Agentic Index
Floworks vs Jeeva (2026)
Floworks and Jeeva are young multi agent AI SDR challengers with free entry points.
Floworks leads with Alisha on its proprietary ThorV2 model, plus a free research agent named Jesse, with its Ultra tier at 498 dollars a month. Jeeva runs a multi agent pipeline from inside Gmail and Outlook with published tiers from roughly 49 dollars. Both carry thinner public documentation than the category leaders, so pilot before committing.
Choose Floworks if
- The proprietary model pitch appeals: ThorV2 is tuned for the sales conversation itself.
- Jesse as a free research agent is a genuinely useful zero cost entry.
- You want email and LinkedIn executed by one named agent end to end.
Choose Jeeva if
- Inbox native operation means adoption without a new surface.
- Cheaper published tiers cover discovery through outreach for a lean team.
- The multi agent split, discover, enrich, score, reach out, gives you inspectable stages.
| At a glance | Floworks | Jeeva |
|---|---|---|
| Category | GTM / revenue agent | GTM / revenue agent |
| Entry price | Jesse research agent free · 3 tiers (email-only, email+LinkedIn, Ultra) · Ultra $498/mo · lower tiers from ~$200/mo (unconfirmed) · CRM sync needs annual commitment | Free plan · Essentials ~$49/mo · Growth ~$119/mo · Scale ~$299/mo · credit-based (credits don't roll over) |
| Free / trial | Jesse research agent free to start (no credit card). 10% additional discount on annual plans for Y Combinator referrals. | Free plan (lead discovery, enrichment, single-lead research, email finding/verification, Chrome Extension, email templates; limited credits). Free trial available. |
| Pricing confidence | public partial | public exact |
| Feature | F Floworks |
J Jeeva |
|---|---|---|
| Action & orchestration | ||
|
Integrations & Tool Calling Ability to connect agents to real systems through native integrations, OAuth-authenticated actions, custom tools, APIs, webhooks, or MCP-compatible tools. |
Partial | Partial |
|
Workflow Orchestration Ability to sequence, branch, retry, route, and combine deterministic workflow nodes with autonomous agent steps. |
Partial | Partial |
|
Triggers & Channel Coverage How agents wake up and where they work: schedules, webhooks, message events, CRM events, inbox events, chat, email, voice, and collaboration tools. |
Partial | Full / Explicit |
| Knowledge & context | ||
|
Knowledge Grounding & RAG Ability to ground agent behavior in company data through document ingestion, retrieval, external knowledge APIs, semantic search, or RAG layers. |
Full / Explicit | Partial |
|
Memory & State Persistence Ability to persist context across a run, conversation, workflow, user, team, or longer-term memory layer. |
No / Not documented | No / Not documented |
| Control & trust | ||
|
Human Oversight & Guardrails Approval steps, consent checkpoints, escalation rules, structured guardrails, policy constraints, and pause/resume controls. |
No / Not documented | Partial |
|
Security, Identity & Governance RBAC, SSO, auditability, encryption, least-privilege tool access, compliance posture, and data handling policy. |
No / Not documented | Partial |
|
Observability & Auditability Traces, logs, execution histories, metrics, audit events, and debugging detail for production agent behavior. |
No / Not documented | Partial |
|
Deployment & Data Residency Deployment modes and options, including SaaS, dedicated cloud, VPC, on-prem, hybrid, local runtime, and self-hosting. |
No / Not documented | No / Not documented |
| Solution readiness | ||
|
Prebuilt Agents, Templates & Packs Ready-made workflows, packaged employees, templates, blueprints, industry solutions, and role-specific agents that reduce time-to-value. |
Partial | Partial |
| Platform extensibility | ||
|
Model Flexibility & Routing Ability to work across multiple foundation models, route tasks to different models, or let buyers bring their own providers and keys. |
No / Not documented | No / Not documented |
|
APIs, SDKs & MCP Extensibility Composability layer: stable APIs, SDKs, MCP tool consumption/serving, custom tools, and integration into internal systems. |
No / Not documented | Partial |
|
Testing, Debugging & Optimization Testing, debugging, scoring, retries, fallbacks, quality gates, and optimization loops for improving agent workflows before and after deployment. |
No / Not documented | Partial |
| Specialist automation | ||
|
Browser & Computer Use Browser, desktop, or remote/local computer control for workflows that cannot be handled through stable APIs alone. |
Partial | Partial |
Pricing snapshot
Sourced from the Index pricing dataset · open each vendor's profile for full detail.
| Pricing | F Floworks |
J Jeeva |
|---|---|---|
|
Entry price Lowest public entry point |
Jesse research agent free · 3 tiers (email-only, email+LinkedIn, Ultra) · Ultra $498/mo · lower tiers from ~$200/mo (unconfirmed) · CRM sync needs annual commitment | Free plan · Essentials ~$49/mo · Growth ~$119/mo · Scale ~$299/mo · credit-based (credits don't roll over) |
|
Pricing confidence How public the numbers are |
Public, partial | Public, exact |
|
Billing Primary billing axis |
Tiered monthly subscription by plan and channel coverage (email-only, email+LinkedIn, Ultra); Pro tier has a per-meeting component; free research agent tier | Tiered monthly subscription plus a monthly credit pool; credits power email sends, LinkedIn tasks, data lookups, and voice drops (credits do not roll over) |
|
Variable cost Workload / overage exposure |
Medium variable cost | High variable cost |
|
Free tier / trial Try before you buy |
Free tier
|
Free tierTrial
|
|
Buying motion Self-serve vs sales call |
Self-serve | Self-serve |
More comparisons with Floworks or Jeeva
Other matchups in GTM and revenue agents
Not the pairing you were after? These compare a different set of GTM and revenue agents on the same 14 capabilities.