Agentic Index

Ellipsis vs Graphite (2026)

Both vendors last verified

Both go past commentary into changing the code. That verdict is the Agentic Index coverage score, graded from each vendor's own published materials.

Ellipsis reviews every pull request for bugs and style violations, generates tested fixes and lets teams deploy configurable coding agents in the cloud, billed on model tokens plus a 10 percent platform fee, with no seat fees. Graphite is built around stacked pull requests with a stack aware merge queue and an agent that reviews, chats, fixes and merges, free hobby tier. Ellipsis generating tested fixes is the stronger single capability, and Graphite is the bigger change to how you work.

On the Agentic Index coding agent ranking, neither Ellipsis nor Graphite clears the bar, which asks for all five merge loop capabilities documented in full. Each documents two of the five in full. 3 of the 96 vendors in the lane clear it. See the coding agent ranking

This comparison is published by Agentic Index, an independent agentic AI vendor research platform. Ellipsis and Graphite are each graded against the same 14 capability Agentic Index taxonomy, from the vendor's own public materials under the Agentic Index verification standard, alongside 1,084 researched vendors. No vendor pays for placement and no vendor has reviewed this page. How this evidence is graded

Choose Ellipsis if

  • You want fixes generated with tests, and agents billed by usage rather than by seat.
  • Deploying configurable coding agents beyond review is capability you would use.
  • Free for public repositories with no feature limits is genuinely generous.

Choose Graphite if

  • Stacked pull requests are the workflow you want and nothing else here offers it.
  • A stack aware merge queue is the infrastructure gap.
  • One agent reviewing, fixing and merging suits how you want the pipeline to run.
Feature
E
Ellipsis
G
Graphite
Action & orchestration

Integrations & Tool Calling

Ability to connect agents to real systems through native integrations, OAuth-authenticated actions, custom tools, APIs, webhooks, or MCP-compatible tools.

Workflow Orchestration

Ability to sequence, branch, retry, route, and combine deterministic workflow nodes with autonomous agent steps.

Triggers & Channel Coverage

How agents wake up and where they work: schedules, webhooks, message events, CRM events, inbox events, chat, email, voice, and collaboration tools.

Knowledge & context

Knowledge Grounding & RAG

Ability to ground agent behavior in company data through document ingestion, retrieval, external knowledge APIs, semantic search, or RAG layers.

Memory & State Persistence

Ability to persist context across a run, conversation, workflow, user, team, or longer-term memory layer.

Control & trust

Human Oversight & Guardrails

Approval steps, consent checkpoints, escalation rules, structured guardrails, policy constraints, and pause/resume controls.

Security, Identity & Governance

RBAC, SSO, auditability, encryption, least-privilege tool access, compliance posture, and data handling policy.

Observability & Auditability

Traces, logs, execution histories, metrics, audit events, and debugging detail for production agent behavior.

Deployment & Data Residency

Deployment modes and options, including SaaS, dedicated cloud, VPC, on-prem, hybrid, local runtime, and self-hosting.

Solution readiness

Prebuilt Agents, Templates & Packs

Ready-made workflows, packaged employees, templates, blueprints, industry solutions, and role-specific agents that reduce time-to-value.

Platform extensibility

Model Flexibility & Routing

Ability to work across multiple foundation models, route tasks to different models, or let buyers bring their own providers and keys.

APIs, SDKs & MCP Extensibility

Composability layer: stable APIs, SDKs, MCP tool consumption/serving, custom tools, and integration into internal systems.

Testing, Debugging & Optimization

Testing, debugging, scoring, retries, fallbacks, quality gates, and optimization loops for improving agent workflows before and after deployment.

Specialist automation

Browser & Computer Use

Browser, desktop, or remote/local computer control for workflows that cannot be handled through stable APIs alone.

Pricing snapshot

Sourced from the Index pricing dataset · open each vendor's profile for full detail.

Pricing
E
Ellipsis
G
Graphite

Entry price

Lowest public entry point

Usage based, with model tokens plus a 10% platform fee and no seat fees. Free (Hobby: stacking CLI, VS Code, limited AI reviews) · Starter $20/user/mo annual · Team $40/user/mo annual (unlimited Graphite Agent + merge queue) · Enterprise custom

Pricing confidence

How public the numbers are

Public, exact Public, exact

Billing

Primary billing axis

Usage based. Prepaid credits pay model tokens at the published rate per million tokens, with a 10% platform fee on credit purchases, and organization sandbox CPU and memory at cost. Personal compute is free, and there are no per seat fees. Per user per month subscription tiers billed annually, with a free tier and a 30 day trial. The Team tier includes unlimited AI reviews and chat with no per review metering; enterprise is custom.

Variable cost

Workload / overage exposure

High variable cost Low variable cost

Free tier / trial

Try before you buy

Free tier
Free tierTrial

Buying motion

Self-serve vs sales call

Self-serve Self-serve

Pricing verified

When this pricing was last checked

Graphite joined Cursor after a December 2025 agreement with Anysphere, the maker of Cursor, and Anysphere became a SpaceXAI division in August 2026, so Graphite is not an independent vendor.

Other matchups in coding agents

Not the pairing you were after? These compare a different set of coding agents on the same 14 capabilities.

See all 120 coding agents comparisons

Contact us

Found a vendor we missed? Have feedback on the index? We'd love to hear from you.