Agentic Index
Browserbase vs Tinyfish (2026)
Browserbase and Tinyfish both sell web agent infrastructure, one level apart: Browserbase provides the hosted browsers developers build agents on, from 20 dollars a month, while Tinyfish operates the agents themselves, navigating, authenticating, extracting, and transacting across hundreds of live sites in parallel through one MCP native API, with usage pricing at about 1.6 cents an agent step and free search and fetch. That verdict is the Agentic Index coverage score, graded from each vendor's own published materials.
Choose Browserbase to build your own web agents, Tinyfish to call web agency as an API.
This comparison is published by Agentic Index, an independent agentic AI vendor research platform. Browserbase and Tinyfish are each graded against the same 14 capability Agentic Index taxonomy, from the vendor's own public materials under the Agentic Index verification standard, alongside 956 researched vendors. No vendor pays for placement and no vendor has reviewed this page. How this evidence is graded
Choose Browserbase if
- You are building custom agents and want infrastructure control at the browser layer.
- Model choice and testing tools for your agents matter to your engineering team.
- Owning the agent logic is strategic for your product.
Choose Tinyfish if
- You want web tasks done via API without building or operating agents.
- Parallel operation across hundreds of sites is the actual requirement.
- MCP native integration drops into your agent stack with no glue code.
| At a glance | Browserbase | Tinyfish |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Browser / computer-use agent | Browser / computer-use agent |
| Entry price | From $20 a month (Developer) · free tier | Pay per use: Agent $0.016 a step, Browser $0.002 a minute; Search and Fetch free |
| Free / trial | Free plan, no card: 1 browser hour, 3 concurrent sessions, 3 Agent calls | Search and Fetch free within rate limits |
| Pricing confidence | public partial | public exact |
| Feature | B Browserbase |
T Tinyfish |
|---|---|---|
| Action & orchestration | ||
|
Integrations & Tool Calling Ability to connect agents to real systems through native integrations, OAuth-authenticated actions, custom tools, APIs, webhooks, or MCP-compatible tools. |
Partial | Partial |
|
Workflow Orchestration Ability to sequence, branch, retry, route, and combine deterministic workflow nodes with autonomous agent steps. |
Partial | Partial |
|
Triggers & Channel Coverage How agents wake up and where they work: schedules, webhooks, message events, CRM events, inbox events, chat, email, voice, and collaboration tools. |
Partial | Full / Explicit |
| Knowledge & context | ||
|
Knowledge Grounding & RAG Ability to ground agent behavior in company data through document ingestion, retrieval, external knowledge APIs, semantic search, or RAG layers. |
No / Not documented | No / Not documented |
|
Memory & State Persistence Ability to persist context across a run, conversation, workflow, user, team, or longer-term memory layer. |
Partial | No / Not documented |
| Control & trust | ||
|
Human Oversight & Guardrails Approval steps, consent checkpoints, escalation rules, structured guardrails, policy constraints, and pause/resume controls. |
Full / Explicit | Partial |
|
Security, Identity & Governance RBAC, SSO, auditability, encryption, least-privilege tool access, compliance posture, and data handling policy. |
Full / Explicit | Full / Explicit |
|
Observability & Auditability Traces, logs, execution histories, metrics, audit events, and debugging detail for production agent behavior. |
Full / Explicit | Full / Explicit |
|
Deployment & Data Residency Deployment modes and options, including SaaS, dedicated cloud, VPC, on-prem, hybrid, local runtime, and self-hosting. |
Full / Explicit | Full / Explicit |
| Solution readiness | ||
|
Prebuilt Agents, Templates & Packs Ready-made workflows, packaged employees, templates, blueprints, industry solutions, and role-specific agents that reduce time-to-value. |
No / Not documented | No / Not documented |
| Platform extensibility | ||
|
Model Flexibility & Routing Ability to work across multiple foundation models, route tasks to different models, or let buyers bring their own providers and keys. |
Full / Explicit | No / Not documented |
|
APIs, SDKs & MCP Extensibility Composability layer: stable APIs, SDKs, MCP tool consumption/serving, custom tools, and integration into internal systems. |
Full / Explicit | Full / Explicit |
|
Testing, Debugging & Optimization Testing, debugging, scoring, retries, fallbacks, quality gates, and optimization loops for improving agent workflows before and after deployment. |
Full / Explicit | No / Not documented |
| Specialist automation | ||
|
Browser & Computer Use Browser, desktop, or remote/local computer control for workflows that cannot be handled through stable APIs alone. |
Full / Explicit | Full / Explicit |
Pricing snapshot
Sourced from the Index pricing dataset · open each vendor's profile for full detail.
| Pricing | B Browserbase |
T Tinyfish |
|---|---|---|
|
Entry price Lowest public entry point |
From $20 a month (Developer) · free tier | Pay per use: Agent $0.016 a step, Browser $0.002 a minute; Search and Fetch free |
|
Pricing confidence How public the numbers are |
Public, partial | Public, exact |
|
Billing Primary billing axis |
hybrid | — |
|
Variable cost Workload / overage exposure |
High variable cost | High variable cost |
|
Free tier / trial Try before you buy |
Free tier
|
Free tier
|
|
Buying motion Self-serve vs sales call |
Mixed | — |
More comparisons with Browserbase or Tinyfish
Other matchups in browser and computer-use agents
Not the pairing you were after? These compare a different set of browser and computer-use agents on the same 14 capabilities.