Agentic Index
Clio vs Harvey (2026)
The price gap here is the honest headline: Clio from 49 dollars per user a month, Harvey on enterprise contact pricing with no published rate card. That verdict is the Agentic Index coverage score, graded from each vendor's own published materials.
They serve different firms doing different work. Clio is legal practice management with agentic workflows on top, built for the small and midsize firms that make up most of the profession. Harvey is an enterprise legal AI platform with a hundred thousand document Vault, workflows and an agent builder, used across most of the AmLaw 100, documenting 12.5 of 14 against Clio's 10.5. Almost nobody is genuinely deciding between these two, and the ones who are should read that price gap as a description of the buyer.
This comparison is published by Agentic Index, an independent agentic AI vendor research platform. Clio and Harvey are each graded against the same 14 capability Agentic Index taxonomy, from the vendor's own public materials under the Agentic Index verification standard, alongside 969 researched vendors. No vendor pays for placement and no vendor has reviewed this page. How this evidence is graded
Choose Clio if
- You are a small or midsize firm and running the practice is the problem you actually have.
- Budget reality: this is a two figure per user decision, not a four figure one.
- You need billing, deadlines and client updates handled, not large scale document analysis.
Choose Harvey if
- Document volume is the work: a hundred thousand document Vault is a capability, not a spec sheet line.
- You are building repeatable workflows and want an agent builder inside the legal platform.
- Peer adoption across the AmLaw 100 lowers the risk of the decision inside a large firm.
| At a glance | Clio | Harvey |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Enterprise operations agent | Enterprise operations agent |
| Entry price | From $49/user/mo (Starter); AI included on Core and above | Contact for pricing |
| Free / trial | Free trial on Starter through Signature; no free tier | No trial or free tier published; request a demo |
| Pricing confidence | public partial | contact only |
| Feature | C Clio |
H Harvey |
|---|---|---|
| Action & orchestration | ||
|
Integrations & Tool Calling Ability to connect agents to real systems through native integrations, OAuth-authenticated actions, custom tools, APIs, webhooks, or MCP-compatible tools. |
Full / Explicit | Full / Explicit |
|
Workflow Orchestration Ability to sequence, branch, retry, route, and combine deterministic workflow nodes with autonomous agent steps. |
Full / Explicit | Full / Explicit |
|
Triggers & Channel Coverage How agents wake up and where they work: schedules, webhooks, message events, CRM events, inbox events, chat, email, voice, and collaboration tools. |
Full / Explicit | Full / Explicit |
| Knowledge & context | ||
|
Knowledge Grounding & RAG Ability to ground agent behavior in company data through document ingestion, retrieval, external knowledge APIs, semantic search, or RAG layers. |
Full / Explicit | Full / Explicit |
|
Memory & State Persistence Ability to persist context across a run, conversation, workflow, user, team, or longer-term memory layer. |
Partial | Full / Explicit |
| Control & trust | ||
|
Human Oversight & Guardrails Approval steps, consent checkpoints, escalation rules, structured guardrails, policy constraints, and pause/resume controls. |
Full / Explicit | Full / Explicit |
|
Security, Identity & Governance RBAC, SSO, auditability, encryption, least-privilege tool access, compliance posture, and data handling policy. |
Full / Explicit | Full / Explicit |
|
Observability & Auditability Traces, logs, execution histories, metrics, audit events, and debugging detail for production agent behavior. |
Full / Explicit | Full / Explicit |
|
Deployment & Data Residency Deployment modes and options, including SaaS, dedicated cloud, VPC, on-prem, hybrid, local runtime, and self-hosting. |
Full / Explicit | Full / Explicit |
| Solution readiness | ||
|
Prebuilt Agents, Templates & Packs Ready-made workflows, packaged employees, templates, blueprints, industry solutions, and role-specific agents that reduce time-to-value. |
Full / Explicit | Full / Explicit |
| Platform extensibility | ||
|
Model Flexibility & Routing Ability to work across multiple foundation models, route tasks to different models, or let buyers bring their own providers and keys. |
No / Not documented | Full / Explicit |
|
APIs, SDKs & MCP Extensibility Composability layer: stable APIs, SDKs, MCP tool consumption/serving, custom tools, and integration into internal systems. |
Full / Explicit | Full / Explicit |
|
Testing, Debugging & Optimization Testing, debugging, scoring, retries, fallbacks, quality gates, and optimization loops for improving agent workflows before and after deployment. |
No / Not documented | Partial |
| Specialist automation | ||
|
Browser & Computer Use Browser, desktop, or remote/local computer control for workflows that cannot be handled through stable APIs alone. |
No / Not documented | No / Not documented |
Pricing snapshot
Sourced from the Index pricing dataset · open each vendor's profile for full detail.
| Pricing | C Clio |
H Harvey |
|---|---|---|
|
Entry price Lowest public entry point |
From $49/user/mo (Starter); AI included on Core and above | Contact for pricing |
|
Pricing confidence How public the numbers are |
Public, partial | Contact only |
|
Billing Primary billing axis |
seats | — |
|
Variable cost Workload / overage exposure |
Low variable cost | Low variable cost |
|
Free tier / trial Try before you buy |
No free tierTrial
|
No free tier
|
|
Buying motion Self-serve vs sales call |
Mixed | Sales call |
More comparisons with Clio or Harvey
Other matchups in enterprise operations agents
Not the pairing you were after? These compare a different set of enterprise operations agents on the same 14 capabilities.