Agentic Index

Asteroid vs Island (2026)

Both vendors last verified

Both put governance around browser agents in serious environments. That verdict is the Agentic Index coverage score, graded from each vendor's own published materials.

Island is the enterprise browser as a control plane, running on demand agents under governance, with per agent permissions, human approval gates, real time data loss prevention on MCP data flows, per invocation audit logs to your security systems and model agnostic provider choice. Asteroid supervises browser and computer use in regulated back offices, where a frontier model drives the portal, the agent then compiles its own deterministic script and can discover the private API underneath, graph based and self healing, HIPAA ready with live human supervision. Island governs everything. Asteroid turns the exploration into something repeatable.

This comparison is published by Agentic Index, an independent agentic AI vendor research platform. Asteroid and Island are each graded against the same 14 capability Agentic Index taxonomy, from the vendor's own public materials under the Agentic Index verification standard, alongside 1,084 researched vendors. No vendor pays for placement and no vendor has reviewed this page. How this evidence is graded

Choose Asteroid if

  • Compiling exploration into a deterministic script is the reliability mechanism you want.
  • Discovering the private API underneath is a genuinely different and more durable outcome.
  • Live human supervision on regulated back office work is your operating model.

Choose Island if

  • The enterprise browser already governs your people's browsing, and agents join the same controls.
  • Data loss prevention on MCP flows and per invocation audit logs are security requirements.
  • Model agnostic provider choice at the browser layer keeps your options open.
Feature
A
Asteroid
I
Island
Action & orchestration

Integrations & Tool Calling

Ability to connect agents to real systems through native integrations, OAuth-authenticated actions, custom tools, APIs, webhooks, or MCP-compatible tools.

Workflow Orchestration

Ability to sequence, branch, retry, route, and combine deterministic workflow nodes with autonomous agent steps.

Triggers & Channel Coverage

How agents wake up and where they work: schedules, webhooks, message events, CRM events, inbox events, chat, email, voice, and collaboration tools.

Knowledge & context

Knowledge Grounding & RAG

Ability to ground agent behavior in company data through document ingestion, retrieval, external knowledge APIs, semantic search, or RAG layers.

Memory & State Persistence

Ability to persist context across a run, conversation, workflow, user, team, or longer-term memory layer.

Control & trust

Human Oversight & Guardrails

Approval steps, consent checkpoints, escalation rules, structured guardrails, policy constraints, and pause/resume controls.

Security, Identity & Governance

RBAC, SSO, auditability, encryption, least-privilege tool access, compliance posture, and data handling policy.

Observability & Auditability

Traces, logs, execution histories, metrics, audit events, and debugging detail for production agent behavior.

Deployment & Data Residency

Deployment modes and options, including SaaS, dedicated cloud, VPC, on-prem, hybrid, local runtime, and self-hosting.

Solution readiness

Prebuilt Agents, Templates & Packs

Ready-made workflows, packaged employees, templates, blueprints, industry solutions, and role-specific agents that reduce time-to-value.

Platform extensibility

Model Flexibility & Routing

Ability to work across multiple foundation models, route tasks to different models, or let buyers bring their own providers and keys.

APIs, SDKs & MCP Extensibility

Composability layer: stable APIs, SDKs, MCP tool consumption/serving, custom tools, and integration into internal systems.

Testing, Debugging & Optimization

Testing, debugging, scoring, retries, fallbacks, quality gates, and optimization loops for improving agent workflows before and after deployment.

Specialist automation

Browser & Computer Use

Browser, desktop, or remote/local computer control for workflows that cannot be handled through stable APIs alone.

Pricing snapshot

Sourced from the Index pricing dataset · open each vendor's profile for full detail.

Pricing
A
Asteroid
I
Island

Entry price

Lowest public entry point

Individual is free to start, with pay as you go credit top ups. Startup is $300 a month ($330 of credits) and Scale $1,000 a month ($1,150 of credits). Enterprise is custom. Contact sales

Pricing confidence

How public the numbers are

Public, exact Contact only

Billing

Primary billing axis

Credits that cover runtime, LLM usage and proxies, bought through pay as you go top ups on the free Individual plan or through a monthly plan that includes more credits than its fee. enterprise contract

Variable cost

Workload / overage exposure

Low variable cost Medium variable cost

Free tier / trial

Try before you buy

Free tierTrial
No free tier

Buying motion

Self-serve vs sales call

Self-serve Sales call

Pricing verified

When this pricing was last checked

Product updates

Newest first, each linked to its source.

Asteroid

  • · Security / enterprise

    Asteroid merged its Vault and Agent Profiles into one Logins page that holds every account its browser agents sign in as, including groups of interchangeable logins for the same portal.

    Source

Island

  • · Browser/computer use

    Enterprise Browser for Agents lets endpoint and cloud agents work in SaaS, internal and public web apps through Island's browser, with the organization's policies applied.

    Source
  • · Integrations

    Claude Code, Claude Cowork, Claude for Microsoft 365 and Claude Science sessions now flow into Island's Anthropic integration through the expanded Claude Compliance API.

    Source
  • · Integrations

    Island integrated its Enterprise Agentic Control Plane with Anthropic's new Inference Hooks for Claude Enterprise.

    Source

More comparisons with Asteroid or Island

Other matchups in browser and computer-use agents

Not the pairing you were after? These compare a different set of browser and computer-use agents on the same 14 capabilities.

See all 31 browser and computer-use agents comparisons

Contact us

Found a vendor we missed? Have feedback on the index? We'd love to hear from you.