Agentic Index
Denki vs Fieldguide (2026)
Both automate audit work and the documented gap is wide, 3 of 14 against 7.5. That verdict is the Agentic Index coverage score, graded from each vendor's own published materials.
Fieldguide is a platform for audit and advisory firms automating workpapers, testing and engagement workflows, priced by engagement volume and practice size. Denki runs autonomous audit agents for Sarbanes Oxley and anti money laundering evidence, control testing and reconciliation with full audit traces. Fieldguide serves the firm doing the audit; Denki serves the company being audited, which is a different buyer with a different budget.
This comparison is published by Agentic Index, an independent agentic AI vendor research platform. Denki and Fieldguide are each graded against the same 14 capability Agentic Index taxonomy, from the vendor's own public materials under the Agentic Index verification standard, alongside 969 researched vendors. No vendor pays for placement and no vendor has reviewed this page. How this evidence is graded
Choose Denki if
- You are the company under audit and internal control testing is your recurring burden.
- Sarbanes Oxley and anti money laundering evidence collection is the specific work.
- Full audit traces on agent actions are what your external auditor will examine.
Choose Fieldguide if
- Documented coverage is materially broader across the matrix.
- You are an audit or advisory firm and workpapers are the deliverable.
- Engagement workflow, not just testing, is what you need automated.
| At a glance | Denki | Fieldguide |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Enterprise operations agent | Enterprise operations agent |
| Entry price | Contact for pricing | Contact for pricing |
| Free / trial | — | Request Demo on every page; no free tier or trial |
| Pricing confidence | contact only | contact only |
| Feature | D Denki |
F Fieldguide |
|---|---|---|
| Action & orchestration | ||
|
Integrations & Tool Calling Ability to connect agents to real systems through native integrations, OAuth-authenticated actions, custom tools, APIs, webhooks, or MCP-compatible tools. |
Partial | Partial |
|
Workflow Orchestration Ability to sequence, branch, retry, route, and combine deterministic workflow nodes with autonomous agent steps. |
Full / Explicit | Full / Explicit |
|
Triggers & Channel Coverage How agents wake up and where they work: schedules, webhooks, message events, CRM events, inbox events, chat, email, voice, and collaboration tools. |
Unknown / Unspecified | Partial |
| Knowledge & context | ||
|
Knowledge Grounding & RAG Ability to ground agent behavior in company data through document ingestion, retrieval, external knowledge APIs, semantic search, or RAG layers. |
Partial | Full / Explicit |
|
Memory & State Persistence Ability to persist context across a run, conversation, workflow, user, team, or longer-term memory layer. |
Unknown / Unspecified | Partial |
| Control & trust | ||
|
Human Oversight & Guardrails Approval steps, consent checkpoints, escalation rules, structured guardrails, policy constraints, and pause/resume controls. |
Unknown / Unspecified | Full / Explicit |
|
Security, Identity & Governance RBAC, SSO, auditability, encryption, least-privilege tool access, compliance posture, and data handling policy. |
Unknown / Unspecified | Full / Explicit |
|
Observability & Auditability Traces, logs, execution histories, metrics, audit events, and debugging detail for production agent behavior. |
Full / Explicit | Partial |
|
Deployment & Data Residency Deployment modes and options, including SaaS, dedicated cloud, VPC, on-prem, hybrid, local runtime, and self-hosting. |
Unknown / Unspecified | No / Not documented |
| Solution readiness | ||
|
Prebuilt Agents, Templates & Packs Ready-made workflows, packaged employees, templates, blueprints, industry solutions, and role-specific agents that reduce time-to-value. |
Unknown / Unspecified | Full / Explicit |
| Platform extensibility | ||
|
Model Flexibility & Routing Ability to work across multiple foundation models, route tasks to different models, or let buyers bring their own providers and keys. |
Unknown / Unspecified | No / Not documented |
|
APIs, SDKs & MCP Extensibility Composability layer: stable APIs, SDKs, MCP tool consumption/serving, custom tools, and integration into internal systems. |
Unknown / Unspecified | Partial |
|
Testing, Debugging & Optimization Testing, debugging, scoring, retries, fallbacks, quality gates, and optimization loops for improving agent workflows before and after deployment. |
Unknown / Unspecified | No / Not documented |
| Specialist automation | ||
|
Browser & Computer Use Browser, desktop, or remote/local computer control for workflows that cannot be handled through stable APIs alone. |
Unknown / Unspecified | No / Not documented |
Pricing snapshot
Sourced from the Index pricing dataset · open each vendor's profile for full detail.
| Pricing | D Denki |
F Fieldguide |
|---|---|---|
|
Entry price Lowest public entry point |
Contact for pricing | Contact for pricing |
|
Pricing confidence How public the numbers are |
Contact only | Contact only |
|
Billing Primary billing axis |
— | — |
|
Variable cost Workload / overage exposure |
Medium variable cost | Medium variable cost |
|
Free tier / trial Try before you buy |
No free tier
|
No free tier
|
|
Buying motion Self-serve vs sales call |
Sales call | Sales call |
Other matchups in enterprise operations agents
Not the pairing you were after? These compare a different set of enterprise operations agents on the same 14 capabilities.