Agentic Index

Stacklok vs TrueFoundry (2026)

Both vendors last verified

Stacklok and TrueFoundry both put a gateway between AI agents and the tools and models they call, and they split on where it runs and how much of the agent they handle. That verdict is the Agentic Index coverage score, graded from each vendor's own published materials.

Stacklok runs only in your own Kubernetes cluster, installed as one Helm chart and air gapped if needed, and the company never hosts customer data. Its open source ToolHive runs each MCP server in an isolated container with its own permissions and secrets. Stacklok Enterprise adds a Connector Gateway that carries the identity of the person behind every tool call, and an AI Gateway that routes models, caps spend per user or group in dollars and screens prompts.

TrueFoundry offers its AI Gateway and MCP Gateway as managed SaaS in a region you choose, or self hosted on AWS, GCP, Azure, OpenShift or on premises. Its MCP Gateway pauses tools flagged as destructive for a person to approve, and its TrueForge harness builds and runs agents with cost and tool calls traced per session.

TrueFoundry publishes its prices, with a free Developer tier and Pro at $25 per user a month, while Stacklok Enterprise is quoted.

Choose Stacklok to keep every tool and model call inside your own cluster. Choose TrueFoundry for a hosted gateway with approvals and an agent harness built in.

On the Agentic Index agent infrastructure ranking, neither Stacklok nor TrueFoundry clears the bar, which asks for all five production contract capabilities documented in full. Neither documents testing, debugging and optimization in full. 33 of the 186 vendors in the lane clear it. See the agent infrastructure ranking

This comparison is published by Agentic Index, an independent agentic AI vendor research platform. Stacklok and TrueFoundry are each graded against the same 14 capability Agentic Index taxonomy, from the vendor's own public materials under the Agentic Index verification standard, alongside 1,140 researched vendors. No vendor pays for placement and no vendor has reviewed this page. How this evidence is graded

Choose Stacklok if

  • Nothing can leave your cluster. Stacklok installs as one Helm chart on your Kubernetes, runs air gapped, and the company neither hosts nor processes customer data.
  • You want MCP servers sandboxed one by one. ToolHive, free under Apache 2.0, runs each server in its own container with its own permissions and secrets, as a desktop app, CLI or Kubernetes operator.
  • Tool calls must carry a person's identity. The Connector Gateway brokers credentials per user from Okta or Microsoft Entra ID groups, so every call is traced to the person behind it.
  • Model spend and data leaks worry your security team. The AI Gateway caps spend per user or group in dollars, screens prompts for injection, scans for card and personal data and forwards audit events to a SIEM.
  • Your platform team wants a supply chain it can verify. Stacklok ships with Sigstore signatures, SLSA provenance and SBOMs, and it is led by Craig McLuckie and Joe Beda, who co created Kubernetes.

Choose TrueFoundry if

  • You want to start without a sales call. The Developer tier is free for up to 3 users, and Pro is $25 per user a month with 20,000 requests and MCP tool calls per user included.
  • Risky tools should wait for a person. The MCP Gateway pauses tools flagged as destructive until someone approves them, and it runs OAuth per user.
  • You also need somewhere to build and run agents. TrueForge, an MIT licensed harness, draws on gateway models, MCP tools and a versioned Skills Registry and runs code in an isolated sandbox.
  • Finance wants spend by team and by agent. Every agent session is traced with cost, tokens and tool calls, and a usage directory ranks users, teams and agents by spend.
  • You want a managed service now and the option to self host later. TrueFoundry runs as SaaS or on AWS, GCP, Azure, OpenShift or on premises, and names NetApp, NVIDIA and Aviva as customers.
Feature
S
Stacklok
T
TrueFoundry
Action & orchestration

Integrations & Tool Calling

Ability to connect agents to real systems through native integrations, OAuth-authenticated actions, custom tools, APIs, webhooks, or MCP-compatible tools.

Workflow Orchestration

Ability to sequence, branch, retry, route, and combine deterministic workflow nodes with autonomous agent steps.

Triggers & Channel Coverage

How agents wake up and where they work: schedules, webhooks, message events, CRM events, inbox events, chat, email, voice, and collaboration tools.

Knowledge & context

Knowledge Grounding & RAG

Ability to ground agent behavior in company data through document ingestion, retrieval, external knowledge APIs, semantic search, or RAG layers.

Memory & State Persistence

Ability to persist context across a run, conversation, workflow, user, team, or longer-term memory layer.

