Agentic Index
Scrapybara vs Tinyfish (2026)
Both give agents a computer to operate, at 9 and 8 of 14. That verdict is the Agentic Index coverage score, graded from each vendor's own published materials.
Scrapybara provides virtual desktops for computer use agents, with the full operating system available rather than a browser alone. TinyFish runs web agents at scale for data and workflow tasks across sites. Scrapybara is the right answer when the task needs a desktop application; TinyFish when it needs many sites operated repeatedly and reliably.
This comparison is published by Agentic Index, an independent agentic AI vendor research platform. Scrapybara and Tinyfish are each graded against the same 14 capability Agentic Index taxonomy, from the vendor's own public materials under the Agentic Index verification standard, alongside 969 researched vendors. No vendor pays for placement and no vendor has reviewed this page. How this evidence is graded
Choose Scrapybara if
- Documented coverage is slightly broader and the task requires a full desktop, not a browser.
- Desktop applications are part of the workflow you are automating.
- You want infrastructure your own agents drive.
Choose Tinyfish if
- Operating many sites repeatedly at scale is the workload.
- Web data and workflow tasks are the specific job.
- You want the agent behaviour solved rather than the environment provided.
| At a glance | Scrapybara | Tinyfish |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Browser / computer-use agent | Browser / computer-use agent |
| Entry price | From $29/mo · free tier | Free Search/Fetch; PAYG $0.015/step; Starter $15/mo, Pro $150/mo; Enterprise custom |
| Free / trial | n/p | — |
| Pricing confidence | public partial | public exact |
| Feature | S Scrapybara |
T Tinyfish |
|---|---|---|
| Action & orchestration | ||
|
Integrations & Tool Calling Ability to connect agents to real systems through native integrations, OAuth-authenticated actions, custom tools, APIs, webhooks, or MCP-compatible tools. |
Full / Explicit | Full / Explicit |
|
Workflow Orchestration Ability to sequence, branch, retry, route, and combine deterministic workflow nodes with autonomous agent steps. |
Full / Explicit | Full / Explicit |
|
Triggers & Channel Coverage How agents wake up and where they work: schedules, webhooks, message events, CRM events, inbox events, chat, email, voice, and collaboration tools. |
Partial | Partial |
| Knowledge & context | ||
|
Knowledge Grounding & RAG Ability to ground agent behavior in company data through document ingestion, retrieval, external knowledge APIs, semantic search, or RAG layers. |
No / Not documented | Partial |
|
Memory & State Persistence Ability to persist context across a run, conversation, workflow, user, team, or longer-term memory layer. |
Partial | Partial |
| Control & trust | ||
|
Human Oversight & Guardrails Approval steps, consent checkpoints, escalation rules, structured guardrails, policy constraints, and pause/resume controls. |
Partial | Partial |
|
Security, Identity & Governance RBAC, SSO, auditability, encryption, least-privilege tool access, compliance posture, and data handling policy. |
Partial | Partial |
|
Observability & Auditability Traces, logs, execution histories, metrics, audit events, and debugging detail for production agent behavior. |
Partial | Partial |
|
Deployment & Data Residency Deployment modes and options, including SaaS, dedicated cloud, VPC, on-prem, hybrid, local runtime, and self-hosting. |
No / Not documented | Partial |
| Solution readiness | ||
|
Prebuilt Agents, Templates & Packs Ready-made workflows, packaged employees, templates, blueprints, industry solutions, and role-specific agents that reduce time-to-value. |
Full / Explicit | No / Not documented |
| Platform extensibility | ||
|
Model Flexibility & Routing Ability to work across multiple foundation models, route tasks to different models, or let buyers bring their own providers and keys. |
Full / Explicit | No / Not documented |
|
APIs, SDKs & MCP Extensibility Composability layer: stable APIs, SDKs, MCP tool consumption/serving, custom tools, and integration into internal systems. |
Full / Explicit | Full / Explicit |
|
Testing, Debugging & Optimization Testing, debugging, scoring, retries, fallbacks, quality gates, and optimization loops for improving agent workflows before and after deployment. |
Partial | Partial |
| Specialist automation | ||
|
Browser & Computer Use Browser, desktop, or remote/local computer control for workflows that cannot be handled through stable APIs alone. |
Full / Explicit | Full / Explicit |
Pricing snapshot
Sourced from the Index pricing dataset · open each vendor's profile for full detail.
| Pricing | S Scrapybara |
T Tinyfish |
|---|---|---|
|
Entry price Lowest public entry point |
From $29/mo · free tier | Free Search/Fetch; PAYG $0.015/step; Starter $15/mo, Pro $150/mo; Enterprise custom |
|
Pricing confidence How public the numbers are |
Public, partial | Public, exact |
|
Billing Primary billing axis |
usage | — |
|
Variable cost Workload / overage exposure |
High variable cost | High variable cost |
|
Free tier / trial Try before you buy |
Free tier
|
No free tier
|
|
Buying motion Self-serve vs sales call |
Mixed | — |
More comparisons with Scrapybara or Tinyfish
Other matchups in browser and computer-use agents
Not the pairing you were after? These compare a different set of browser and computer-use agents on the same 14 capabilities.