Agentic Index

Clio vs Harvey (2026)

Both vendors last verified

The price gap leads. That verdict is the Agentic Index coverage score, graded from each vendor's own published materials.

Clio starts at $49 per user a month, and Harvey sells on enterprise contracts with no public rate card. They serve different firms doing different work. Clio is legal practice management with agentic workflows on top, built for the small and midsize firms that make up most of the profession. Harvey is an enterprise legal AI platform with a hundred thousand document Vault, workflows and an agent builder, used across most of the AmLaw 100. Almost nobody is genuinely deciding between these two, and the price gap tells you which buyer each one serves.

This comparison is published by Agentic Index, an independent agentic AI vendor research platform. Clio and Harvey are each graded against the same 14 capability Agentic Index taxonomy, from the vendor's own public materials under the Agentic Index verification standard, alongside 1,084 researched vendors. No vendor pays for placement and no vendor has reviewed this page. How this evidence is graded

Choose Clio if

  • You are a small or midsize firm and running the practice is the problem you actually have.
  • A public per user price fits how your firm budgets.
  • You need billing, deadlines and client updates handled, not large scale document analysis.

Choose Harvey if

  • Document volume is the work, and a Vault that reviews 100,000 files at once is a capability rather than a spec sheet line.
  • You are building repeatable workflows and want an agent builder inside the legal platform.
  • Peer adoption across the AmLaw 100 lowers the risk of the decision inside a large firm.
Feature
C
Clio
H
Harvey
Action & orchestration

Integrations & Tool Calling

Ability to connect agents to real systems through native integrations, OAuth-authenticated actions, custom tools, APIs, webhooks, or MCP-compatible tools.

Workflow Orchestration

Ability to sequence, branch, retry, route, and combine deterministic workflow nodes with autonomous agent steps.

Triggers & Channel Coverage

How agents wake up and where they work: schedules, webhooks, message events, CRM events, inbox events, chat, email, voice, and collaboration tools.

Knowledge & context

Knowledge Grounding & RAG

Ability to ground agent behavior in company data through document ingestion, retrieval, external knowledge APIs, semantic search, or RAG layers.

Memory & State Persistence

Ability to persist context across a run, conversation, workflow, user, team, or longer-term memory layer.

Control & trust

Human Oversight & Guardrails

Approval steps, consent checkpoints, escalation rules, structured guardrails, policy constraints, and pause/resume controls.

Security, Identity & Governance

RBAC, SSO, auditability, encryption, least-privilege tool access, compliance posture, and data handling policy.

Observability & Auditability

Traces, logs, execution histories, metrics, audit events, and debugging detail for production agent behavior.

Deployment & Data Residency

Deployment modes and options, including SaaS, dedicated cloud, VPC, on-prem, hybrid, local runtime, and self-hosting.

Solution readiness

Prebuilt Agents, Templates & Packs

Ready-made workflows, packaged employees, templates, blueprints, industry solutions, and role-specific agents that reduce time-to-value.

Platform extensibility

Model Flexibility & Routing

Ability to work across multiple foundation models, route tasks to different models, or let buyers bring their own providers and keys.

APIs, SDKs & MCP Extensibility

Composability layer: stable APIs, SDKs, MCP tool consumption/serving, custom tools, and integration into internal systems.

Testing, Debugging & Optimization

Testing, debugging, scoring, retries, fallbacks, quality gates, and optimization loops for improving agent workflows before and after deployment.

Specialist automation

Browser & Computer Use

Browser, desktop, or remote/local computer control for workflows that cannot be handled through stable APIs alone.

Pricing snapshot

Sourced from the Index pricing dataset · open each vendor's profile for full detail.

Pricing
C
Clio
H
Harvey

Entry price

Lowest public entry point

From $49 per user a month on Starter. AI is included on Core and above. Contact for pricing

Pricing confidence

How public the numbers are

Public, partial Contact only

Billing

Primary billing axis

Per user seats on the plan chosen. —

Variable cost

Workload / overage exposure

Low variable cost Low variable cost

Free tier / trial

Try before you buy

No free tierTrial
No free tier

Buying motion

Self-serve vs sales call

Mixed Sales call

Pricing verified

When this pricing was last checked

Product updates

Newest first, each linked to its source.

Clio

  • · Browser/computer use

    Clio Work can now fill in the submission form on a court's own electronic filing portal, using documents and matter details already stored in Clio.

    Source
  • · Agent capability

    Clio launched Visualizations in Clio Work, where a legal professional describes a tool or view, such as a case chronology, a settlement calculator or a firm performance dashboard, and Clio Work picks the relevant data, writes and runs the code and builds it inside the platform.

    Source
  • · Agent capability

    Clio added Canadian case law and legislation to Vincent for research, drafting, analysis and citation verification.

    Source

Harvey

  • · MCP / tool calling / API

    BYO (Custom MCP) lets an organization register its own MCP servers and connect any MCP compatible tool to Harvey.

    Source
  • · Workflow orchestration

    Legal Work Orchestration organizes a matter in Harvey into phases and tasks, each carrying its scope, inputs and reviewer, so agents can execute defined tasks and lawyers review the output at designated gates.

    Source
  • · MCP / tool calling / API

    A new Connector Library in Harvey is a catalog of admin enabled connectors that are either native integrations or vendor run MCP servers its agents call as tools.

    Source

Other matchups in enterprise operations agents

Not the pairing you were after? These compare a different set of enterprise operations agents on the same 14 capabilities.

See all 230 enterprise operations agents comparisons

Contact us

Found a vendor we missed? Have feedback on the index? We'd love to hear from you.