Agentic Index

Plivo vs Telnyx (2026)

Both are communications providers that sell hosted voice agents on their own numbers alongside SIP trunking for agents built elsewhere, and they differ on control. That verdict is the Agentic Index coverage score, graded from each vendor's own published materials.

Plivo's AI Agent studio drafts a flow from a plain English description, lets the builder pick a GPT or Llama model for each AI step, speaks with Cartesia and ElevenLabs voices, and charges $0.03 a minute plus telephony, with a knowledge base synced from websites and apps and human handover routed by skills and queues. Telnyx offers a wider choice, from Kimi on Telnyx GPUs to OpenAI on the customer's own key or any OpenAI compatible endpoint, and lets the team pick speech providers separately, at $0.05 a minute for the voice engine plus tokens and telephony. Telnyx adds AI tests with success criteria, percentage rollouts and EU residency for voice agents. Choose Plivo for the lower per minute price and a no code start, and Telnyx when your own model endpoint, speech provider choice, testing and residency matter.

This comparison is published by Agentic Index, an independent agentic AI vendor research platform. Plivo and Telnyx are each graded against the same 14 capability Agentic Index taxonomy, from the vendor's own public materials under the Agentic Index verification standard, alongside 955 researched vendors. No vendor pays for placement and no vendor has reviewed this page. How this evidence is graded

Choose Plivo if

  • Voice agents should cost $0.03 a minute plus telephony, with the builder, knowledge base and human transfer included.
  • The team should describe an agent in plain English and edit the drafted flow.
  • The knowledge base should sync whole websites and apps such as Notion, Confluence and Zendesk and refresh weekly.
  • Human handover should route by skills and queues, with SLAs and workload on one dashboard.

Choose Telnyx if

  • You want to pick the speech to text and text to speech providers yourself, or run the model on your own endpoint.
  • Saved tests with success criteria should check each assistant, and new versions should take a share of traffic first.
  • Voice agents have to run in the EU with data kept there.
  • Business accounts should sign in through SAML single sign on.
  • A caller's earlier conversations should be loaded into context at the start of each call.
Feature
P
Plivo
T
Telnyx
Action & orchestration

Integrations & Tool Calling

Ability to connect agents to real systems through native integrations, OAuth-authenticated actions, custom tools, APIs, webhooks, or MCP-compatible tools.

Workflow Orchestration

Ability to sequence, branch, retry, route, and combine deterministic workflow nodes with autonomous agent steps.

Triggers & Channel Coverage

How agents wake up and where they work: schedules, webhooks, message events, CRM events, inbox events, chat, email, voice, and collaboration tools.

Knowledge & context

Knowledge Grounding & RAG

Ability to ground agent behavior in company data through document ingestion, retrieval, external knowledge APIs, semantic search, or RAG layers.

Memory & State Persistence

Ability to persist context across a run, conversation, workflow, user, team, or longer-term memory layer.

Control & trust

Human Oversight & Guardrails

Approval steps, consent checkpoints, escalation rules, structured guardrails, policy constraints, and pause/resume controls.

Security, Identity & Governance

RBAC, SSO, auditability, encryption, least-privilege tool access, compliance posture, and data handling policy.

Observability & Auditability

Traces, logs, execution histories, metrics, audit events, and debugging detail for production agent behavior.

Deployment & Data Residency

Deployment modes and options, including SaaS, dedicated cloud, VPC, on-prem, hybrid, local runtime, and self-hosting.

Solution readiness

Prebuilt Agents, Templates & Packs

Ready-made workflows, packaged employees, templates, blueprints, industry solutions, and role-specific agents that reduce time-to-value.

Platform extensibility

Model Flexibility & Routing

Ability to work across multiple foundation models, route tasks to different models, or let buyers bring their own providers and keys.

APIs, SDKs & MCP Extensibility

Composability layer: stable APIs, SDKs, MCP tool consumption/serving, custom tools, and integration into internal systems.

Testing, Debugging & Optimization

Testing, debugging, scoring, retries, fallbacks, quality gates, and optimization loops for improving agent workflows before and after deployment.

Specialist automation

Browser & Computer Use

Browser, desktop, or remote/local computer control for workflows that cannot be handled through stable APIs alone.

Pricing snapshot

Sourced from the Index pricing dataset · open each vendor's profile for full detail.

Pricing
P
Plivo
T
Telnyx

Entry price

Lowest public entry point

$0.03 a minute for AI agents excluding telephony · $10 free credits · Enterprise from $1,000 a month $0.05 a minute for the voice engine, including speech to text, text to speech and knowledge retrieval, with LLM tokens and telephony extra

Pricing confidence

How public the numbers are

Public, exact Public, exact

Billing

Primary billing axis

Per minute of AI agent time plus per minute telephony and per message channel fees Per minute of voice engine time, rounded up to whole minutes per call, plus LLM tokens, per minute telephony and monthly number rental

Variable cost

Workload / overage exposure

High variable cost High variable cost

Free tier / trial

Try before you buy

No free tierTrial
No free tier

Buying motion

Self-serve vs sales call

Mixed Mixed

Plivo advertises data residency in the US, the EU and Asia Pacific without saying how an account is placed in a region. Telnyx bills language model tokens and telephony on top of its engine fee, about $0.06 a minute all in by its own estimate.

More comparisons with Plivo or Telnyx

Other matchups in voice agents

Not the pairing you were after? These compare a different set of voice agents on the same 14 capabilities.

See all 44 voice agents comparisons

Contact us

Found a vendor we missed? Have feedback on the index? We'd love to hear from you.