validated through what the company calls a seven standard lifecycle, alongside human quality control and feedback loops.
Commercially it positions against two different rivals at once: against platformisation vendors on technology agnosticism, arguing that closed ecosystems give non native tools shallower detection and response coverage, and against managed security service providers on ownership, arguing the customer's team is scaled rather than replaced. Certification is comprehensive, with SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001, PCI DSS and HIPAA in place and FedRAMP in process. Pricing is custom, multi year and gated behind a quote.
Vendor details
Canonical URL
https://reliaquest.com
Category
Security / SOC agent
Company status
independent
Use cases & customers
Target customers
Deployment options
In practice
You have an internal SOC and want it scaled rather than outsourced. GreyMatter is positioned explicitly against MSSPs on ownership, automating investigation and containment while your team keeps control.
Your stack is multi vendor and every consolidation pitch penalises the tools you did not buy from them. The technology agnostic architecture is the counter argument to platformisation, where non native tools get shallower coverage.
Your analysts keep re explaining environmental context to the AI. Agentic Memory lets them write guidelines and tribal knowledge that persist and shape agent behaviour, and those guidelines stay customer editable.
Sources & related URLs
Agentic Index coverage score
10.5 / 14 capabilities · 75%
| Integrations & Tool CallingTechnology agnostic by design, unifying a customer's existing SIEM, EDR and wider stack rather than requiring native tooling, with more than 400 AI tools available to the agentic systems. Positioned explicitly against closed ecosystems that give non native tools shallower detection and response coverage. 2026-08-05 | Full |
|---|---|
| Workflow OrchestrationCovers the full detection, containment, investigation and response lifecycle plus attack surface management, digital risk protection, data pipeline management and phishing analysis in one architecture, with task agents composed as skills inside larger agentic systems that reason to a defined result. Containment reported in under five minutes. 2026-08-05 | Full |
| Knowledge Grounding & RAGHallucination risk is explicitly mitigated through retrieval augmented generation grounding every AI response in historical security data, supported by operating insight from more than 1,300 real customer environments. Naming hallucination mitigation as the purpose of the grounding layer matches the anvilogic pattern and is rare elsewhere. 2026-08-05 | Full |
| Human Oversight & GuardrailsHuman in the loop governance is named as a design principle, with guardrails, human quality assurance and control, and feedback loops that improve accuracy over time. AI behaviour is continuously guided by current and former SOC operators, and customers can directly edit the guidelines that constrain agent behaviour. 2026-08-05 | Full |
| Security, Identity & GovernanceSOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001, PCI DSS and HIPAA certifications with FedRAMP in process, published first party alongside more than 100 patents and 94 percent customer retention. A complete posture for a security operations vendor, in contrast to the pattern of security vendors under documenting their own controls. 2026-08-05 | Full |
| Observability & AuditabilityCustomers can view and manage the AI guidelines governing agent behaviour, which is real transparency into why an agent acted, and investigation accuracy is measured and published, but no per action audit trail or shared investigation record comparable to command-zero's is documented. 2026-08-05 | Partial |
| Memory & State PersistenceThe most explicit customer controlled agent memory found in this sweep: Agentic Memory lets analysts add guidelines and tribal knowledge that shape AI behaviour, and those guidelines can be viewed, edited and managed directly by the customer, so environmental context persists rather than being re explained each investigation. 2026-08-05 | Full |
| Deployment & Data ResidencyDeploys as an overlay on the customer's existing SIEM and EDR rather than requiring rip and replace, so primary security data stays in the customer's own tools, but independent reviewers note it introduces a proprietary console layer and no self hosted or regional residency option is documented. FedRAMP in process signals a future public sector deployment path. 2026-08-05 | Partial |
| Prebuilt Agents, Templates & PacksShips more than 200 agent skills and 400 AI tools composed into prebuilt agentic personas, backed by detection content and operational patterns derived from over 1,300 customer environments. 2026-08-05 | Full |
| Triggers & Channel CoverageAgentic systems reason across alerts, detections, hunts, threat intelligence and exposures, so work originates from five distinct signal classes rather than from alert queues alone. 2026-08-05 | Full |
| Model Flexibility & RoutingNo model list, routing policy, customer facing model selection or bring your own key capability is documented. The AI stack is proprietary and shaped by ReliaQuest's own operators rather than configurable by the customer at model level. 2026-08-05 | Unable to verify |
| APIs, SDKs & MCP ExtensibilityMore than 400 AI tools and broad third party tool integration provide reach, and customers extend agent behaviour through editable Agentic Memory guidelines, but no public API, SDK or MCP surface is documented. 2026-08-05 | Partial |
| Testing, Debugging & OptimizationInvestigation accuracy of 99.4 percent is validated through a named seven standard lifecycle rather than asserted, and accuracy is maintained through human quality assurance and control plus feedback loops that improve behaviour over time. A documented validation methodology is rare across this index. 2026-08-05 | Full |
| Browser & Computer UseNo browser control or computer use capability. Containment and response actions run through integrations with security tooling rather than by operating consoles, which the company contrasts with platforms requiring analysts to log into individual tools. 2026-08-05 | Unable to verify |
The Agentic Index coverage score grades every vendor Full, Partial or Unable to verify against the same 14 buyer facing capabilities, from public evidence only. Each capability links to how all vendors in the index score on it. How this evidence is graded
Pricing
Not published; custom enterprise pricing, multi year terms, gated quotes
not disclosed; custom enterprise scope
What is public
Nothing on price. Certification, patent count, retention rate, accuracy validation and architecture detail are all published first party.
