Agentic Index
ThreatModeler vs Zeron (2026)
Both vendors last verified
ThreatModeler and Zeron both run governed multi agent systems for security risk, and they aim at different jobs. That verdict is the Agentic Index coverage score, graded from each vendor's own published materials.
ThreatModeler, which acquired IriusRisk in January 2026, builds and maintains threat models for applications, cloud, OT and AI agents, grounded in a persistent Secure Design Graph and a deterministic framework, with MCP integration. It is sold through direct engagement scaled to applications, users and modules. Zeron's ZAK agents act on the security stack under policies written in a domain specific language, with Slack approvals and a tamper evident Action Ledger, beside cyber risk quantification, an open source agent development kit, and SaaS or self hosted deployment. Zeron holds ISO 27001, ISO 42001 and SOC 2 Type II and can require an approval in Slack before any action, while ThreatModeler's deterministic framework commits agent output without an approval step. ThreatModeler runs on whatever model the customer brings, and Zeron names none. Choose ThreatModeler for threat modeling at enterprise scale. Choose Zeron for policy bound agents with approvals and a ledger.
On the Agentic Index AI SOC ranking, Zeron clears the bar and ThreatModeler does not. Zeron documents all five investigation loop capabilities in full; ThreatModeler does not document human oversight and guardrails in full. 25 of the 86 vendors in the lane clear it. See the AI SOC ranking
This comparison is published by Agentic Index, an independent agentic AI vendor research platform. ThreatModeler and Zeron are each graded against the same 14 capability Agentic Index taxonomy, from the vendor's own public materials under the Agentic Index verification standard, alongside 1,084 researched vendors. No vendor pays for placement and no vendor has reviewed this page. How this evidence is graded
Choose ThreatModeler if
- Threat models for applications, cloud, OT and AI agents are the job.
- Models should stay grounded in a persistent design graph.
- The agents must run on a model you bring yourself.
Choose Zeron if
- Agents should act only under written policy, with Slack approvals and a tamper evident ledger.
- Policies should be able to demand a Slack approval before an agent acts.
- Cyber risk quantification and an open source agent kit are useful extras.
| Feature | T ThreatModeler |
Z Zeron |
|---|---|---|
| Action & orchestration | ||
|
Integrations & Tool Calling Ability to connect agents to real systems through native integrations, OAuth-authenticated actions, custom tools, APIs, webhooks, or MCP-compatible tools. |
||
|
ThreatModelerIntegrations & Tool Calling Integrations cover ticketing, diagram and enterprise architecture import, CI/CD and cloud, and the ThreatModeler MCP Server brings threat modeling into AI assistants, GitHub and IDEs. The MCP Server works with ChatGPT and Claude, with editors such as Cursor, VS Code with Copilot and Windsurf, and with CI/CD systems including GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, Azure DevOps and Jenkins. SourceThreatModeler, threatmodeler.ai/platform and /why-threatmodeler/developersread 2026-10-05 |
||
|
ZeronIntegrations & Tool Calling 1,300+ integrations span EDR, SIEM, cloud, identity, ITSM and vendor APIs, with ZAK agents acting on the stack, for example patching an endpoint through the CrowdStrike API and updating a Jira ticket after a Slack approval. The live agents act on EDR, XDR, SIEM, CSPM, CNAPP, IAM, PAM, SOAR, GRC, vulnerability management and CMDB tools. The platform normalizes about 7.3 million events a day into the OCSF schema and removes 68% of duplicates across tools. SourceZeron, zeron.one and /platformread 2026-10-05 |
||
|
Workflow Orchestration Ability to sequence, branch, retry, route, and combine deterministic workflow nodes with autonomous agent steps. |
||
|
ThreatModelerWorkflow Orchestration Three agents hand work along under a deterministic framework. The System Mapping Agent turns documents and diagrams into models, the Graph Agent enriches the Secure Design Graph with components and threats, and the Reporting Agent produces audit ready reports. System mapping also reads infrastructure as code and cloud context. The Graph Agent adds the controls and patterns specific to the customer's business, and the Reporting Agent writes business reports from the same governed data that produced the model. SourceThreatModeler, threatmodeler.ai/platformread 2026-10-05 |
||
|
ZeronWorkflow Orchestration Agent Builder is a visual workflow editor where teams drag triggers, compose actions and ship governed AI agents in minutes, and engineers can build agents in code with the open source ZAK kit. Either way, the customer designs the flow. Each agent runs a five step loop, observe, reason, decide, act and verify, with policy gates at every stage. In code, an engineer writes the agent's logic and tools, and the platform layer handles policy, audit and saving results to the graph. SourceZeron, zeron.one, /zak and securezeron.github.io ZAK docsread 2026-10-05 |
