Agentic Index
7AI vs Radiant Security (2026)
Both triage the full alert stream and they differ on architecture and on what else comes with it, at 8.5 and 6.5 of 14. That verdict is the Agentic Index coverage score, graded from each vendor's own published materials.
7AI, from the Cybereason founders, swarms sixty plus domain specialized agents working each alert in parallel across endpoint, identity, cloud, email and network through to response. Radiant is adaptive triage across every alert type reaching the operations centre, with integrated log management pitched explicitly as a counterweight to security information management costs. 7AI is the more interesting architecture; Radiant's cost argument is the one your finance function will engage with.
On the Agentic Index AI SOC ranking, 7AI clears the bar and Radiant Security does not. 7AI documents all five investigation loop capabilities in full; Radiant Security documents two of the five in full. 24 of the 94 vendors in the lane clear it. See the AI SOC ranking
This comparison is published by Agentic Index, an independent agentic AI vendor research platform. 7AI and Radiant Security are each graded against the same 14 capability Agentic Index taxonomy, from the vendor's own public materials under the Agentic Index verification standard, alongside 969 researched vendors. No vendor pays for placement and no vendor has reviewed this page. How this evidence is graded
Choose 7AI if
- Documented coverage is broader and parallel specialized agents is the architecture you believe in.
- Domain depth across endpoint, identity, cloud, email and network matches your estate.
- Founding team credibility from a prior security company reduces your risk.
Choose Radiant Security if
- Security information management licensing cost is a real budget problem you must solve.
- Integrated log management means one purchase rather than two.
- Adaptive triage across every alert type is the coverage requirement.
| At a glance | 7AI | Radiant Security |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Security / SOC agent | Security / SOC agent |
| Entry price | Contact sales; enterprise contracts, AWS Marketplace procurement available | Contact sales; enterprise contracts with optional integrated log management |
| Free / trial | Enterprise evaluations through sales; no self serve trial | Enterprise evaluations through sales; no self serve trial |
| Pricing confidence | contact only | contact only |
| Feature | 7 7AI |
R Radiant Security |
|---|---|---|
| Action & orchestration | ||
|
Integrations & Tool Calling Ability to connect agents to real systems through native integrations, OAuth-authenticated actions, custom tools, APIs, webhooks, or MCP-compatible tools. |
Full / Explicit | Full / Explicit |
|
Workflow Orchestration Ability to sequence, branch, retry, route, and combine deterministic workflow nodes with autonomous agent steps. |
Full / Explicit | Partial |
|
Triggers & Channel Coverage How agents wake up and where they work: schedules, webhooks, message events, CRM events, inbox events, chat, email, voice, and collaboration tools. |
Full / Explicit | Full / Explicit |
| Knowledge & context | ||
|
Knowledge Grounding & RAG Ability to ground agent behavior in company data through document ingestion, retrieval, external knowledge APIs, semantic search, or RAG layers. |
Full / Explicit
Grounding is on the customer's own environment context graph and security telemetry rather than general document retrieval, but it is a shipped, named context product applied to every case. |
Partial |
|
Memory & State Persistence Ability to persist context across a run, conversation, workflow, user, team, or longer-term memory layer. |
Partial
Case state and an environment context graph persist and the agentic flywheel feeds outcomes back into detection, but no agent memory layer is documented as a distinct capability. |
Partial |
| Control & trust | ||
|
Human Oversight & Guardrails Approval steps, consent checkpoints, escalation rules, structured guardrails, policy constraints, and pause/resume controls. |
Full / Explicit | Partial |
|
Security, Identity & Governance RBAC, SSO, auditability, encryption, least-privilege tool access, compliance posture, and data handling policy. |
Partial
SOC 2 Type II complete, named auditor Decrypt Compliance; no trust centre, pen test, SSO or RBAC documentation retrieved. F requires an attestation plus at least one named customer facing control, so this is scope rather than doubt: confidence is high on what the attestation covers. Prior F rested on founder pedigree and an AWS Marketplace listing, which is not evidence. |
Full / Explicit |
|
Observability & Auditability Traces, logs, execution histories, metrics, audit events, and debugging detail for production agent behavior. |
Full / Explicit | Partial |
|
Deployment & Data Residency Deployment modes and options, including SaaS, dedicated cloud, VPC, on-prem, hybrid, local runtime, and self-hosting. |
Partial
Federated SIEM queries customer data where it lives, which limits movement of security telemetry, but it is a data architecture rather than a documented deployment or residency choice. |
Partial |
| Solution readiness | ||
|
Prebuilt Agents, Templates & Packs Ready-made workflows, packaged employees, templates, blueprints, industry solutions, and role-specific agents that reduce time-to-value. |
Full / Explicit | Partial |
| Platform extensibility | ||
|
Model Flexibility & Routing Ability to work across multiple foundation models, route tasks to different models, or let buyers bring their own providers and keys. |
No / Not documented | No / Not documented |
|
APIs, SDKs & MCP Extensibility Composability layer: stable APIs, SDKs, MCP tool consumption/serving, custom tools, and integration into internal systems. |
No / Not documented
Skills and Workflows are the documented build surface, but both are in product authoring rather than developer extensibility; no public API, SDK, webhooks, or MCP server found on either pass. The /build page linked from the Skills FAQ returns 404. |
No / Not documented |
|
Testing, Debugging & Optimization Testing, debugging, scoring, retries, fallbacks, quality gates, and optimization loops for improving agent workflows before and after deployment. |
No / Not documented
Detection tuning recommendations, ATT&CK coverage scoring, and Security Posture framework scoring test the customer's detection estate, not the agents; a customer facing agent evaluation product is not documented. |
No / Not documented |
| Specialist automation | ||
|
Browser & Computer Use Browser, desktop, or remote/local computer control for workflows that cannot be handled through stable APIs alone. |
No / Not documented | No / Not documented |
Pricing snapshot
Sourced from the Index pricing dataset · open each vendor's profile for full detail.
| Pricing | 7 7AI |
R Radiant Security |
|---|---|---|
|
Entry price Lowest public entry point |
Contact sales; enterprise contracts, AWS Marketplace procurement available | Contact sales; enterprise contracts with optional integrated log management |
|
Pricing confidence How public the numbers are |
Contact only | Contact only |
|
Billing Primary billing axis |
enterprise contract | enterprise contract |
|
Variable cost Workload / overage exposure |
Low variable cost | Low variable cost |
|
Free tier / trial Try before you buy |
No free tierTrial
|
No free tierTrial
|
|
Buying motion Self-serve vs sales call |
Sales call | Sales call |
More comparisons with 7AI or Radiant Security
Other matchups in security and SOC agents
Not the pairing you were after? These compare a different set of security and SOC agents on the same 14 capabilities.