Billing mechanics
Custom enterprise pricing on multi year contracts with gated quotes, per independent platform comparisons. No public plan tiers or rate card exists, and there is no self serve path.
Cost watchouts
Multi year commitment is the norm rather than the exception, and the platform introduces a proprietary console layer alongside the customer's existing tools, so tooling is added rather than consolidated
Variable cost rationale
With no disclosed unit the exposure cannot be modelled, though an overlay model that leaves data in the customer's existing SIEM avoids the ingestion based cost escalation that drives spend in SIEM native alternatives.
Additional watchouts
Multi year gated quotes mean no benchmarking before engaging and limited exit optionality, which sits awkwardly against the vendor's own anti lock in argument. Verify what happens to Agentic Memory guidelines and accumulated context at contract end, since that is the asset a customer builds up inside the platform.
Sales call required
Yes, required for paid access
Free / trial
No free tier or self serve trial; evaluation runs through an enterprise sales process
Commercial notes
The commercial positioning is deliberately dual. Against platformisation vendors it argues technology agnosticism, that a closed ecosystem degrades coverage for every tool you did not buy from that vendor. Against managed security service providers it argues ownership, that the customer's own team is scaled rather than replaced. Both arguments are aimed at large enterprises with existing SOC teams and existing multi vendor investment, which is also the segment where multi year commitments are normal. 94 percent customer retention is the number the company leads with commercially.
Key ambiguities
No rate, billing unit or tier structure is published. Whether cost scales with data volume, endpoints, connected tools or analyst seats is undisclosed, and independent reviewers describe quotes as gated.
Missing data
Rates, billing unit, contract minimums, and whether the attack surface management, digital risk protection and phishing analysis modules carry separate cost.
Related vendors
- 7AI — Swarming agentic SOC from the Cybereason founders: sixty plus domain…
- Abnormal AI — Behavioural AI email security with three named autonomous agents: a…
- AirMDR — AI-native MDR built around a Virtual Analyst that triages 95% of…
- Airrived — Agentic OS that unifies SOC, GRC, IAM, vulnerability management, IT,…
- Andesite — Bionic SOC: a human-AI collaboration platform that automates triage,…
- Anvilogic — Agentic security operations platform that decouples detection from…
Alternatives to ReliaQuest
The closest documented capability profiles to ReliaQuest among security and SOC agents tracked by Agentic Index, ordered by similarity on the same 14 point evidence the rankings use. No vendor pays for placement.
- depthfirst11.0 / 14Fuller documented coverage on Observability & Auditability
- Simbian9.5 / 14A lighter documented profile than ReliaQuest
- Command Zero11.0 / 14Fuller documented coverage on Observability & Auditability and APIs, SDKs & MCP Extensibility
- Seemplicity10.0 / 14Fuller documented coverage on Observability & Auditability
- ZEST Security9.0 / 14A lighter documented profile than ReliaQuest
- Anvilogic9.5 / 14Fuller documented coverage on Deployment & Data Residency
Similarity is computed from each vendor's Agentic Index coverage score evidence, axis by axis, not from the totals. How this evidence is graded