||
|
Triggers & Channel Coverage How agents wake up and where they work: schedules, webhooks, message events, CRM events, inbox events, chat, email, voice, and collaboration tools. |
||
|
ThreatModelerTriggers & Channel Coverage Threat modeling runs from the CI/CD pipeline and on diagram and architecture imports, so changes start the work, not a person. Every pull request is checked against the model automatically, with governance applied to each change, in GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, Azure DevOps or Jenkins. When a change opens a risk, the threat and the fix come back in the pull request. SourceThreatModeler, threatmodeler.ai/platform and /why-threatmodeler/developersread 2026-10-05 |
||
|
ZeronTriggers & Channel Coverage Agents subscribe to normalized OCSF events, such as a critical CVE detected or a vendor risk spike, and to schedules, such as a compliance drift check, and they start when one of those arrives. A policy can also fire on a newly created finding, and Agent Builder lets teams drag triggers onto a workflow. Cyber Navigator refreshes value at risk and loss curves whenever telemetry changes. SourceZeron, zeron.one and /zakread 2026-10-05 |
||
| Knowledge & context | ||
|
Knowledge Grounding & RAG Ability to ground agent behavior in company data through document ingestion, retrieval, external knowledge APIs, semantic search, or RAG layers. |
||
|
ThreatModelerKnowledge Grounding & RAG The Secure Design Graph is a persistent single source of truth connecting the customer's architectures, components, threats, controls and security decisions, grounded in a curated threat library, and every agent works on it. ThreatModeler calls it a living system of record that changes as the software does. Models follow the STRIDE, PASTA and MAESTRO methods. SourceThreatModeler, threatmodeler.ai and /platformread 2026-10-05 |
||
|
ZeronKnowledge Grounding & RAG The Security Intelligence Fabric is a graph database of assets, vulnerabilities, risks and vendors, kept separate for each tenant, that ZAK agents read and write to. Normalized findings are stitched to the asset graph, so the graph keeps up with the customer's estate. The fabric runs on Memgraph, and the platform covers more than 250 compliance frameworks. Cyber Navigator's QBER model blends industry, market cap, business line, locations and regulations with technical findings to estimate annual loss. SourceZeron, securezeron.github.io ZAK docs and zeron.one/platformread 2026-10-05 |
||
|
Memory & State Persistence Ability to persist context across a run, conversation, workflow, user, team, or longer-term memory layer. |
||
|
ThreatModelerMemory & State Persistence The Secure Design Graph, which ThreatModeler says improves every future model, is the platform's knowledge base, not memory the agents keep. The agents keep no memory of their own, with set contents or a set lifetime. SourceThreatModeler, threatmodeler.ai/platformread 2026-10-05 |
||
|
ZeronMemory & State Persistence The graph persistence ZAK handles is the Security Intelligence Fabric, the knowledge graph the agents retrieve from. Zeron describes no memory that agents keep for themselves from one run to the next. Each run names its tenant, and the graph keeps each tenant's nodes in their own namespace. SourceZeron, securezeron.github.io ZAK docsread 2026-10-05 |
||
| Control & trust | ||
|
Human Oversight & Guardrails Approval steps, consent checkpoints, escalation rules, structured guardrails, policy constraints, and pause/resume controls. |
||
|
ThreatModelerHuman Oversight & Guardrails A deterministic framework governs what the agents produce, so the same architecture gives the same threats and controls. There is no step where a person reviews or approves a generated model before it is saved. When a pull request opens a risk, the threat and the fix go back to the developer in the pull request, in a form a coding assistant can act on. SourceThreatModeler, threatmodeler.ai/platform and /why-threatmodeler/developersread 2026-10-05 |
||
|
ZeronHuman Oversight & Guardrails Policies written in Zeron's DSL can require approval before an action, for example "approve: slack('#sec-ops')", alongside hard guardrails and blast radius limits. The agent waits for that approval before it acts. A policy can set conditions on severity, internet exposure or the change in value at risk, and it can forbid an agent from touching assets with a given tag, such as production databases. Policies can be rolled back instantly, and the Action Ledger records the approvals people give. SourceZeron, zeron.one/zakread 2026-10-05 |
||
|
Security, Identity & Governance RBAC, SSO, auditability, encryption, least-privilege tool access, compliance posture, and data handling policy. |
||
|
ThreatModelerSecurity, Identity & Governance ThreatModeler Nexus carries ISO 27001:2022 and SOC 2 Type II. It is now FedRAMP Moderate authorized, where it earlier offered FedRAMP Moderate through a partner environment. There is no published SSO, SCIM or role model for the platform. The MCP Server signs clients in with OAuth 2.1. SourceThreatModeler, threatmodeler.ai and /why-threatmodeler/developersread 2026-10-05 |
