Agentic Index
HiddenLayer vs Zenity (2026)
Both vendors last verified
HiddenLayer and Zenity both offer an API, runtime visibility and strong security controls, from different ends of the problem. That verdict is the Agentic Index coverage score, graded from each vendor's own published materials.
HiddenLayer protects the models and agents a customer builds: discovery, supply chain scanning for malware and tampering with an AIBOM, red team evaluations, and runtime policies with turn by turn session replay, as SaaS or self hosted. Zenity governs the agents a business uses as well as builds, across SaaS, cloud, endpoint and coding tools, with posture checks before go live, runtime Boundaries and Blue Agent triage under human approval, and usage based prices on AWS Marketplace. HiddenLayer installs by Helm in the customer's own environment without exposing model weights, prompts or data. Choose HiddenLayer to secure your own models and their supply chain, and Zenity to govern agents across the business.
On the Agentic Index AI SOC ranking, neither HiddenLayer nor Zenity clears the bar, which asks for all five investigation loop capabilities documented in full. HiddenLayer does not document workflow orchestration in full, nor human oversight and guardrails; Zenity does not document workflow orchestration in full. 25 of the 86 vendors in the lane clear it. See the AI SOC ranking
On the Agentic Index agent infrastructure ranking, neither HiddenLayer nor Zenity clears the bar, which asks for all five production contract capabilities documented in full. HiddenLayer does not document model flexibility and routing in full; Zenity documents two of the five in full. 33 of the 186 vendors in the lane clear it. See the agent infrastructure ranking
This comparison is published by Agentic Index, an independent agentic AI vendor research platform. HiddenLayer and Zenity are each graded against the same 14 capability Agentic Index taxonomy, from the vendor's own public materials under the Agentic Index verification standard, alongside 1,084 researched vendors. No vendor pays for placement and no vendor has reviewed this page. How this evidence is graded
Choose HiddenLayer if
- Your own models and their supply chain are the main risk.
- You need the platform self hosted, with red team evaluations of your own models.
- Agent sessions should be replayable turn by turn.
Choose Zenity if
- Agents bought and used across SaaS and endpoints need governing, not only those you build.
- No suggested fix should apply until a person approves it.
- Usage based prices on AWS Marketplace suit your procurement.
| Feature | H HiddenLayer |
Z Zenity |
|---|---|---|
| Action & orchestration | ||
|
Integrations & Tool Calling Ability to connect agents to real systems through native integrations, OAuth-authenticated actions, custom tools, APIs, webhooks, or MCP-compatible tools. |
||
|
ZenityIntegrations & Tool Calling Zenity covers Microsoft's Copilot Studio, Microsoft 365 Copilot, Power Platform and Azure AI Foundry, Salesforce Agentforce, AWS Bedrock and Google Vertex AI, ChatGPT Enterprise and Claude Enterprise, and ServiceNow. It also covers GitHub Copilot, OpenAI Codex, Microsoft Foundry and Agent 365. Custom agents report through OpenTelemetry, and Zenity integrates with CrowdStrike Falcon SIEM and ServiceNow. Sourcezenity.io/platformread 2026-09-28 |
||
|
Workflow Orchestration Ability to sequence, branch, retry, route, and combine deterministic workflow nodes with autonomous agent steps. |
||
|
ZenityWorkflow Orchestration Surface, Enforce and Protect run as a fixed product pipeline, and one Guardian Agent is live, Blue Agent, a triage assistant that works in several steps. There is no coordination among several agents and no flow the customer configures. The Clarity and Correlation agents from earlier descriptions no longer appear. Sourcezenity.io/blog/august-2026-product-updatesread 2026-09-28 |
||
|
Triggers & Channel Coverage How agents wake up and where they work: schedules, webhooks, message events, CRM events, inbox events, chat, email, voice, and collaboration tools. |
||
|
