Letta
Memory-first stateful agent platform with an open-source runtime, persistent agents, context repositories for knowledge grounding, model-agnostic support, and a cloud-hosted path for AI developers.
Letta is an open-source platform for building stateful AI agents, agents that remember across sessions, learn continuously, and improve themselves over time. It grew directly out of MemGPT, an influential research project from UC Berkeley that proposed treating a language model like an operating system: if the context window is limited, like a computer's RAM, then the model should be able to page information in and out and decide for itself what is worth keeping close at hand. Letta turns that idea into a general agent framework where persistence is the default rather than something bolted on afterward.
The heart of Letta is its tiered memory. Core memory is a small block that always lives in the context window, holding what the agent knows about the user and about itself, and the agent edits it directly using tools as it learns. Recall memory holds the searchable conversation history just outside the context window, and archival memory is long-term storage the agent queries when it needs older or larger knowledge. Crucially, the agent is an active manager of its own memory: it decides, through tool calls, what to keep in context, what to push to recall, and what to archive, rather than passively receiving whatever an external pipeline injects.
Letta is a full agent runtime, not just a memory layer. It manages the agent loop, tool execution, and state, persisting everything in a database so an agent runs as a long-lived service you can address rather than an object you rebuild on every request. It supports multi-agent setups where agents call sub-agents and share memory blocks, and it is model-agnostic across providers and local models, with Python and TypeScript SDKs and a full API.
More recently Letta has put much of its weight behind Letta Code, a memory-first coding agent that runs in the terminal and accumulates knowledge about a project across sessions, with a desktop app and connectors to chat platforms. Throughout, Letta's bet is the same: that durable, self-managed memory is what separates a long-running, genuinely useful agent from a stateless chatbot.
Vendor details
Canonical URL
https://www.letta.com
Category
Agent infrastructure
Company status
independent
Use cases & customers
Target customers
Deployment options
In practice
Your assistant forgets everything between sessions and users have to re-explain themselves each time. Letta gives the agent persistent, self-managed memory, so it remembers who the user is and what was decided weeks ago, across conversations.
You want an agent that runs for weeks and genuinely learns, not a fresh chatbot each request. Letta runs agents as long-lived services that edit their own memory, persisting state in a database rather than rebuilding context every turn.
Your coding agent re-learns the same project from scratch every session. Letta Code is a memory-first terminal agent that accumulates knowledge about your codebase over time, carrying project context forward instead of starting cold.
Sources & related URLs
Agentic Index coverage score
10.0 / 14 capabilities · 71%
| Integrations & Tool CallingOfficial docs 2026-06-08 | Full |
|---|---|
| Workflow OrchestrationMulti-agent runtime docs 2026-06-08 | Full |
| Knowledge Grounding & RAGContext repositories blog 2026-06-08 | Full |
| Human Oversight & GuardrailsOfficial docs 2026-06-08 | Partial |
| Security, Identity & GovernanceOfficial docs 2026-06-08 | Partial |
| Observability & AuditabilityOfficial docs 2026-06-08 | Partial |
| Memory & State PersistenceMemory-first architecture docs 2026-06-08 | Full |
| Deployment & Data ResidencySelf-hosted and cloud docs 2026-06-08 | Full |
| Prebuilt Agents, Templates & PacksOfficial docs 2026-06-08 | Partial |
| Triggers & Channel CoverageOfficial docs 2026-06-08 | Partial |
| Model Flexibility & RoutingModel-agnostic docs 2026-06-08 | Full |
| APIs, SDKs & MCP ExtensibilityOfficial docs 2026-06-08 | Full |
| Testing, Debugging & OptimizationOfficial docs 2026-06-08 | Partial |
| Browser & Computer UseOfficial docs 2026-06-08 | Unable to verify |
The Agentic Index coverage score grades every vendor Full, Partial or Unable to verify against the same 14 buyer facing capabilities, from public evidence only. Each capability links to how all vendors in the index score on it. How this evidence is graded
Recent platform changes
Letta released the open-source trajectory package, which normalizes coding-agent sessions from Claude Code, Codex, and Letta Code into a single JSON-compatible format. The schema captures user messages, agent reasoning, and tool results while stripping redundant payloads to reduce token usage by up to fivefold.
Bears on: Memory / state
View sourcePricing
Free tier · Pro $20/mo · usage based API · open source self host
usage
Included quota
Free API tier: 5K monthly credits, 2 agent templates, 1 GB storage. Paid API tier: 20K monthly credits with pay as you go overage, unlimited agents, 10 GB storage. Personal Pro: 20 stateful agents plus Letta Auto inference quota. Credits meter LLM inference and CPU; the LLM gateway passes through provider pricing without markup.
What is public
Letta publishes free and paid tiers for both personal use (Pro $20/mo) and the API platform (usage based credits with published tool execution rates), plus a fully free Apache 2.0 self host path with BYOK.
Billing mechanics
Credit based: model requests and CPU cycles deduct from monthly plan credits, with pay as you go overage and auto top up. BYOK and external coding plan connections bypass Letta inference billing entirely.
Cost watchouts
Personal plan quotas are for hands on individual use only, not automated workloads; automated traffic belongs on the usage based API plan. Heavy coding agent use drains quota fast: Letta's own docs note casual coders run ~$100/mo+ in usage and power users exceed $200/mo. Server side tool execution bills CPU time separately.
Variable cost rationale
Credits meter inference and CPU directly, so cost tracks agent activity and model choice; identical subscriptions produce very different effective capacity.
Additional watchouts
Evaluate against the coding agent pivot: the stateful agent API remains live, but product momentum is visibly concentrated in Letta Code.
Sales call required
Mixed (some tiers require a call)
Free / trial
Free account, no card (up to 3 agents with managed state; BYOK unlimited locally)
Lowest paid plan
Pro $20/mo (personal use; Letta Auto model quota with pay as you go overage)
Commercial notes
Born from the UC Berkeley MemGPT research project; $10M seed. Since December 2025 the company's center of gravity has shifted to Letta Code, its memory first coding agent (desktop app April 2026, Channels May 2026). Buyers evaluating Letta as pure memory/state infrastructure should confirm roadmap emphasis.
Key ambiguities
Team and Enterprise per seat pricing unpublished. Credit consumption rates vary by model tier and Max Mode context settings, so effective cost per agent interaction is workload dependent.
Missing data
Team and Enterprise pricing unpublished.
Related vendors
- Acrab — Singapore compute infrastructure company building a full stack…
- AgentOps — Agent observability and reliability platform with broad model and…
- Agno — High-performance agent runtime and framework (formerly Phidata) with…
- AIsa — Unified resource and payment gateway for AI agents that lets them…
- AlphaBitCore — AI control plane that governs how models, agents, tools, and…
- Anchor Browser — Cloud hosted browser infrastructure that lets AI agents operate real…
Alternatives to Letta
The closest documented capability profiles to Letta among agent infrastructure platforms tracked by Agentic Index, ordered by similarity on the same 14 point evidence the rankings use. No vendor pays for placement.
- Haystack9.5 / 14A lighter documented profile than Letta
- LlamaIndex9.0 / 14A lighter documented profile than Letta
- LangChain11.5 / 14Fuller documented coverage on Human Oversight & Guardrails and Observability & Auditability
- xpander.ai10.5 / 14Adds documented Browser & Computer Use
- Pipecat10.0 / 14Fuller documented coverage on Observability & Auditability and Triggers & Channel Coverage
- Agno12.5 / 14Adds documented Browser & Computer UseLetta vs Agno →
Similarity is computed from each vendor's Agentic Index coverage score evidence, axis by axis, not from the totals. How this evidence is graded