Agentic Index
Agno vs Mastra (2026)
Choose Agno if your team builds in Python and wants a fast, memory equipped runtime, and choose Mastra if your team builds in TypeScript and wants evals and workflow orchestration in the same box. That verdict is the Agentic Index coverage score, graded from each vendor's own published materials.
Agno (formerly Phidata) is Apache 2.0 with self hosting and paid plans from 150 dollars a month with a free tier, while Mastra is dual licensed with Mastra Studio and plans from 250 dollars a month with a free tier. Language of the codebase is the honest deciding factor for most teams.
On the Agentic Index agent infrastructure ranking, Agno and Mastra both clear the bar: each documents all five production contract capabilities in full. 34 of the 186 vendors in the lane clear it. See the agent infrastructure ranking
This comparison is published by Agentic Index, an independent agentic AI vendor research platform. Agno and Mastra are each graded against the same 14 capability Agentic Index taxonomy, from the vendor's own public materials under the Agentic Index verification standard, alongside 956 researched vendors. No vendor pays for placement and no vendor has reviewed this page. How this evidence is graded
Choose Agno if
- Your stack is Python and you want a high performance agent runtime with built in memory
- Apache 2.0 self hosting with no license friction is a requirement
- You want multi agent support without adopting a heavier orchestration platform
Choose Mastra if
- Your stack is TypeScript and you want agents, workflows, and evals in one framework
- Mastra Studio as a control plane appeals more than assembling separate tools
- Built in eval tooling during development matters as much as runtime performance
| At a glance | Agno | Mastra |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Agent infrastructure | Agent infrastructure |
| Entry price | From $150/mo · free tier | From $250/mo · free tier |
| Free / trial | Free tier | Free tier |
| Pricing confidence | public exact | public exact |
| Feature | A Agno |
M Mastra |
|---|---|---|
| Action & orchestration | ||
|
Integrations & Tool Calling Ability to connect agents to real systems through native integrations, OAuth-authenticated actions, custom tools, APIs, webhooks, or MCP-compatible tools. |
Full / Explicit | Full / Explicit |
|
Workflow Orchestration Ability to sequence, branch, retry, route, and combine deterministic workflow nodes with autonomous agent steps. |
Full / Explicit | Full / Explicit |
|
Triggers & Channel Coverage How agents wake up and where they work: schedules, webhooks, message events, CRM events, inbox events, chat, email, voice, and collaboration tools. |
Full / Explicit | Full / Explicit |
| Knowledge & context | ||
|
Knowledge Grounding & RAG Ability to ground agent behavior in company data through document ingestion, retrieval, external knowledge APIs, semantic search, or RAG layers. |
Full / Explicit | Full / Explicit |
|
Memory & State Persistence Ability to persist context across a run, conversation, workflow, user, team, or longer-term memory layer. |
Full / Explicit | Full / Explicit |
| Control & trust | ||
|
Human Oversight & Guardrails Approval steps, consent checkpoints, escalation rules, structured guardrails, policy constraints, and pause/resume controls. |
Full / Explicit | Full / Explicit |
|
Security, Identity & Governance RBAC, SSO, auditability, encryption, least-privilege tool access, compliance posture, and data handling policy. |
Full / Explicit | Full / Explicit |
|
Observability & Auditability Traces, logs, execution histories, metrics, audit events, and debugging detail for production agent behavior. |
Full / Explicit | Full / Explicit |
|
Deployment & Data Residency Deployment modes and options, including SaaS, dedicated cloud, VPC, on-prem, hybrid, local runtime, and self-hosting. |
Full / Explicit | Full / Explicit |
| Solution readiness | ||
|
Prebuilt Agents, Templates & Packs Ready-made workflows, packaged employees, templates, blueprints, industry solutions, and role-specific agents that reduce time-to-value. |
Full / Explicit | Full / Explicit |
| Platform extensibility | ||
|
Model Flexibility & Routing Ability to work across multiple foundation models, route tasks to different models, or let buyers bring their own providers and keys. |
Full / Explicit | Full / Explicit |
|
APIs, SDKs & MCP Extensibility Composability layer: stable APIs, SDKs, MCP tool consumption/serving, custom tools, and integration into internal systems. |
Full / Explicit | Full / Explicit |
|
Testing, Debugging & Optimization Testing, debugging, scoring, retries, fallbacks, quality gates, and optimization loops for improving agent workflows before and after deployment. |
Full / Explicit | Full / Explicit |
| Specialist automation | ||
|
Browser & Computer Use Browser, desktop, or remote/local computer control for workflows that cannot be handled through stable APIs alone. |
No / Not documented | Full / Explicit |
Pricing snapshot
Sourced from the Index pricing dataset · open each vendor's profile for full detail.
| Pricing | A Agno |
M Mastra |
|---|---|---|
|
Entry price Lowest public entry point |
From $150/mo · free tier | From $250/mo · free tier |
|
Pricing confidence How public the numbers are |
Public, exact | Public, exact |
|
Billing Primary billing axis |
flat | hybrid |
|
Variable cost Workload / overage exposure |
Low variable cost | Medium variable cost |
|
Free tier / trial Try before you buy |
Free tierTrial
|
Free tier
|
|
Buying motion Self-serve vs sales call |
Mixed | Mixed |
More comparisons with Agno or Mastra
Other matchups in agent infrastructure platforms
Not the pairing you were after? These compare a different set of agent infrastructure platforms on the same 14 capabilities.