ZenityTriggers & Channel Coverage Boundaries check every agent action in real time as it happens, in prevention or detection mode, and Blue Agent triages findings as they arrive, so events start the work with no one launching it. Sourcezenity.io/platform/runtime-boundariesread 2026-09-28 |
||
| Knowledge & context | ||
|
Knowledge Grounding & RAG Ability to ground agent behavior in company data through document ingestion, retrieval, external knowledge APIs, semantic search, or RAG layers. |
||
|
ZenityKnowledge Grounding & RAG A live inventory covers agents across SaaS, custom and endpoint deployments, with identity, data and behavior signals correlated into attack paths. There is no retrieval layer that an agent queries, and Blue Agent gathers context for each finding. Sourcezenity.io/platformread 2026-09-28 |
||
|
Memory & State Persistence Ability to persist context across a run, conversation, workflow, user, team, or longer-term memory layer. |
||
|
ZenityMemory & State Persistence Blue Agent's triage guidelines are generated at onboarding and persist for the organization, and the agent suggests revisions when it sees a need. That state persists and the agent maintains it, and Zenity says nothing more about its scope or lifetime. Sourcezenity.io/blog/august-2026-product-updatesread 2026-09-28 |
||
| Control & trust | ||
|
Human Oversight & Guardrails Approval steps, consent checkpoints, escalation rules, structured guardrails, policy constraints, and pause/resume controls. |
||
|
ZenityHuman Oversight & Guardrails Blue Agent runs in suggest mode, so nothing it proposes is applied without a person's approval. On the customer's agents, Boundaries let an action through, block it or shut the agent down. Sourcezenity.io/blog/august-2026-product-updatesread 2026-09-28 |
||
|
Security, Identity & Governance RBAC, SSO, auditability, encryption, least-privilege tool access, compliance posture, and data handling policy. |
||
|
ZenitySecurity, Identity & Governance Attestations on the trust center cover SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001 and ISO 27701, with full reports on request. Account setup offers SSO through Azure AD and Okta or generic SAML and OIDC, along with an IP allowlist and encryption keys the customer manages. FedRAMP is in process, not authorized. Sourcedocs.zenity.io/ssoread 2026-09-28 |
||
|
Observability & Auditability Traces, logs, execution histories, metrics, audit events, and debugging detail for production agent behavior. |
||
|
ZenityObservability & Auditability The customer's agents are analyzed in context: execution paths, tool invocations and memory updates, along with decision flows, RAG queries and file access. Each agent has an activity record, and spans from custom agents come in through OpenTelemetry, so every tool call the customer's agents make is on record. Sourcezenity.io/platform/ai-observabilityread 2026-09-28 |
||
|
Deployment & Data Residency Deployment modes and options, including SaaS, dedicated cloud, VPC, on-prem, hybrid, local runtime, and self-hosting. |
||
|
ZenityDeployment & Data Residency Commercial customers get SaaS on AWS. A federal deployment inside Knox Systems' platform is in process for FedRAMP, a second environment not yet authorized. There is no region list or option to host in the customer's own environment. Encryption keys the customer manages protect data but do not set where it lives, and the agent platforms Zenity covers are not where it is hosted. Sourcezenity.io/company-overview/newsroom/company-news/zenity-achieves-fedramp-in-process-status-for-ai-agent-securityread 2026-09-28 |
||
| Solution readiness | ||
|
Prebuilt Agents, Templates & Packs Ready-made workflows, packaged employees, templates, blueprints, industry solutions, and role-specific agents that reduce time-to-value. |
||
|
ZenityPrebuilt Agents, Templates & Packs A library of prebuilt Boundaries rules and a snippet library of prebuilt examples ship without a named catalog, and one Guardian Agent, Blue Agent, is live. There is no named set of prebuilt agents. Sourcezenity.io/platform/runtime-boundariesread 2026-09-28 |
||
| Platform extensibility | ||
|
