Agentic Index

Charm Crush vs OpenCode (2026)

Charm's Crush and OpenCode are the two terminal AI coding agents developers actually compare, both free with bring your own keys: Crush is source available under FSL-1.1-MIT from the team behind the beloved Charm terminal tooling, polished terminal UX with your choice of model provider, while OpenCode is fully open source and free, provider agnostic with a strong community. That verdict is the Agentic Index coverage score, graded from each vendor's own published materials.

Cost is identical, your model provider tokens, so the decision is taste and trajectory: Crush for Charm's design quality and ecosystem, OpenCode for maximal openness and community pace.

On the Agentic Index coding agent ranking, neither Charm nor OpenCode clears the bar, which asks for all five merge loop capabilities documented in full. Charm does not document knowledge grounding and RAG in full, nor testing, debugging and optimization; OpenCode documents two of the five in full. 2 of the 70 vendors in the lane clear it. See the coding agent ranking

This comparison is published by Agentic Index, an independent agentic AI vendor research platform. Charm and OpenCode are each graded against the same 14 capability Agentic Index taxonomy, from the vendor's own public materials under the Agentic Index verification standard, alongside 955 researched vendors. No vendor pays for placement and no vendor has reviewed this page. How this evidence is graded

Choose Charm if

  • Charm's terminal design quality makes daily work genuinely nicer.
  • The surrounding Charm tool ecosystem is already in your workflow.
  • Source available licensing is acceptable for your use.

Choose OpenCode if

  • Fully open source licensing is a principle for your tooling.
  • Community development pace and plugin breadth matter.
  • Provider agnostic flexibility across models is the priority.
Feature
C
Charm
O
OpenCode
Action & orchestration

Integrations & Tool Calling

Ability to connect agents to real systems through native integrations, OAuth-authenticated actions, custom tools, APIs, webhooks, or MCP-compatible tools.

Workflow Orchestration

Ability to sequence, branch, retry, route, and combine deterministic workflow nodes with autonomous agent steps.

Triggers & Channel Coverage

How agents wake up and where they work: schedules, webhooks, message events, CRM events, inbox events, chat, email, voice, and collaboration tools.

Knowledge & context

Knowledge Grounding & RAG

Ability to ground agent behavior in company data through document ingestion, retrieval, external knowledge APIs, semantic search, or RAG layers.

Memory & State Persistence

Ability to persist context across a run, conversation, workflow, user, team, or longer-term memory layer.

Control & trust

Human Oversight & Guardrails

Approval steps, consent checkpoints, escalation rules, structured guardrails, policy constraints, and pause/resume controls.

Security, Identity & Governance

RBAC, SSO, auditability, encryption, least-privilege tool access, compliance posture, and data handling policy.

Observability & Auditability

Traces, logs, execution histories, metrics, audit events, and debugging detail for production agent behavior.

Deployment & Data Residency

Deployment modes and options, including SaaS, dedicated cloud, VPC, on-prem, hybrid, local runtime, and self-hosting.

Solution readiness

Prebuilt Agents, Templates & Packs

Ready-made workflows, packaged employees, templates, blueprints, industry solutions, and role-specific agents that reduce time-to-value.

Platform extensibility

Model Flexibility & Routing

Ability to work across multiple foundation models, route tasks to different models, or let buyers bring their own providers and keys.

APIs, SDKs & MCP Extensibility

Composability layer: stable APIs, SDKs, MCP tool consumption/serving, custom tools, and integration into internal systems.

Testing, Debugging & Optimization

Testing, debugging, scoring, retries, fallbacks, quality gates, and optimization loops for improving agent workflows before and after deployment.

Specialist automation

Browser & Computer Use

Browser, desktop, or remote/local computer control for workflows that cannot be handled through stable APIs alone.

Pricing snapshot

Sourced from the Index pricing dataset · open each vendor's profile for full detail.

Pricing
C
Charm
O
OpenCode

Entry price

Lowest public entry point

Free and source available. Developers bring their own model keys. Free and open source with your own provider keys. OpenCode Go is $10 a month, or Go Plus $40 a month, for curated open models. OpenCode Zen is pay as you go per million tokens, and Enterprise is per seat through sales.

Pricing confidence

How public the numbers are

Public, partial Public, exact

Billing

Primary billing axis

Crush itself is free. Model usage is paid to the chosen provider, or in Hyper credits on Charm's own inference service. Hybrid. The agent is free with the customer's own keys, OpenCode Go is a flat monthly plan with per model allowances, OpenCode Zen bills per million tokens against a prepaid balance, and Enterprise is per seat.

Variable cost

Workload / overage exposure

High variable cost Medium variable cost

Free tier / trial

Try before you buy

Free tier
Free tier

Buying motion

Self-serve vs sales call

Self-serve Self-serve

More comparisons with Charm or OpenCode

Other matchups in coding agents

Not the pairing you were after? These compare a different set of coding agents on the same 14 capabilities.

See all 96 coding agents comparisons

Contact us

Found a vendor we missed? Have feedback on the index? We'd love to hear from you.