Agentic Index
Epiminds vs Kana (2026)
Two agentic marketing platforms that both keep humans in control, at 6.5 and 6.5 of 14. That verdict is the Agentic Index coverage score, graded from each vendor's own published materials.
Epiminds is a multi agent marketing team fronted by Lucy, orchestrating more than twenty specialized agents that report, optimize, pace budgets and execute across Google, Meta and TikTok, built for agencies. Kana is loosely coupled tailorable agents that plan, run and optimize campaigns with human approval gates throughout. Epiminds is paid media execution with a named orchestrator; Kana is a more general campaign platform you shape to your process.
This comparison is published by Agentic Index, an independent agentic AI vendor research platform. Epiminds and Kana are each graded against the same 14 capability Agentic Index taxonomy, from the vendor's own public materials under the Agentic Index verification standard, alongside 969 researched vendors. No vendor pays for placement and no vendor has reviewed this page. How this evidence is graded
Choose Epiminds if
- Paid media across Google, Meta and TikTok is the work, and budget pacing is the daily job.
- Documented coverage is broader and agency scale operations are the design point.
- A named orchestrator fronting twenty plus agents is a model your team can actually manage.
Choose Kana if
- Campaign planning beyond paid media is in scope.
- Loosely coupled agents you tailor individually fit a process you do not want to change.
- Approval gates throughout, rather than at the end, is the oversight model you need.
| At a glance | Epiminds | Kana |
|---|---|---|
| Category | GTM / revenue agent | GTM / revenue agent |
| Entry price | Contact sales (pricing not yet public) | Custom (contact sales) |
| Free / trial | Closed beta on some surfaces; no public free tier documented | — |
| Pricing confidence | contact only | contact only |
| Feature | E Epiminds |
K Kana |
|---|---|---|
| Action & orchestration | ||
|
Integrations & Tool Calling Ability to connect agents to real systems through native integrations, OAuth-authenticated actions, custom tools, APIs, webhooks, or MCP-compatible tools. |
Full / Explicit | Full / Explicit |
|
Workflow Orchestration Ability to sequence, branch, retry, route, and combine deterministic workflow nodes with autonomous agent steps. |
Full / Explicit | Full / Explicit |
|
Triggers & Channel Coverage How agents wake up and where they work: schedules, webhooks, message events, CRM events, inbox events, chat, email, voice, and collaboration tools. |
Full / Explicit | Partial |
| Knowledge & context | ||
|
Knowledge Grounding & RAG Ability to ground agent behavior in company data through document ingestion, retrieval, external knowledge APIs, semantic search, or RAG layers. |
Full / Explicit | Full / Explicit |
|
Memory & State Persistence Ability to persist context across a run, conversation, workflow, user, team, or longer-term memory layer. |
Partial | Partial |
| Control & trust | ||
|
Human Oversight & Guardrails Approval steps, consent checkpoints, escalation rules, structured guardrails, policy constraints, and pause/resume controls. |
Partial | Full / Explicit |
|
Security, Identity & Governance RBAC, SSO, auditability, encryption, least-privilege tool access, compliance posture, and data handling policy. |
No / Not documented | No / Not documented |
|
Observability & Auditability Traces, logs, execution histories, metrics, audit events, and debugging detail for production agent behavior. |
No / Not documented | No / Not documented |
|
Deployment & Data Residency Deployment modes and options, including SaaS, dedicated cloud, VPC, on-prem, hybrid, local runtime, and self-hosting. |
No / Not documented | No / Not documented |
| Solution readiness | ||
|
Prebuilt Agents, Templates & Packs Ready-made workflows, packaged employees, templates, blueprints, industry solutions, and role-specific agents that reduce time-to-value. |
Full / Explicit | Partial |
| Platform extensibility | ||
|
Model Flexibility & Routing Ability to work across multiple foundation models, route tasks to different models, or let buyers bring their own providers and keys. |
Partial | Partial |
|
APIs, SDKs & MCP Extensibility Composability layer: stable APIs, SDKs, MCP tool consumption/serving, custom tools, and integration into internal systems. |
No / Not documented | No / Not documented |
|
Testing, Debugging & Optimization Testing, debugging, scoring, retries, fallbacks, quality gates, and optimization loops for improving agent workflows before and after deployment. |
No / Not documented | Partial |
| Specialist automation | ||
|
Browser & Computer Use Browser, desktop, or remote/local computer control for workflows that cannot be handled through stable APIs alone. |
No / Not documented | No / Not documented |
Pricing snapshot
Sourced from the Index pricing dataset · open each vendor's profile for full detail.
| Pricing | E Epiminds |
K Kana |
|---|---|---|
|
Entry price Lowest public entry point |
Contact sales (pricing not yet public) | Custom (contact sales) |
|
Pricing confidence How public the numbers are |
Contact only | Contact only |
|
Billing Primary billing axis |
— | — |
|
Variable cost Workload / overage exposure |
Medium variable cost | Medium variable cost |
|
Free tier / trial Try before you buy |
No free tier
|
No free tier
|
|
Buying motion Self-serve vs sales call |
Sales call | Sales call |
Other matchups in GTM and revenue agents
Not the pairing you were after? These compare a different set of GTM and revenue agents on the same 14 capabilities.