Control & trust

Human Oversight & Guardrails

Approval steps, consent checkpoints, escalation rules, structured guardrails, policy constraints, and pause/resume controls.

Security, Identity & Governance

RBAC, SSO, auditability, encryption, least-privilege tool access, compliance posture, and data handling policy.

Observability & Auditability

Traces, logs, execution histories, metrics, audit events, and debugging detail for production agent behavior.

Deployment & Data Residency

Deployment modes and options, including SaaS, dedicated cloud, VPC, on-prem, hybrid, local runtime, and self-hosting.

Solution readiness

Prebuilt Agents, Templates & Packs

Ready-made workflows, packaged employees, templates, blueprints, industry solutions, and role-specific agents that reduce time-to-value.

Platform extensibility

Model Flexibility & Routing

Ability to work across multiple foundation models, route tasks to different models, or let buyers bring their own providers and keys.

APIs, SDKs & MCP Extensibility

Composability layer: stable APIs, SDKs, MCP tool consumption/serving, custom tools, and integration into internal systems.

Testing, Debugging & Optimization

Testing, debugging, scoring, retries, fallbacks, quality gates, and optimization loops for improving agent workflows before and after deployment.

Specialist automation

Browser & Computer Use

Browser, desktop, or remote/local computer control for workflows that cannot be handled through stable APIs alone.

Pricing snapshot

Sourced from the Index pricing dataset · open each vendor's profile for full detail.

Pricing
S
Stacklok
T
TrueFoundry

Entry price

Lowest public entry point

Open source ToolHive free; Stacklok Enterprise quoted through sales Free Developer tier. Pro is $25 per user per month. Enterprise is priced through sales.

Pricing confidence

How public the numbers are

Contact only Public, partial

Billing

Primary billing axis

Annual Stacklok Enterprise subscription; open source core free Per user, plus gateway requests and MCP tool calls above the included allowance.

Variable cost

Workload / overage exposure

Low variable cost High variable cost

Free tier / trial

Try before you buy

Free tier
Free tierTrial

Buying motion

Self-serve vs sales call

Sales call Mixed

Pricing verified

When this pricing was last checked

Product updates

Newest first, each linked to its source.

Stacklok

  • · Security / enterprise

    ToolHive v0.57.0 adds authorization scoped to each backend in its virtual MCP server, so access rules can differ for each MCP server sitting behind the gateway.

    Source
  • · Security / enterprise

    ToolHive v0.53.0 adds group based upstream selection to the embedded auth server of its Virtual MCP Server.

    Source
  • · Integrations

    Stacklok has introduced an integration with Anthropic MCP Tunnels to securely connect Claude to internal systems behind corporate firewalls.

    Source

TrueFoundry

  • · Pricing / packaging

    SaaS and hybrid customers can now add curated open weight and frontier models that run on TrueFoundry's own capacity, with no provider account to create and no API key to rotate.

    Source
  • · Integrations

    TrueFoundry release 0.176.17 adds AWS Bedrock AgentCore as an agent registry integration that discovers, imports and syncs remote agents every hour.

    Source
  • · Human approval / guardrails

    TrueForge 0.3.0, TrueFoundry's open source agent harness, adds an API for human approval and policy events during a turn, a durable inbox for them, and a way for a user to approve a tool for the rest of a session with an optional expiry.

    Source

Neither Stacklok nor TrueFoundry publishes an enterprise price, so Stacklok Enterprise and TrueFoundry Enterprise both start with a quote. Stacklok governs what agents reach and records what they did, but it does not run agent workflows, hold memory or index documents. Mecatl, Stacklok's separate agent harness, is a different product. Stacklok describes guardrails and audit rather than an approval step a person signs off. TrueFoundry's managed service lists SOC 2 Type II, GDPR and HIPAA programs with reports on its trust site. Stacklok's case rests on never holding customer data and on a signed, verifiable distribution. Neither publishes a benchmark for its gateway's screening or routing. Stacklok is backed by Accel, Bain Capital Ventures and Madrona, and TrueFoundry is independent.

More comparisons with Stacklok or TrueFoundry

Other matchups in agent infrastructure platforms

Not the pairing you were after? These compare a different set of agent infrastructure platforms on the same 14 capabilities.

See all 176 agent infrastructure platforms comparisons

Contact us

Found a vendor we missed? Have feedback on the index? We'd love to hear from you.