||
|
ZeronSecurity, Identity & Governance Zeron holds ISO/IEC 27001:2022, ISO/IEC 42001, SOC 2 Type II and CSA STAR Level 1, and the platform provides per tenant isolation, SSO/SAML and RBAC. It also holds ISO 9001:2015. Data is encrypted in transit and at rest, customer data is never used to train models, and the platform is aligned to DPDPA, GDPR and DORA. SourceZeron, zeron.one/platformread 2026-10-05 |
||
|
Observability & Auditability Traces, logs, execution histories, metrics, audit events, and debugging detail for production agent behavior. |
||
|
ThreatModelerObservability & Auditability Every decision the agents make traces back to the architecture, controls and compliance requirements behind it, with audit ready evidence produced by the Reporting Agent. Every pull request is checked against the model, and reports map to frameworks such as NIST, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, HIPAA, DORA and the EU AI Act. SourceThreatModeler, threatmodeler.ai/platformread 2026-10-05 |
||
|
ZeronObservability & Auditability The Action Ledger is a tamper evident audit trail mapped to SCF, with every step written to it, so every agent decision can be proven after the fact. It is append only, maps each entry to the customer's control frameworks and includes the approvals people give. Every action on the platform also goes to a tamper evident audit log, and agentctl is built to discover, secure and audit agents across the organization, including agents built on other frameworks. SourceZeron, zeron.one, /zak and /platformread 2026-10-05 |
||
|
Deployment & Data Residency Deployment modes and options, including SaaS, dedicated cloud, VPC, on-prem, hybrid, local runtime, and self-hosting. |
||
|
ThreatModelerDeployment & Data Residency ThreatModeler Nexus is offered as SaaS, on premises or in a private cloud, with regional flexibility. Sourcethreatmodeler.ai/platformread 2026-09-28 |
||
|
ZeronDeployment & Data Residency Zeron deploys on premises, in the cloud or as a hybrid. The SaaS option runs on Zeron's cloud on AWS or Azure with in region hosting; Zeron handles setup, and customers work through a browser or the API. The on premises option installs on the customer's own servers, and the customer's IT team handles hardware, software and integration. SaaS can be running within hours or days, and on premises within weeks or months. Zeron does not list its regions, but says data is hosted, processed and stored inside the jurisdiction regulators require. SourceZeron, zeron.one/deployment and /platformread 2026-10-05 |
||
| Solution readiness | ||
|
Prebuilt Agents, Templates & Packs Ready-made workflows, packaged employees, templates, blueprints, industry solutions, and role-specific agents that reduce time-to-value. |
||
|
ThreatModelerPrebuilt Agents, Templates & Packs Customers adopt items from a curated library of threats, controls and components into their models. Reports map to more than 180 compliance frameworks, including PCI, NIST, HIPAA and ISO, and three named agents do separate jobs. The product line also includes CloudModeler and ThreatModeler MCP alongside the Nexus platform. SourceThreatModeler, threatmodeler.airead 2026-10-05 |
||
|
ZeronPrebuilt Agents, Templates & Packs Zeron ships named prebuilt ZAK agents with stated jobs, including Conformity (control evidence for SOC 2, ISO 27001, RBI and SEBI CSCRF; audit companion), Interno (CVE triage that opens tickets; threat hunting), Vendor Pulse (third party reassessment) and Cyber Navigator (CVaR and loss curves). In all, six agents run on the platform. Threat Hunting works on EDR and SIEM data, Vulnerability Triage on vulnerability management and Jira, Vendor Risk Watcher on GRC, Compliance Evidence on GRC and CMDB, Audit Companion on the Action Ledger and its evidence, and CRQ Refresh on SIEM data. Interno scores and ranks new CVEs before it opens tickets, and the Audit Companion answers auditors' questions in plain language. SourceZeron, zeron.one and /zakread 2026-10-05 |
||
| Platform extensibility | ||
|
Model Flexibility & Routing Ability to work across multiple foundation models, route tasks to different models, or let buyers bring their own providers and keys. |
||
|
ThreatModelerModel Flexibility & Routing Customers bring their own model, and the platform's agents run on it under the same governance, so the choice of model is the customer's. ThreatModeler does not list which providers it supports. Bring your own model sits among the platform's governance controls, beside the deterministic framework. SourceThreatModeler, threatmodeler.ai/platformread 2026-10-05 |
||
|
ZeronModel Flexibility & Routing Zeron names no model behind the ZAK agents and offers no choice of provider. The agent definition has a reasoning mode field, which sets how the agent reasons, not which model it uses. Customer data is never used to train models. SourceZeron, securezeron.github.io ZAK docs and zeron.one/platformread 2026-10-05 |