Model Flexibility & Routing Ability to work across multiple foundation models, route tasks to different models, or let buyers bring their own providers and keys. |
||
|
ZenityModel Flexibility & Routing No model provider, choice or routing is named for Blue Agent or the platform's analysis. Zenity covers agents built on many models, which does not give its customers a choice of model for Zenity itself. Sourcezenity.io/platformread 2026-09-28 |
||
|
APIs, SDKs & MCP Extensibility Composability layer: stable APIs, SDKs, MCP tool consumption/serving, custom tools, and integration into internal systems. |
||
|
ZenityAPIs, SDKs & MCP Extensibility The Evaluate API lets customers' custom agents call Zenity for inline enforcement decisions on their actions, alongside OpenTelemetry ingestion. It has a public documentation page, Custom Agents: Evaluate API, but the page shows no reference content. Sourcedocs.zenity.io/integration/custom-agents-evaluate-apiread 2026-09-28 |
||
|
Testing, Debugging & Optimization Testing, debugging, scoring, retries, fallbacks, quality gates, and optimization loops for improving agent workflows before and after deployment. |
||
|
ZenityTesting, Debugging & Optimization Before anything goes live, the customer's agents are checked for configuration and permissions against policy, and attack paths that correlated signals show to be reachable are scored from 0 to 100. That validates configuration. There is no red teaming or scored test run against the customer's agents. Sourcezenity.io/platform/ai-exposure-managementread 2026-09-28 |
||
| Specialist automation | ||
|
Browser & Computer Use Browser, desktop, or remote/local computer control for workflows that cannot be handled through stable APIs alone. |
||
|
ZenityBrowser & Computer Use Zenity governs other agents, browser and endpoint agents among them, and does not drive an interface itself or use a browser or computer. Sourcezenity.io/platformread 2026-09-28 |
||
Pricing snapshot
Sourced from the Index pricing dataset · open each vendor's profile for full detail.
| Pricing | H HiddenLayer |
Z Zenity |
|---|---|---|
|
Entry price Lowest public entry point |
Contact sales; no prices are published. | AWS Marketplace (Security Hub Extended): Observability at $130 per resource per month, plus Runtime Protection at $16 and Guardrails for AWS at $2 per million tokens per month. |
|
Pricing confidence How public the numbers are |
Contact only | Public, partial |
|
Billing Primary billing axis |
Inference, not stated by the vendor: modules adopted and the scope of models, applications and agents covered. | Per monitored resource per month for observability, plus per million tokens for runtime protection and guardrails (AWS Security Hub Extended); private-offer contracts otherwise. |
|
Variable cost Workload / overage exposure |
Medium variable cost | High variable cost |
|
Free tier / trial Try before you buy |
No free tier
|
No free tierTrial
|
|
Buying motion Self-serve vs sales call |
Sales call | Mixed |
|
Pricing verified When this pricing was last checked |
Product updates
Newest first, each linked to its source.
HiddenLayer
-
· Integrations
Runtime detections for AI agents from HiddenLayer now arrive in Splunk through its HTTP Event Collector and in Microsoft Sentinel through a Log Analytics table, and model scan results reach Splunk the same way.
Source -
· Security / enterprise
AI Supply Chain Security 26.10.0 lets a tenant add multiple rules to its Supply Chain policy.
Source
Zenity
-
· Human approval / guardrails
Zenity now supports tool call validation in Anthropic's Inference Hooks for Claude Enterprise, so each tool call Claude proposes is held for an allow or deny verdict from Zenity before it runs.
Source -
· Integrations
Zenity announced an integration with AWS Security Hub to secure enterprise AI agents.
Source -
· Integrations
Zenity extended its AI agent security and governance platform to support Claude Enterprise.
Source
More comparisons with HiddenLayer or Zenity
Other matchups in security and SOC agents
Not the pairing you were after? These compare a different set of security and SOC agents on the same 14 capabilities.