Agentic Index
Clio vs Harvey (2026)
The price gap here is the honest headline: Clio from 39 dollars per user a month, Harvey at a thousand.
They serve different firms doing different work. Clio is legal practice management with agentic workflows on top, built for the small and midsize firms that make up most of the profession. Harvey is an enterprise legal AI platform with a hundred thousand document Vault, workflows and an agent builder, used across most of the AmLaw 100, documenting 9.5 of 14 against Clio's 6. Almost nobody is genuinely deciding between these two, and the ones who are should read that price gap as a description of the buyer.
Choose Clio if
- You are a small or midsize firm and running the practice is the problem you actually have.
- Budget reality: this is a two figure per user decision, not a four figure one.
- You need billing, deadlines and client updates handled, not large scale document analysis.
Choose Harvey if
- Document volume is the work: a hundred thousand document Vault is a capability, not a spec sheet line.
- You are building repeatable workflows and want an agent builder inside the legal platform.
- Peer adoption across the AmLaw 100 lowers the risk of the decision inside a large firm.
Vendor data for this comparison is unavailable.
Browse the full vendor directory