||
|
APIs, SDKs & MCP Extensibility Composability layer: stable APIs, SDKs, MCP tool consumption/serving, custom tools, and integration into internal systems. |
||
|
ThreatModelerAPIs, SDKs & MCP Extensibility The platform has its own MCP Server for AI assistants, GitHub and IDEs. It signs clients in with OAuth 2.1 and works with ChatGPT, Claude, Cursor, VS Code with Copilot and Windsurf, but no endpoint, tool list or API reference is published. When a change opens a risk, the fix comes back in a form a coding assistant can act on. SourceThreatModeler, threatmodeler.ai/platform and /why-threatmodeler/developersread 2026-10-05 |
||
|
ZeronAPIs, SDKs & MCP Extensibility ZAK is an open source agent development kit (github.com/securezeron/zeron-agent-development-kit) installable as zin-adk from pip and npm and as a Go module, with a CLI (zak init, validate, run) and developer docs, and the platform takes REST, GraphQL and webhook connectors. Engineers mark tool functions with a decorator, and the kit's platform layer supplies a policy engine, an audit logger and an agent executor. SaaS customers can also reach the platform through its API. SourceZeron, securezeron.github.io ZAK docs and zeron.one/deploymentread 2026-10-05 |
||
|
Testing, Debugging & Optimization Testing, debugging, scoring, retries, fallbacks, quality gates, and optimization loops for improving agent workflows before and after deployment. |
||
|
ThreatModelerTesting, Debugging & Optimization Outputs are deterministic. The same architecture in gives the same threats and controls out, so results repeat. There are no test cases or scores for checking the agents, and no check that a change to the agents or model must pass. Customer results it cites include half the threat modeling effort at Charles Schwab, models built five times faster and ten times as many models produced. SourceThreatModeler, threatmodeler.ai and /platformread 2026-10-05 |
||
|
ZeronTesting, Debugging & Optimization Policy Studio offers dry runs and version control before anything ships, and zak validate checks agent definitions. Both check policies and configuration. There is no way to test an agent's behavior against scored cases. The last step of each agent loop is a verify step, where the agent checks what its action did, and policies can be rolled back instantly. SourceZeron, zeron.one/zak and securezeron.github.io ZAK docsread 2026-10-05 |
||
| Specialist automation | ||
|
Browser & Computer Use Browser, desktop, or remote/local computer control for workflows that cannot be handled through stable APIs alone. |
||
|
ThreatModelerBrowser & Computer Use No agent drives a browser, desktop or remote computer. The agents work from design, code and cloud artifacts. They take in documents, diagrams, infrastructure as code and cloud context, and return threats and fixes through reports and pull requests. SourceThreatModeler, threatmodeler.ai/platform and /why-threatmodeler/developersread 2026-10-05 |
||
|
ZeronBrowser & Computer Use Agents act through API integrations, and none operates a browser or desktop. They work on EDR, SIEM, GRC, vulnerability management and ticketing tools through those tools' APIs, such as patching an endpoint through the CrowdStrike API. SourceZeron, zeron.one and /platformread 2026-10-05 |
||
Pricing snapshot
Sourced from the Index pricing dataset · open each vendor's profile for full detail.
| Pricing | T ThreatModeler |
Z Zeron |
|---|---|---|
|
Entry price Lowest public entry point |
Not public; quoted through enterprise engagement after a solutions engineering session | Contact sales. The ZAK ADK is free and open source. |
|
Pricing confidence How public the numbers are |
Contact only | Contact only |
|
Billing Primary billing axis |
enterprise subscription; basis not disclosed | Modular products (CRPM, Vendor Pulse and Insure Pulse) sold through sales, with the ZAK ADK free and open source. |
|
Variable cost Workload / overage exposure |
Medium variable cost | Medium variable cost |
|
Free tier / trial Try before you buy |
No free tier
|
Free tier
|
|
Buying motion Self-serve vs sales call |
Sales call | Sales call |
|
Pricing verified When this pricing was last checked |
Product updates
Newest first, each linked to its source.
ThreatModeler
-
· Agent capability
NexusAI, the new agentic experience inside ThreatModeler Nexus, builds a threat model from a diagram, design document, screenshot, infrastructure as code file, repository or plain description, asks about missing details and matches components to the customer's libraries.
Source -
· Security / enterprise
ThreatModeler updated its Intelligent Threat Engine (ITE) to detect advanced AI-specific threats at the architectural design stage.
Source
ThreatModeler acquired IriusRisk in January 2026, and IriusRisk now presents itself as part of ThreatModeler.
Other matchups in security and SOC agents
Not the pairing you were after? These compare a different set of security and SOC agents on the same 14 capabilities.