Agentic Index
Lindy vs Relevance AI (2026)
Lindy and Relevance AI compete head on for the no code AI workforce, and each names the other in its marketing: Lindy sells plain language AI employees at flat tiers from 49.99 dollars a month with usage multipliers, while Relevance AI sells an agent workforce platform with a template marketplace on a dual meter (Pro at 19 dollars a month billed annually, with bring your own model keys on every plan). That verdict is the Agentic Index coverage score, graded from each vendor's own published materials.
Lindy is simpler to start; Relevance is more transparent and controllable at scale.
This comparison is published by Agentic Index, an independent agentic AI vendor research platform. Lindy and Relevance AI are each graded against the same 14 capability Agentic Index taxonomy, from the vendor's own public materials under the Agentic Index verification standard, alongside 956 researched vendors. No vendor pays for placement and no vendor has reviewed this page. How this evidence is graded
Choose Lindy if
- Plain language setup with the least configuration is the priority.
- Email, scheduling, and CRM assistant work is your core use case.
- Flat monthly tiers feel simpler than metering two consumption units.
Choose Relevance AI if
- Transparent usage pricing, with published top ups for actions and credits, fits your cost discipline.
- Bring your own API keys is your cost control lever.
- A template marketplace covering sales and ops use cases gives you a head start.
| At a glance | Lindy | Relevance AI |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Agent builder | Multi-agent platform |
| Entry price | From $30/user/mo | Pro $19/mo annual ($29 monthly) |
| Free / trial | 7-day trial | None (Free plan retired) |
| Pricing confidence | public exact | public partial |
| Feature | L Lindy |
R Relevance AI |
|---|---|---|
| Action & orchestration | ||
|
Integrations & Tool Calling Ability to connect agents to real systems through native integrations, OAuth-authenticated actions, custom tools, APIs, webhooks, or MCP-compatible tools. |
Full / Explicit
Connections span Gmail, Slack, Notion, HubSpot and 1,000+ tools plus any hosted MCP server, with a credentials vault, per-integration guardrails, an HTTP Request skill for anything uncatalogued and 500+ actions from a Pipedream partnership, though legacy material claims 3,000+ integrations. |
Full / Explicit |
|
Workflow Orchestration Ability to sequence, branch, retry, route, and combine deterministic workflow nodes with autonomous agent steps. |
Partial
One agent plans and runs multi-step work across tools, with Routines and skills, but no branching, conditions, multiple agents or flow surface the customer configures is documented. |
Full / Explicit |
|
Triggers & Channel Coverage How agents wake up and where they work: schedules, webhooks, message events, CRM events, inbox events, chat, email, voice, and collaboration tools. |
Full / Explicit
Schedules through Routines, events such as a meeting ending or an unanswered email, and channels across Slack, iMessage and SMS, Gmail and the major meeting platforms are all included on every plan. |
Full / Explicit |
| Knowledge & context | ||
|
Knowledge Grounding & RAG Ability to ground agent behavior in company data through document ingestion, retrieval, external knowledge APIs, semantic search, or RAG layers. |
Full / Explicit
Recorded meetings filed into a searchable library of shareable folders give a maintained knowledge store, while answers across Slack history and connected tools come back with the underlying file or decision attached. |
Full / Explicit |
|
Memory & State Persistence Ability to persist context across a run, conversation, workflow, user, team, or longer-term memory layer. |
Full / Explicit
Memory is a versioned plain-file system the customer can open, read and edit like a document, scoped personal or workspace, and skills keep demonstrated procedures for reuse across the team. |
Full / Explicit |
| Control & trust | ||
|
Human Oversight & Guardrails Approval steps, consent checkpoints, escalation rules, structured guardrails, policy constraints, and pause/resume controls. |
Full / Explicit
Anything with outside impact, such as sending an email or updating a ticket, waits for a named approver on every plan while read-only lookups from approved sources proceed, with per-integration guardrails and permissions the customer sets and revokes. |
Full / Explicit |
|
Security, Identity & Governance RBAC, SSO, auditability, encryption, least-privilege tool access, compliance posture, and data handling policy. |
Full / Explicit
SOC 2 Type II audited by Johanson Group with a Drata trust center that releases reports on request, per-integration permissions and encryption on every plan, and SSO and SCIM on Enterprise only. |
Full / Explicit |
|
Observability & Auditability Traces, logs, execution histories, metrics, audit events, and debugging detail for production agent behavior. |
Partial
Team files carry version history and the meeting library is searchable, but no logging, tracing or audit page is documented for the current product, and a per-run task view appears only in legacy builder documentation. |
Full / Explicit |
|
Deployment & Data Residency Deployment modes and options, including SaaS, dedicated cloud, VPC, on-prem, hybrid, local runtime, and self-hosting. |
No / Not documented
The security page says residency requirements are supported, but no region, selection control, VPC, on-premises, self-hosted or dedicated option is documented, so the product is managed SaaS only. |
Full / Explicit |
| Solution readiness | ||
|
Prebuilt Agents, Templates & Packs Ready-made workflows, packaged employees, templates, blueprints, industry solutions, and role-specific agents that reduce time-to-value. |
Full / Explicit
The product ships 40+ skills on every plan that the agent picks up on its own, and customers add their own by showing Lindy a task once, after which it is saved for the whole team. |
Full / Explicit |
| Platform extensibility | ||
|
Model Flexibility & Routing Ability to work across multiple foundation models, route tasks to different models, or let buyers bring their own providers and keys. |
Full / Explicit
The customer picks a model per task from a multi-provider roster, with model selection listed as included on every plan and the changelog recording models added over time, such as Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite for phone calls. |
Full / Explicit |
|
APIs, SDKs & MCP Extensibility Composability layer: stable APIs, SDKs, MCP tool consumption/serving, custom tools, and integration into internal systems. |
Partial
The webhook trigger takes bearer-token authenticated calls with a callback response and an HTTP Request skill calls outside APIs, but no SDK, client library or Lindy-published MCP server is documented, and the OpenAPI specification listed in the documentation index could not be read. |
Full / Explicit |
|
Testing, Debugging & Optimization Testing, debugging, scoring, retries, fallbacks, quality gates, and optimization loops for improving agent workflows before and after deployment. |
No / Not documented
Neither the documentation index nor the pricing page's included capabilities list any test, preview, sandbox, evaluation or benchmarking surface, and routines and skills take effect directly with no documented dry run. |
Full / Explicit |
| Specialist automation | ||
|
Browser & Computer Use Browser, desktop, or remote/local computer control for workflows that cannot be handled through stable APIs alone. |
Full / Explicit
Computer use is included on every plan: the vendor introduced it as Autopilot, giving the agent its own cloud computer to do what the user could when a tool is not otherwise reachable. |
No / Not documented |
Pricing snapshot
Sourced from the Index pricing dataset · open each vendor's profile for full detail.
| Pricing | L Lindy |
R Relevance AI |
|---|---|---|
|
Entry price Lowest public entry point |
From $30/user/mo | Pro $19/mo annual ($29 monthly) |
|
Pricing confidence How public the numbers are |
Public, exact | Public, partial |
|
Billing Primary billing axis |
seats + shared credit pool | actions + vendor credits |
|
Variable cost Workload / overage exposure |
High variable cost | High variable cost |
|
Free tier / trial Try before you buy |
No free tierTrial
|
No free tier
|
|
Buying motion Self-serve vs sales call |
Self-serve | Self-serve |
More comparisons with Lindy or Relevance AI
Other matchups in agent builders
Not the pairing you were after? These compare a different set of agent builders on the same 14 capabilities.